Cargando…
Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
OBJECTIVE: Comparing sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester pregnancy termination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 268 women at 12-24 weeks of gestation candidate for pregnancy termination were enrolled. Women were randomly divided in two groups. The first group received 400 µg...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971132 |
_version_ | 1782321985165983744 |
---|---|
author | Milani, Forozan Sharami, Seyede Hajar Arjmandi, Saeedeh |
author_facet | Milani, Forozan Sharami, Seyede Hajar Arjmandi, Saeedeh |
author_sort | Milani, Forozan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Comparing sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester pregnancy termination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 268 women at 12-24 weeks of gestation candidate for pregnancy termination were enrolled. Women were randomly divided in two groups. The first group received 400 µg sublingual misoprostol and vaginal placebo and the second group received 400 µg vaginal misoprostol and sublingual placebo every 4 hours for a maximum of five doses. The course of misoprostol was repeated if the women did not abort within 24 hours. RESULTS: The median induction-to-abortion interval was shorter in sublingual group (12/72 hours in sublingual and 14/67 hours in vaginal). There was no significant difference in the success rate at 24 and 48 hours and in side effects. The preference for the sublingual route of administration was higher. CONCLUSION: Both vaginal and sublingual misoprostol are effective for medical abortion in second trimester termination. But it appears from shorter induction interval in sublingual and higher acceptability that sublingual route is a better choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4064756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40647562014-06-26 Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations Milani, Forozan Sharami, Seyede Hajar Arjmandi, Saeedeh J Family Reprod Health Original Article OBJECTIVE: Comparing sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester pregnancy termination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 268 women at 12-24 weeks of gestation candidate for pregnancy termination were enrolled. Women were randomly divided in two groups. The first group received 400 µg sublingual misoprostol and vaginal placebo and the second group received 400 µg vaginal misoprostol and sublingual placebo every 4 hours for a maximum of five doses. The course of misoprostol was repeated if the women did not abort within 24 hours. RESULTS: The median induction-to-abortion interval was shorter in sublingual group (12/72 hours in sublingual and 14/67 hours in vaginal). There was no significant difference in the success rate at 24 and 48 hours and in side effects. The preference for the sublingual route of administration was higher. CONCLUSION: Both vaginal and sublingual misoprostol are effective for medical abortion in second trimester termination. But it appears from shorter induction interval in sublingual and higher acceptability that sublingual route is a better choice. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4064756/ /pubmed/24971132 Text en Copyright © Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Milani, Forozan Sharami, Seyede Hajar Arjmandi, Saeedeh Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations |
title | Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations |
title_full | Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations |
title_short | Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations |
title_sort | comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy terminations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milaniforozan comparisonofsublingualandvaginalmisoprostolforsecondtrimesterpregnancyterminations AT sharamiseyedehajar comparisonofsublingualandvaginalmisoprostolforsecondtrimesterpregnancyterminations AT arjmandisaeedeh comparisonofsublingualandvaginalmisoprostolforsecondtrimesterpregnancyterminations |