Cargando…
Evaluating the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison of Current Biomolecular Force Fields
[Image: see text] Recent advances in computer hardware and software have made rigorous evaluation of current biomolecular force fields using microsecond-scale simulations possible. Force fields differ in their treatment of electrostatic interactions, including the formation of salt bridges in protei...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical
Society
2014
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24702709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp500958r |
_version_ | 1782321974906716160 |
---|---|
author | Debiec, Karl T. Gronenborn, Angela M. Chong, Lillian T. |
author_facet | Debiec, Karl T. Gronenborn, Angela M. Chong, Lillian T. |
author_sort | Debiec, Karl T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Recent advances in computer hardware and software have made rigorous evaluation of current biomolecular force fields using microsecond-scale simulations possible. Force fields differ in their treatment of electrostatic interactions, including the formation of salt bridges in proteins. Here we conducted an extensive evaluation of salt bridge interactions in the latest AMBER, CHARMM, and OPLS force fields, using microsecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations of amino acid analogues in explicit solvent. We focused on salt bridges between three different pairs of oppositely charged amino acids: Arg/Asp, Lys/Asp, and His(+)/Asp. Our results reveal considerable variability in the predicted K(A) values of the salt bridges for these force fields, as well as differences from experimental data: almost all of the force fields overestimate the strengths of the salt bridges. When amino acids are represented by side-chain analogues, the AMBER ff03 force field overestimates the K(A) values the least, while for complete amino acids, the AMBER ff13α force field yields the lowest K(A) value, most likely caused by an altered balance of side-chain/side-chain and side-chain/backbone contacts. These findings confirm the notion that the implicit incorporation of solvent polarization improves the accuracy of modeling salt bridge interactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4064690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | American Chemical
Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40646902015-04-05 Evaluating the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison of Current Biomolecular Force Fields Debiec, Karl T. Gronenborn, Angela M. Chong, Lillian T. J Phys Chem B [Image: see text] Recent advances in computer hardware and software have made rigorous evaluation of current biomolecular force fields using microsecond-scale simulations possible. Force fields differ in their treatment of electrostatic interactions, including the formation of salt bridges in proteins. Here we conducted an extensive evaluation of salt bridge interactions in the latest AMBER, CHARMM, and OPLS force fields, using microsecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations of amino acid analogues in explicit solvent. We focused on salt bridges between three different pairs of oppositely charged amino acids: Arg/Asp, Lys/Asp, and His(+)/Asp. Our results reveal considerable variability in the predicted K(A) values of the salt bridges for these force fields, as well as differences from experimental data: almost all of the force fields overestimate the strengths of the salt bridges. When amino acids are represented by side-chain analogues, the AMBER ff03 force field overestimates the K(A) values the least, while for complete amino acids, the AMBER ff13α force field yields the lowest K(A) value, most likely caused by an altered balance of side-chain/side-chain and side-chain/backbone contacts. These findings confirm the notion that the implicit incorporation of solvent polarization improves the accuracy of modeling salt bridge interactions. American Chemical Society 2014-04-05 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4064690/ /pubmed/24702709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp500958r Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society Open Access on 04/05/2015 |
spellingShingle | Debiec, Karl T. Gronenborn, Angela M. Chong, Lillian T. Evaluating the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison of Current Biomolecular Force Fields |
title | Evaluating
the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison
of Current Biomolecular Force Fields |
title_full | Evaluating
the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison
of Current Biomolecular Force Fields |
title_fullStr | Evaluating
the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison
of Current Biomolecular Force Fields |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating
the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison
of Current Biomolecular Force Fields |
title_short | Evaluating
the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison
of Current Biomolecular Force Fields |
title_sort | evaluating
the strength of salt bridges: a comparison
of current biomolecular force fields |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24702709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp500958r |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debieckarlt evaluatingthestrengthofsaltbridgesacomparisonofcurrentbiomolecularforcefields AT gronenbornangelam evaluatingthestrengthofsaltbridgesacomparisonofcurrentbiomolecularforcefields AT chonglilliant evaluatingthestrengthofsaltbridgesacomparisonofcurrentbiomolecularforcefields |