Cargando…

(18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: (18)F-FDG PET is a widely used tool for molecular imaging of oncological, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. We evaluated (18)F-FDG microPET as an implant osteomyelitis imaging tool using a Staphylococcus aureus-induced peroperative implant infection in rabbits. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odekerken, Jim C E, Brans, Boudewijn T, Welting, Tim J M, Walenkamp, Geert H I M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24673540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.900894
_version_ 1782321691986231296
author Odekerken, Jim C E
Brans, Boudewijn T
Welting, Tim J M
Walenkamp, Geert H I M
author_facet Odekerken, Jim C E
Brans, Boudewijn T
Welting, Tim J M
Walenkamp, Geert H I M
author_sort Odekerken, Jim C E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: (18)F-FDG PET is a widely used tool for molecular imaging of oncological, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. We evaluated (18)F-FDG microPET as an implant osteomyelitis imaging tool using a Staphylococcus aureus-induced peroperative implant infection in rabbits. METHODS: Intramedullary titanium nails were implanted in contaminated and uncontaminated (control) proximal right tibiae of rabbits. Tibiae were quantitatively assessed with microPET for (18)F-FDG uptake before and sequentially at 1, 3, and 6 weeks after surgery. Tracer uptake was assessed in soft tissue and bone in both treatment groups with an additional comparison between the operated and unoperated limb. MicroPET analysis was combined with radiographic assessment and complementary histology of the tibiae. RESULTS: At the first postoperative week, the (18)F-FDG uptake in the contaminated implant group was significantly higher than the preoperative measurement, without a significant difference between the contaminated and uncontaminated tibiae. From the third postoperative week onward, (18)F-FDG uptake allowed discrimination between osteomyelitis and postoperative aseptic bone healing, as well as quantification of the infection at distinct locations around the implant. INTERPRETATION: (18)F-FDG-based microPET imaging allows differentiation between deep infection and undisturbed wound healing after implantation of a titanium intramedullary nail in this rabbit model. Furthermore, our results indicate that (18)F-FDG PET may provide a tool in human clinical diagnostics and for the evaluation of antimicrobial strategies in animal models of orthopedic implant infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4062800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40628002014-07-02 (18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia Odekerken, Jim C E Brans, Boudewijn T Welting, Tim J M Walenkamp, Geert H I M Acta Orthop Lower Leg BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: (18)F-FDG PET is a widely used tool for molecular imaging of oncological, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. We evaluated (18)F-FDG microPET as an implant osteomyelitis imaging tool using a Staphylococcus aureus-induced peroperative implant infection in rabbits. METHODS: Intramedullary titanium nails were implanted in contaminated and uncontaminated (control) proximal right tibiae of rabbits. Tibiae were quantitatively assessed with microPET for (18)F-FDG uptake before and sequentially at 1, 3, and 6 weeks after surgery. Tracer uptake was assessed in soft tissue and bone in both treatment groups with an additional comparison between the operated and unoperated limb. MicroPET analysis was combined with radiographic assessment and complementary histology of the tibiae. RESULTS: At the first postoperative week, the (18)F-FDG uptake in the contaminated implant group was significantly higher than the preoperative measurement, without a significant difference between the contaminated and uncontaminated tibiae. From the third postoperative week onward, (18)F-FDG uptake allowed discrimination between osteomyelitis and postoperative aseptic bone healing, as well as quantification of the infection at distinct locations around the implant. INTERPRETATION: (18)F-FDG-based microPET imaging allows differentiation between deep infection and undisturbed wound healing after implantation of a titanium intramedullary nail in this rabbit model. Furthermore, our results indicate that (18)F-FDG PET may provide a tool in human clinical diagnostics and for the evaluation of antimicrobial strategies in animal models of orthopedic implant infection. Informa Healthcare 2014-06 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4062800/ /pubmed/24673540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.900894 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited.
spellingShingle Lower Leg
Odekerken, Jim C E
Brans, Boudewijn T
Welting, Tim J M
Walenkamp, Geert H I M
(18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia
title (18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia
title_full (18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia
title_fullStr (18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia
title_full_unstemmed (18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia
title_short (18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: A longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia
title_sort (18)f-fdg micropet imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: a longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia
topic Lower Leg
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24673540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.900894
work_keys_str_mv AT odekerkenjimce 18ffdgmicropetimagingdifferentiatesbetweensepticandasepticwoundhealingafterorthopedicimplantplacementalongitudinalstudyofanimplantosteomyelitisintherabbittibia
AT bransboudewijnt 18ffdgmicropetimagingdifferentiatesbetweensepticandasepticwoundhealingafterorthopedicimplantplacementalongitudinalstudyofanimplantosteomyelitisintherabbittibia
AT weltingtimjm 18ffdgmicropetimagingdifferentiatesbetweensepticandasepticwoundhealingafterorthopedicimplantplacementalongitudinalstudyofanimplantosteomyelitisintherabbittibia
AT walenkampgeerthim 18ffdgmicropetimagingdifferentiatesbetweensepticandasepticwoundhealingafterorthopedicimplantplacementalongitudinalstudyofanimplantosteomyelitisintherabbittibia