Cargando…
The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap
BACKGROUND: The intention of mandibular reconstruction is to restore the complex anatomy with maximum possible functionality and high accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in primary mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966700 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S62698 |
_version_ | 1782322001323491328 |
---|---|
author | Modabber, Ali Ayoub, Nassim Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian Goloborodko, Evgeny Sönmez, Tolga Taha Ghassemi, Mehrangiz Loberg, Christina Lethaus, Bernd Ghassemi, Alireza Hölzle, Frank |
author_facet | Modabber, Ali Ayoub, Nassim Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian Goloborodko, Evgeny Sönmez, Tolga Taha Ghassemi, Mehrangiz Loberg, Christina Lethaus, Bernd Ghassemi, Alireza Hölzle, Frank |
author_sort | Modabber, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The intention of mandibular reconstruction is to restore the complex anatomy with maximum possible functionality and high accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in primary mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap compared with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography data of the mandible and the iliac crest or fibula donor site were imported into a specific surgical planning software program. Surgical guides were manufactured using a rapid prototyping technique for translating the virtual plan, including information on the transplant dimensions and shape, into real-time surgery. Using postoperative computed tomography scans and an automatic surface-comparison algorithm, the actual postoperative situation was compared with the preoperative virtual simulation. RESULTS: The actual flap position showed a mean difference from the virtual plan of 2.43 mm (standard deviation [SD] ±1.26) and a surface deviation of 39% <2 mm and 15% <1 mm for the iliac crest bone flap, and a mean difference of 2.18 mm (SD ±1.93) and a surface deviation of 60% <2 mm and 37% <1 mm for the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. The position of the neomandible reconstructed with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap indicated a mean difference from the virtual plan of 1.25 mm (SD ±1.31) and a surface deviation of 82% <2 mm and 57% <1 mm, in contrast to a mean difference of 1.68 mm (SD ±1.25) and a surface deviation of 63% <2 mm and 38% <1 mm for the neomandible after reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap. For shape analysis, a similarly high accuracy could be calculated for both flaps. CONCLUSION: Virtual surgical planning is an effective method for mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps, and can help to restore the anatomy of the mandible with high accuracy in position and shape. It seems that primary mandibular reconstruction with the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap is more accurate compared with the vascularized iliac crest bone flap. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4064953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40649532014-06-25 The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap Modabber, Ali Ayoub, Nassim Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian Goloborodko, Evgeny Sönmez, Tolga Taha Ghassemi, Mehrangiz Loberg, Christina Lethaus, Bernd Ghassemi, Alireza Hölzle, Frank Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: The intention of mandibular reconstruction is to restore the complex anatomy with maximum possible functionality and high accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in primary mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap compared with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography data of the mandible and the iliac crest or fibula donor site were imported into a specific surgical planning software program. Surgical guides were manufactured using a rapid prototyping technique for translating the virtual plan, including information on the transplant dimensions and shape, into real-time surgery. Using postoperative computed tomography scans and an automatic surface-comparison algorithm, the actual postoperative situation was compared with the preoperative virtual simulation. RESULTS: The actual flap position showed a mean difference from the virtual plan of 2.43 mm (standard deviation [SD] ±1.26) and a surface deviation of 39% <2 mm and 15% <1 mm for the iliac crest bone flap, and a mean difference of 2.18 mm (SD ±1.93) and a surface deviation of 60% <2 mm and 37% <1 mm for the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. The position of the neomandible reconstructed with an osteomyocutaneous fibula flap indicated a mean difference from the virtual plan of 1.25 mm (SD ±1.31) and a surface deviation of 82% <2 mm and 57% <1 mm, in contrast to a mean difference of 1.68 mm (SD ±1.25) and a surface deviation of 63% <2 mm and 38% <1 mm for the neomandible after reconstruction with an iliac crest bone flap. For shape analysis, a similarly high accuracy could be calculated for both flaps. CONCLUSION: Virtual surgical planning is an effective method for mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps, and can help to restore the anatomy of the mandible with high accuracy in position and shape. It seems that primary mandibular reconstruction with the osteomyocutaneous fibula flap is more accurate compared with the vascularized iliac crest bone flap. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4064953/ /pubmed/24966700 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S62698 Text en © 2014 Modabber et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Modabber, Ali Ayoub, Nassim Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian Goloborodko, Evgeny Sönmez, Tolga Taha Ghassemi, Mehrangiz Loberg, Christina Lethaus, Bernd Ghassemi, Alireza Hölzle, Frank The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap |
title | The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap |
title_full | The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap |
title_short | The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap |
title_sort | accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966700 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S62698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modabberali theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT ayoubnassim theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT mohlhenrichstephanchristian theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT goloborodkoevgeny theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT sonmeztolgataha theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT ghassemimehrangiz theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT lobergchristina theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT lethausbernd theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT ghassemialireza theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT holzlefrank theaccuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT modabberali accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT ayoubnassim accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT mohlhenrichstephanchristian accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT goloborodkoevgeny accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT sonmeztolgataha accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT ghassemimehrangiz accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT lobergchristina accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT lethausbernd accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT ghassemialireza accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap AT holzlefrank accuracyofcomputerassistedprimarymandibularreconstructionwithvascularizedboneflapsiliaccrestboneflapversusosteomyocutaneousfibulaflap |