Cargando…

The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap

BACKGROUND: The intention of mandibular reconstruction is to restore the complex anatomy with maximum possible functionality and high accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in primary mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modabber, Ali, Ayoub, Nassim, Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian, Goloborodko, Evgeny, Sönmez, Tolga Taha, Ghassemi, Mehrangiz, Loberg, Christina, Lethaus, Bernd, Ghassemi, Alireza, Hölzle, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966700
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S62698
_version_ 1782322001323491328
author Modabber, Ali
Ayoub, Nassim
Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian
Goloborodko, Evgeny
Sönmez, Tolga Taha
Ghassemi, Mehrangiz
Loberg, Christina
Lethaus, Bernd
Ghassemi, Alireza
Hölzle, Frank
author_facet Modabber, Ali
Ayoub, Nassim
Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian
Goloborodko, Evgeny
Sönmez, Tolga Taha
Ghassemi, Mehrangiz
Loberg, Christina
Lethaus, Bernd
Ghassemi, Alireza
Hölzle, Frank
author_sort Modabber, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The intention of mandibular reconstruction is to restore the complex anatomy with maximum possible functionality and high accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in primary mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap compared with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography data of the mandible and the iliac crest or fibula donor site were imported into a specific surgical planning software program. Surgical guides were manufactured using a rapid prototyping technique for translating the virtual plan, including information on the transplant dimensions and shape, into real-time surgery. Using postoperative computed tomography scans and an automatic surface-comparison algorithm, the actual postoperative situation was compared with the preoperative virtual simulation. RESULTS: The actual flap position showed a mean difference from the virtual plan of 2.43 mm (standard deviation [SD] ±1.26) and a surface deviation of 39% <2 mm and 15% <1 mm for the iliac crest bone flap, and a mean difference of 2.18 mm (SD ±1.93) and a surface deviation of 60% <2 mm and 37% <1 mm for the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. The position of the neomandible reconstructed with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap indicated a mean difference from the virtual plan of 1.25 mm (SD ±1.31) and a surface deviation of 82% <2 mm and 57% <1 mm, in contrast to a mean difference of 1.68 mm (SD ±1.25) and a surface deviation of 63% <2 mm and 38% <1 mm for the neomandible after reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap. For shape analysis, a similarly high accuracy could be calculated for both flaps. CONCLUSION: Virtual surgical planning is an effective method for mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps, and can help to restore the anatomy of the mandible with high accuracy in position and shape. It seems that primary mandibular reconstruction with the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap is more accurate compared with the vascularized iliac crest bone flap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4064953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40649532014-06-25 The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap Modabber, Ali Ayoub, Nassim Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian Goloborodko, Evgeny Sönmez, Tolga Taha Ghassemi, Mehrangiz Loberg, Christina Lethaus, Bernd Ghassemi, Alireza Hölzle, Frank Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: The intention of mandibular reconstruction is to restore the complex anatomy with maximum possible functionality and high accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in primary mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap compared with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography data of the mandible and the iliac crest or fibula donor site were imported into a specific surgical planning software program. Surgical guides were manufactured using a rapid prototyping technique for translating the virtual plan, including information on the transplant dimensions and shape, into real-time surgery. Using postoperative computed tomography scans and an automatic surface-comparison algorithm, the actual postoperative situation was compared with the preoperative virtual simulation. RESULTS: The actual flap position showed a mean difference from the virtual plan of 2.43 mm (standard deviation [SD] ±1.26) and a surface deviation of 39% <2 mm and 15% <1 mm for the iliac crest bone flap, and a mean difference of 2.18 mm (SD ±1.93) and a surface deviation of 60% <2 mm and 37% <1 mm for the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. The position of the neomandible reconstructed with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap indicated a mean difference from the virtual plan of 1.25 mm (SD ±1.31) and a surface deviation of 82% <2 mm and 57% <1 mm, in contrast to a mean difference of 1.68 mm (SD ±1.25) and a surface deviation of 63% <2 mm and 38% <1 mm for the neomandible after reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap. For shape analysis, a similarly high accuracy could be calculated for both flaps. CONCLUSION: Virtual surgical planning is an effective method for mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps, and can help to restore the anatomy of the mandible with high accuracy in position and shape. It seems that primary mandibular reconstruction with the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap is more accurate compared with the vascularized iliac crest bone flap. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4064953/ /pubmed/24966700 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S62698 Text en © 2014 Modabber et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Modabber, Ali
Ayoub, Nassim
Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian
Goloborodko, Evgeny
Sönmez, Tolga Taha
Ghassemi, Mehrangiz
Loberg, Christina
Lethaus, Bernd
Ghassemi, Alireza
Hölzle, Frank
The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
title The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
title_full The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
title_fullStr The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
title_short The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
title_sort accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966700
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S62698
work_keys_str_mv AT modabberali theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT ayoubnassim theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT mohlhenrichstephanchristian theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT goloborodkoevgeny theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT sonmeztolgataha theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT ghassemimehrangiz theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT lobergchristina theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT lethausbernd theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT ghassemialireza theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT holzlefrank theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT modabberali accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT ayoubnassim accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT mohlhenrichstephanchristian accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT goloborodkoevgeny accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT sonmeztolgataha accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT ghassemimehrangiz accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT lobergchristina accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT lethausbernd accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT ghassemialireza accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap
AT holzlefrank accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap