Cargando…

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murugesan, Vanathi, Bypareddy, Ravi, Kumar, Mahesh, Tanuj, Dada, Anita, Panda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24145556
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.119317
_version_ 1782321921156710400
author Murugesan, Vanathi
Bypareddy, Ravi
Kumar, Mahesh
Tanuj, Dada
Anita, Panda
author_facet Murugesan, Vanathi
Bypareddy, Ravi
Kumar, Mahesh
Tanuj, Dada
Anita, Panda
author_sort Murugesan, Vanathi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc)], corneal topography, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference in ORA parameter between post-PK eyes and normal eyes. Correlation between parameters was evaluated with Spearman's rho correlation. RESULTS: The ORA study of 100 eyes of 50 normal subjects and 54 post-keratoplasty eyes of 51 patients showed CH of 8.340 ± 1.85 and 9.923 ± 1.558, CRF of 8.846 ± 2.39 and 9.577 ± 1.631 in post-PK eyes and normal eyes, respectively. CH and CRF did not correlate with post-keratoplasty astigmatism (P =0.311 and 0.276, respectively) while a significant correlation was observed with IOPg (P =0.004) and IOPcc (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Biomechanical profiles were significantly decreased in post-keratoplasty eyes with significant correlation with higher IOP as compared with that in normal eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4064222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40642222014-06-25 Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer Murugesan, Vanathi Bypareddy, Ravi Kumar, Mahesh Tanuj, Dada Anita, Panda Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc)], corneal topography, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference in ORA parameter between post-PK eyes and normal eyes. Correlation between parameters was evaluated with Spearman's rho correlation. RESULTS: The ORA study of 100 eyes of 50 normal subjects and 54 post-keratoplasty eyes of 51 patients showed CH of 8.340 ± 1.85 and 9.923 ± 1.558, CRF of 8.846 ± 2.39 and 9.577 ± 1.631 in post-PK eyes and normal eyes, respectively. CH and CRF did not correlate with post-keratoplasty astigmatism (P =0.311 and 0.276, respectively) while a significant correlation was observed with IOPg (P =0.004) and IOPcc (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Biomechanical profiles were significantly decreased in post-keratoplasty eyes with significant correlation with higher IOP as compared with that in normal eyes. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4064222/ /pubmed/24145556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.119317 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Murugesan, Vanathi
Bypareddy, Ravi
Kumar, Mahesh
Tanuj, Dada
Anita, Panda
Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
title Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
title_full Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
title_fullStr Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
title_short Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
title_sort evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24145556
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.119317
work_keys_str_mv AT murugesanvanathi evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer
AT bypareddyravi evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer
AT kumarmahesh evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer
AT tanujdada evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer
AT anitapanda evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingocularresponseanalyzer