Cargando…

Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation can induce unfavorable hemodynamic changes as propofol itself can induce hypotension. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation conditions and hemodynamic changes occurr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safavi, Mohammadreza, Honarmand, Azim, Banisadr, Golnaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949293
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.133195
_version_ 1782321745844240384
author Safavi, Mohammadreza
Honarmand, Azim
Banisadr, Golnaz
author_facet Safavi, Mohammadreza
Honarmand, Azim
Banisadr, Golnaz
author_sort Safavi, Mohammadreza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation can induce unfavorable hemodynamic changes as propofol itself can induce hypotension. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation conditions and hemodynamic changes occurred after intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blinded prospective study was performed on 140 patients aged 18-60 who received different additional doses of propofol and were randomly allocated into 4 groups as follows: A: Received additional dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg infused after an initial dose 1.5 mg/kg. B: Received additional dose of propofol 1 mg/kg infused after an initial dose 1 mg/kg. C: Received additional dose of propofol 1.5 mg/kg after an initial dose 1 mg/kg. D: Received propofol 2 mg/kg as a bolus with no additional dose. RESULTS: Intubation conditions were acceptable in 91.4% of Group A patients, 94.2% of Group B patients, 97.1% of Group C patients and 68.5% of Group D patients. There were no significant differences in the mean of heart rate between four groups at any time before and after laryngoscopy. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 3 min after laryngoscopy was significantly lower in Group D versus Group A (P = 0.015) while MAP was not different at any time between other groups. CONCLUSION: Infusion of propofol 1.5 mg/kg added to initial bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg improves intubation conditions significantly without inducing hemodynamic changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4063089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40630892014-06-19 Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial Safavi, Mohammadreza Honarmand, Azim Banisadr, Golnaz Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation can induce unfavorable hemodynamic changes as propofol itself can induce hypotension. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation conditions and hemodynamic changes occurred after intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blinded prospective study was performed on 140 patients aged 18-60 who received different additional doses of propofol and were randomly allocated into 4 groups as follows: A: Received additional dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg infused after an initial dose 1.5 mg/kg. B: Received additional dose of propofol 1 mg/kg infused after an initial dose 1 mg/kg. C: Received additional dose of propofol 1.5 mg/kg after an initial dose 1 mg/kg. D: Received propofol 2 mg/kg as a bolus with no additional dose. RESULTS: Intubation conditions were acceptable in 91.4% of Group A patients, 94.2% of Group B patients, 97.1% of Group C patients and 68.5% of Group D patients. There were no significant differences in the mean of heart rate between four groups at any time before and after laryngoscopy. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 3 min after laryngoscopy was significantly lower in Group D versus Group A (P = 0.015) while MAP was not different at any time between other groups. CONCLUSION: Infusion of propofol 1.5 mg/kg added to initial bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg improves intubation conditions significantly without inducing hemodynamic changes. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4063089/ /pubmed/24949293 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.133195 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Safavi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Safavi, Mohammadreza
Honarmand, Azim
Banisadr, Golnaz
Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial
title Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial
title_full Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial
title_short Comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial
title_sort comparing the effects of three different additional doses of propofol infusion on intubation condition and hemodynamic changes during general anesthesia under elective surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949293
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.133195
work_keys_str_mv AT safavimohammadreza comparingtheeffectsofthreedifferentadditionaldosesofpropofolinfusiononintubationconditionandhemodynamicchangesduringgeneralanesthesiaunderelectivesurgeryarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT honarmandazim comparingtheeffectsofthreedifferentadditionaldosesofpropofolinfusiononintubationconditionandhemodynamicchangesduringgeneralanesthesiaunderelectivesurgeryarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT banisadrgolnaz comparingtheeffectsofthreedifferentadditionaldosesofpropofolinfusiononintubationconditionandhemodynamicchangesduringgeneralanesthesiaunderelectivesurgeryarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial