Cargando…

Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis

BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata, Bahl, Martin Iain, Carvalho, Vera, Kristiansen, Karsten, Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas, Gupta, Ramneek, Licht, Tine Rask
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-19
_version_ 1782321789563568128
author Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata
Bahl, Martin Iain
Carvalho, Vera
Kristiansen, Karsten
Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas
Gupta, Ramneek
Licht, Tine Rask
author_facet Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata
Bahl, Martin Iain
Carvalho, Vera
Kristiansen, Karsten
Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas
Gupta, Ramneek
Licht, Tine Rask
author_sort Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effects of choice of methodology on the output resulting from such studies. RESULTS: In this study we conducted a systematic comparison of the DNA extraction methods used by the two major collaborative efforts: The European MetaHIT and the American Human Microbiome Project (HMP). Additionally, effects of homogenizing the samples before extraction were addressed. We observed significant differences in distribution of bacterial taxa depending on the method. While eukaryotic DNA was most efficiently extracted by the MetaHIT protocol, DNA from bacteria within the Bacteroidetes phylum was most efficiently extracted by the HMP protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas it is comforting that the inter-individual variation clearly exceeded the variation resulting from choice of extraction method, our data highlight the challenge of comparing data across studies applying different methodologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4063427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40634272014-06-20 Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata Bahl, Martin Iain Carvalho, Vera Kristiansen, Karsten Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas Gupta, Ramneek Licht, Tine Rask Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effects of choice of methodology on the output resulting from such studies. RESULTS: In this study we conducted a systematic comparison of the DNA extraction methods used by the two major collaborative efforts: The European MetaHIT and the American Human Microbiome Project (HMP). Additionally, effects of homogenizing the samples before extraction were addressed. We observed significant differences in distribution of bacterial taxa depending on the method. While eukaryotic DNA was most efficiently extracted by the MetaHIT protocol, DNA from bacteria within the Bacteroidetes phylum was most efficiently extracted by the HMP protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas it is comforting that the inter-individual variation clearly exceeded the variation resulting from choice of extraction method, our data highlight the challenge of comparing data across studies applying different methodologies. BioMed Central 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4063427/ /pubmed/24949196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-19 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wesolowska-Andersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wesolowska-Andersen, Agata
Bahl, Martin Iain
Carvalho, Vera
Kristiansen, Karsten
Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas
Gupta, Ramneek
Licht, Tine Rask
Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
title Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
title_full Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
title_fullStr Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
title_short Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
title_sort choice of bacterial dna extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-19
work_keys_str_mv AT wesolowskaandersenagata choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis
AT bahlmartiniain choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis
AT carvalhovera choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis
AT kristiansenkarsten choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis
AT sicheritzpontenthomas choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis
AT guptaramneek choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis
AT lichttinerask choiceofbacterialdnaextractionmethodfromfecalmaterialinfluencescommunitystructureasevaluatedbymetagenomicanalysis