Cargando…
Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corne...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24145556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.119317 |
_version_ | 1782321921156710400 |
---|---|
author | Murugesan, Vanathi Bypareddy, Ravi Kumar, Mahesh Tanuj, Dada Anita, Panda |
author_facet | Murugesan, Vanathi Bypareddy, Ravi Kumar, Mahesh Tanuj, Dada Anita, Panda |
author_sort | Murugesan, Vanathi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc)], corneal topography, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference in ORA parameter between post-PK eyes and normal eyes. Correlation between parameters was evaluated with Spearman's rho correlation. RESULTS: The ORA study of 100 eyes of 50 normal subjects and 54 post-keratoplasty eyes of 51 patients showed CH of 8.340 ± 1.85 and 9.923 ± 1.558, CRF of 8.846 ± 2.39 and 9.577 ± 1.631 in post-PK eyes and normal eyes, respectively. CH and CRF did not correlate with post-keratoplasty astigmatism (P =0.311 and 0.276, respectively) while a significant correlation was observed with IOPg (P =0.004) and IOPcc (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Biomechanical profiles were significantly decreased in post-keratoplasty eyes with significant correlation with higher IOP as compared with that in normal eyes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4064222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40642222014-06-25 Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer Murugesan, Vanathi Bypareddy, Ravi Kumar, Mahesh Tanuj, Dada Anita, Panda Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc)], corneal topography, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference in ORA parameter between post-PK eyes and normal eyes. Correlation between parameters was evaluated with Spearman's rho correlation. RESULTS: The ORA study of 100 eyes of 50 normal subjects and 54 post-keratoplasty eyes of 51 patients showed CH of 8.340 ± 1.85 and 9.923 ± 1.558, CRF of 8.846 ± 2.39 and 9.577 ± 1.631 in post-PK eyes and normal eyes, respectively. CH and CRF did not correlate with post-keratoplasty astigmatism (P =0.311 and 0.276, respectively) while a significant correlation was observed with IOPg (P =0.004) and IOPcc (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Biomechanical profiles were significantly decreased in post-keratoplasty eyes with significant correlation with higher IOP as compared with that in normal eyes. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4064222/ /pubmed/24145556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.119317 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Murugesan, Vanathi Bypareddy, Ravi Kumar, Mahesh Tanuj, Dada Anita, Panda Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer |
title | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer |
title_full | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer |
title_short | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer |
title_sort | evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24145556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.119317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murugesanvanathi evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer AT bypareddyravi evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer AT kumarmahesh evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer AT tanujdada evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer AT anitapanda evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer |