Cargando…

Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values

BACKGROUND: The use of alternative modeling techniques for predicting patient survival is complicated by the fact that some alternative techniques cannot readily deal with censoring, which is essential for analyzing survival data. In the current study, we aimed to demonstrate that pseudo values enab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Ploeg, Tjeerd, Datema, Frank, Baatenburg de Jong, Robert, Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24950066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100234
_version_ 1782322012870410240
author van der Ploeg, Tjeerd
Datema, Frank
Baatenburg de Jong, Robert
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
author_facet van der Ploeg, Tjeerd
Datema, Frank
Baatenburg de Jong, Robert
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
author_sort van der Ploeg, Tjeerd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of alternative modeling techniques for predicting patient survival is complicated by the fact that some alternative techniques cannot readily deal with censoring, which is essential for analyzing survival data. In the current study, we aimed to demonstrate that pseudo values enable statistically appropriate analyses of survival outcomes when used in seven alternative modeling techniques. METHODS: In this case study, we analyzed survival of 1282 Dutch patients with newly diagnosed Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) with conventional Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. We subsequently calculated pseudo values to reflect the individual survival patterns. We used these pseudo values to compare recursive partitioning (RPART), neural nets (NNET), logistic regression (LR) general linear models (GLM) and three variants of support vector machines (SVM) with respect to dichotomous 60-month survival, and continuous pseudo values at 60 months or estimated survival time. We used the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the root of the mean squared error (RMSE) to compare the performance of these models using bootstrap validation. RESULTS: Of a total of 1282 patients, 986 patients died during a median follow-up of 66 months (60-month survival: 52% [95% CI: 50%−55%]). The LR model had the highest optimism corrected AUC (0.791) to predict 60-month survival, followed by the SVM model with a linear kernel (AUC 0.787). The GLM model had the smallest optimism corrected RMSE when continuous pseudo values were considered for 60-month survival or the estimated survival time followed by SVM models with a linear kernel. The estimated importance of predictors varied substantially by the specific aspect of survival studied and modeling technique used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pseudo values makes it readily possible to apply alternative modeling techniques to survival problems, to compare their performance and to search further for promising alternative modeling techniques to analyze survival time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4065009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40650092014-06-25 Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values van der Ploeg, Tjeerd Datema, Frank Baatenburg de Jong, Robert Steyerberg, Ewout W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of alternative modeling techniques for predicting patient survival is complicated by the fact that some alternative techniques cannot readily deal with censoring, which is essential for analyzing survival data. In the current study, we aimed to demonstrate that pseudo values enable statistically appropriate analyses of survival outcomes when used in seven alternative modeling techniques. METHODS: In this case study, we analyzed survival of 1282 Dutch patients with newly diagnosed Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) with conventional Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. We subsequently calculated pseudo values to reflect the individual survival patterns. We used these pseudo values to compare recursive partitioning (RPART), neural nets (NNET), logistic regression (LR) general linear models (GLM) and three variants of support vector machines (SVM) with respect to dichotomous 60-month survival, and continuous pseudo values at 60 months or estimated survival time. We used the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the root of the mean squared error (RMSE) to compare the performance of these models using bootstrap validation. RESULTS: Of a total of 1282 patients, 986 patients died during a median follow-up of 66 months (60-month survival: 52% [95% CI: 50%−55%]). The LR model had the highest optimism corrected AUC (0.791) to predict 60-month survival, followed by the SVM model with a linear kernel (AUC 0.787). The GLM model had the smallest optimism corrected RMSE when continuous pseudo values were considered for 60-month survival or the estimated survival time followed by SVM models with a linear kernel. The estimated importance of predictors varied substantially by the specific aspect of survival studied and modeling technique used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pseudo values makes it readily possible to apply alternative modeling techniques to survival problems, to compare their performance and to search further for promising alternative modeling techniques to analyze survival time. Public Library of Science 2014-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4065009/ /pubmed/24950066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100234 Text en © 2014 van der Ploeg et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Ploeg, Tjeerd
Datema, Frank
Baatenburg de Jong, Robert
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values
title Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values
title_full Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values
title_fullStr Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values
title_short Prediction of Survival with Alternative Modeling Techniques Using Pseudo Values
title_sort prediction of survival with alternative modeling techniques using pseudo values
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24950066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100234
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderploegtjeerd predictionofsurvivalwithalternativemodelingtechniquesusingpseudovalues
AT datemafrank predictionofsurvivalwithalternativemodelingtechniquesusingpseudovalues
AT baatenburgdejongrobert predictionofsurvivalwithalternativemodelingtechniquesusingpseudovalues
AT steyerbergewoutw predictionofsurvivalwithalternativemodelingtechniquesusingpseudovalues