Cargando…
Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-19 |
_version_ | 1782321789563568128 |
---|---|
author | Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata Bahl, Martin Iain Carvalho, Vera Kristiansen, Karsten Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas Gupta, Ramneek Licht, Tine Rask |
author_facet | Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata Bahl, Martin Iain Carvalho, Vera Kristiansen, Karsten Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas Gupta, Ramneek Licht, Tine Rask |
author_sort | Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effects of choice of methodology on the output resulting from such studies. RESULTS: In this study we conducted a systematic comparison of the DNA extraction methods used by the two major collaborative efforts: The European MetaHIT and the American Human Microbiome Project (HMP). Additionally, effects of homogenizing the samples before extraction were addressed. We observed significant differences in distribution of bacterial taxa depending on the method. While eukaryotic DNA was most efficiently extracted by the MetaHIT protocol, DNA from bacteria within the Bacteroidetes phylum was most efficiently extracted by the HMP protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas it is comforting that the inter-individual variation clearly exceeded the variation resulting from choice of extraction method, our data highlight the challenge of comparing data across studies applying different methodologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4063427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40634272014-06-20 Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata Bahl, Martin Iain Carvalho, Vera Kristiansen, Karsten Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas Gupta, Ramneek Licht, Tine Rask Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effects of choice of methodology on the output resulting from such studies. RESULTS: In this study we conducted a systematic comparison of the DNA extraction methods used by the two major collaborative efforts: The European MetaHIT and the American Human Microbiome Project (HMP). Additionally, effects of homogenizing the samples before extraction were addressed. We observed significant differences in distribution of bacterial taxa depending on the method. While eukaryotic DNA was most efficiently extracted by the MetaHIT protocol, DNA from bacteria within the Bacteroidetes phylum was most efficiently extracted by the HMP protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas it is comforting that the inter-individual variation clearly exceeded the variation resulting from choice of extraction method, our data highlight the challenge of comparing data across studies applying different methodologies. BioMed Central 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4063427/ /pubmed/24949196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-19 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wesolowska-Andersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata Bahl, Martin Iain Carvalho, Vera Kristiansen, Karsten Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas Gupta, Ramneek Licht, Tine Rask Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis |
title | Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis |
title_full | Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis |
title_fullStr | Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis |
title_short | Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis |
title_sort | choice of bacterial dna extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wesolowskaandersenagata choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis AT bahlmartiniain choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis AT carvalhovera choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis AT kristiansenkarsten choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis AT sicheritzpontenthomas choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis AT guptaramneek choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis AT lichttinerask choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis |