Cargando…

Barriers to medical device innovation

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has defined a medical device as a health care product that does not achieve it’s purpose by chemical action or by being metabolized. This means that a vast number of products are considered medical devices. Such devices play an essential role in the practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergsland, Jacob, Elle, Ole Jakob, Fosse, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966699
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S43369
_version_ 1782321861630099456
author Bergsland, Jacob
Elle, Ole Jakob
Fosse, Erik
author_facet Bergsland, Jacob
Elle, Ole Jakob
Fosse, Erik
author_sort Bergsland, Jacob
collection PubMed
description The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has defined a medical device as a health care product that does not achieve it’s purpose by chemical action or by being metabolized. This means that a vast number of products are considered medical devices. Such devices play an essential role in the practice of medicine. The FDA classifies medical devices in three classes, depending on the risk of the device. Since Class I and II devices have relatively simple requirements for getting to the market, this review will focus on “implantable devices”, which, in general, belong to Class III. The European Union and Canada use a slightly different classification system. While early generations of medical devices were introduced without much testing, either technical or clinical, the process of introducing a Class III medical device from concept to clinical practice has become strongly regulated and requires extensive technological and clinical testing. The modern era of implantable medical devices may be considered to have started in the 1920s with development of artificial hips. The implantable pacemaker was another milestone and pacemakers and cardioverters/defibrillators have since saved millions of lives and created commercial giants in the medical device industry. This review will include some examples of cardiovascular devices. Similar considerations apply to the total implantable device market, although clinical and technological applications obviously vary considerably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4063798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40637982014-06-25 Barriers to medical device innovation Bergsland, Jacob Elle, Ole Jakob Fosse, Erik Med Devices (Auckl) Review The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has defined a medical device as a health care product that does not achieve it’s purpose by chemical action or by being metabolized. This means that a vast number of products are considered medical devices. Such devices play an essential role in the practice of medicine. The FDA classifies medical devices in three classes, depending on the risk of the device. Since Class I and II devices have relatively simple requirements for getting to the market, this review will focus on “implantable devices”, which, in general, belong to Class III. The European Union and Canada use a slightly different classification system. While early generations of medical devices were introduced without much testing, either technical or clinical, the process of introducing a Class III medical device from concept to clinical practice has become strongly regulated and requires extensive technological and clinical testing. The modern era of implantable medical devices may be considered to have started in the 1920s with development of artificial hips. The implantable pacemaker was another milestone and pacemakers and cardioverters/defibrillators have since saved millions of lives and created commercial giants in the medical device industry. This review will include some examples of cardiovascular devices. Similar considerations apply to the total implantable device market, although clinical and technological applications obviously vary considerably. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4063798/ /pubmed/24966699 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S43369 Text en © 2014 Bergsland et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Bergsland, Jacob
Elle, Ole Jakob
Fosse, Erik
Barriers to medical device innovation
title Barriers to medical device innovation
title_full Barriers to medical device innovation
title_fullStr Barriers to medical device innovation
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to medical device innovation
title_short Barriers to medical device innovation
title_sort barriers to medical device innovation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4063798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966699
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S43369
work_keys_str_mv AT bergslandjacob barrierstomedicaldeviceinnovation
AT elleolejakob barrierstomedicaldeviceinnovation
AT fosseerik barrierstomedicaldeviceinnovation