Cargando…
Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24920518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-93 |
_version_ | 1782322028206882816 |
---|---|
author | McGillion, Michael Hugh Carroll, Sandra Lee Metcalfe, Kelly Arthur, Heather Mary Victor, Joseph Charles McKelvie, Robert Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle Stone, James Svorkdal, Nelson Hanlon, John George Andrade, Ada Niznick, Joel Malysh, Louise McDonald, William Stevens, Bonnie Coyte, Peter Stacey, Dawn |
author_facet | McGillion, Michael Hugh Carroll, Sandra Lee Metcalfe, Kelly Arthur, Heather Mary Victor, Joseph Charles McKelvie, Robert Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle Stone, James Svorkdal, Nelson Hanlon, John George Andrade, Ada Niznick, Joel Malysh, Louise McDonald, William Stevens, Bonnie Coyte, Peter Stacey, Dawn |
author_sort | McGillion, Michael Hugh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergency departments for help, undergo repeated cardiac investigations, and struggle with obtaining appropriate care. There is no clear framework to help people understand the risks and benefits of available treatment options in Canada. Some treatments for refractory angina are invasive, while others are not covered by provincial health insurance plans. Effective care for refractory angina sufferers in Canada is critically underdeveloped; it is important that healthcare professionals and refractory angina sufferers alike understand the treatment options and their implications. This proposal builds on the recent Canadian practice guidelines for the management of refractory angina. We propose to develop a decision support tool in order to help people suffering from refractory angina make well-informed decisions about their healthcare and reduce their uncertainty about treatment options. METHODS: This project will be conducted in three phases: a) development of the support tool with input from clinical experts, the Canadian refractory angina guidelines, and people living with refractory angina, b) pilot testing of the usability of the tool, and c) formal preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the support tool to help people make informed decisions about treatment options. DISCUSSION: A decision support tool for refractory angina is needed and the available data suggest that by developing such a tool, we may be able to help refractory angina sufferers better understand their condition and the effectiveness of available treatment options (in their respective clinical settings) as well as their implications (e.g. risks vs. benefits). By virtue of this tool, we may also be able to facilitate identification and inclusion of patients’ values and preferences in the decision making process. This is particularly important as refractory angina is an intractable condition, necessitating that the selected course of treatment be lifelong. This study will yield a much needed patient decision aid for people living with refractory angina and pilot data to support a subsequent effectiveness study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4065088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40650882014-06-21 Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study McGillion, Michael Hugh Carroll, Sandra Lee Metcalfe, Kelly Arthur, Heather Mary Victor, Joseph Charles McKelvie, Robert Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle Stone, James Svorkdal, Nelson Hanlon, John George Andrade, Ada Niznick, Joel Malysh, Louise McDonald, William Stevens, Bonnie Coyte, Peter Stacey, Dawn Health Qual Life Outcomes Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergency departments for help, undergo repeated cardiac investigations, and struggle with obtaining appropriate care. There is no clear framework to help people understand the risks and benefits of available treatment options in Canada. Some treatments for refractory angina are invasive, while others are not covered by provincial health insurance plans. Effective care for refractory angina sufferers in Canada is critically underdeveloped; it is important that healthcare professionals and refractory angina sufferers alike understand the treatment options and their implications. This proposal builds on the recent Canadian practice guidelines for the management of refractory angina. We propose to develop a decision support tool in order to help people suffering from refractory angina make well-informed decisions about their healthcare and reduce their uncertainty about treatment options. METHODS: This project will be conducted in three phases: a) development of the support tool with input from clinical experts, the Canadian refractory angina guidelines, and people living with refractory angina, b) pilot testing of the usability of the tool, and c) formal preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the support tool to help people make informed decisions about treatment options. DISCUSSION: A decision support tool for refractory angina is needed and the available data suggest that by developing such a tool, we may be able to help refractory angina sufferers better understand their condition and the effectiveness of available treatment options (in their respective clinical settings) as well as their implications (e.g. risks vs. benefits). By virtue of this tool, we may also be able to facilitate identification and inclusion of patients’ values and preferences in the decision making process. This is particularly important as refractory angina is an intractable condition, necessitating that the selected course of treatment be lifelong. This study will yield a much needed patient decision aid for people living with refractory angina and pilot data to support a subsequent effectiveness study. BioMed Central 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4065088/ /pubmed/24920518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-93 Text en Copyright © 2014 McGillion et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol McGillion, Michael Hugh Carroll, Sandra Lee Metcalfe, Kelly Arthur, Heather Mary Victor, Joseph Charles McKelvie, Robert Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle Stone, James Svorkdal, Nelson Hanlon, John George Andrade, Ada Niznick, Joel Malysh, Louise McDonald, William Stevens, Bonnie Coyte, Peter Stacey, Dawn Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study |
title | Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study |
title_full | Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study |
title_fullStr | Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study |
title_short | Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study |
title_sort | development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24920518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-93 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgillionmichaelhugh developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT carrollsandralee developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT metcalfekelly developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT arthurheathermary developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT victorjosephcharles developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT mckelvierobert developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT jolicoeuretiennemarc developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT lessardmariegabrielle developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT stonejames developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT svorkdalnelson developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT hanlonjohngeorge developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT andradeada developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT niznickjoel developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT malyshlouise developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT mcdonaldwilliam developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT stevensbonnie developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT coytepeter developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy AT staceydawn developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy |