Cargando…

Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations

OBJECTIVE: Comparing sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester pregnancy termination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 268 women at 12-24 weeks of gestation candidate for pregnancy termination were enrolled. Women were randomly divided in two groups. The first group received 400 µg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milani, Forozan, Sharami, Seyede Hajar, Arjmandi, Saeedeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971132
_version_ 1782321985165983744
author Milani, Forozan
Sharami, Seyede Hajar
Arjmandi, Saeedeh
author_facet Milani, Forozan
Sharami, Seyede Hajar
Arjmandi, Saeedeh
author_sort Milani, Forozan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Comparing sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester pregnancy termination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 268 women at 12-24 weeks of gestation candidate for pregnancy termination were enrolled. Women were randomly divided in two groups. The first group received 400 µg sublingual misoprostol and vaginal placebo and the second group received 400 µg vaginal misoprostol and sublingual placebo every 4 hours for a maximum of five doses. The course of misoprostol was repeated if the women did not abort within 24 hours. RESULTS: The median induction-to-abortion interval was shorter in sublingual group (12/72 hours in sublingual and 14/67 hours in vaginal). There was no significant difference in the success rate at 24 and 48 hours and in side effects. The preference for the sublingual route of administration was higher. CONCLUSION: Both vaginal and sublingual misoprostol are effective for medical abortion in second trimester termination. But it appears from shorter induction interval in sublingual and higher acceptability that sublingual route is a better choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4064756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40647562014-06-26 Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations Milani, Forozan Sharami, Seyede Hajar Arjmandi, Saeedeh J Family Reprod Health Original Article OBJECTIVE: Comparing sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester pregnancy termination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 268 women at 12-24 weeks of gestation candidate for pregnancy termination were enrolled. Women were randomly divided in two groups. The first group received 400 µg sublingual misoprostol and vaginal placebo and the second group received 400 µg vaginal misoprostol and sublingual placebo every 4 hours for a maximum of five doses. The course of misoprostol was repeated if the women did not abort within 24 hours. RESULTS: The median induction-to-abortion interval was shorter in sublingual group (12/72 hours in sublingual and 14/67 hours in vaginal). There was no significant difference in the success rate at 24 and 48 hours and in side effects. The preference for the sublingual route of administration was higher. CONCLUSION: Both vaginal and sublingual misoprostol are effective for medical abortion in second trimester termination. But it appears from shorter induction interval in sublingual and higher acceptability that sublingual route is a better choice. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4064756/ /pubmed/24971132 Text en Copyright © Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Milani, Forozan
Sharami, Seyede Hajar
Arjmandi, Saeedeh
Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
title Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
title_full Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
title_fullStr Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
title_short Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
title_sort comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy terminations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971132
work_keys_str_mv AT milaniforozan comparisonofsublingualandvaginalmisoprostolforsecondtrimesterpregnancyterminations
AT sharamiseyedehajar comparisonofsublingualandvaginalmisoprostolforsecondtrimesterpregnancyterminations
AT arjmandisaeedeh comparisonofsublingualandvaginalmisoprostolforsecondtrimesterpregnancyterminations