Cargando…

Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study

BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGillion, Michael Hugh, Carroll, Sandra Lee, Metcalfe, Kelly, Arthur, Heather Mary, Victor, Joseph Charles, McKelvie, Robert, Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc, Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle, Stone, James, Svorkdal, Nelson, Hanlon, John George, Andrade, Ada, Niznick, Joel, Malysh, Louise, McDonald, William, Stevens, Bonnie, Coyte, Peter, Stacey, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24920518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-93
_version_ 1782322028206882816
author McGillion, Michael Hugh
Carroll, Sandra Lee
Metcalfe, Kelly
Arthur, Heather Mary
Victor, Joseph Charles
McKelvie, Robert
Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc
Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle
Stone, James
Svorkdal, Nelson
Hanlon, John George
Andrade, Ada
Niznick, Joel
Malysh, Louise
McDonald, William
Stevens, Bonnie
Coyte, Peter
Stacey, Dawn
author_facet McGillion, Michael Hugh
Carroll, Sandra Lee
Metcalfe, Kelly
Arthur, Heather Mary
Victor, Joseph Charles
McKelvie, Robert
Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc
Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle
Stone, James
Svorkdal, Nelson
Hanlon, John George
Andrade, Ada
Niznick, Joel
Malysh, Louise
McDonald, William
Stevens, Bonnie
Coyte, Peter
Stacey, Dawn
author_sort McGillion, Michael Hugh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergency departments for help, undergo repeated cardiac investigations, and struggle with obtaining appropriate care. There is no clear framework to help people understand the risks and benefits of available treatment options in Canada. Some treatments for refractory angina are invasive, while others are not covered by provincial health insurance plans. Effective care for refractory angina sufferers in Canada is critically underdeveloped; it is important that healthcare professionals and refractory angina sufferers alike understand the treatment options and their implications. This proposal builds on the recent Canadian practice guidelines for the management of refractory angina. We propose to develop a decision support tool in order to help people suffering from refractory angina make well-informed decisions about their healthcare and reduce their uncertainty about treatment options. METHODS: This project will be conducted in three phases: a) development of the support tool with input from clinical experts, the Canadian refractory angina guidelines, and people living with refractory angina, b) pilot testing of the usability of the tool, and c) formal preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the support tool to help people make informed decisions about treatment options. DISCUSSION: A decision support tool for refractory angina is needed and the available data suggest that by developing such a tool, we may be able to help refractory angina sufferers better understand their condition and the effectiveness of available treatment options (in their respective clinical settings) as well as their implications (e.g. risks vs. benefits). By virtue of this tool, we may also be able to facilitate identification and inclusion of patients’ values and preferences in the decision making process. This is particularly important as refractory angina is an intractable condition, necessitating that the selected course of treatment be lifelong. This study will yield a much needed patient decision aid for people living with refractory angina and pilot data to support a subsequent effectiveness study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4065088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40650882014-06-21 Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study McGillion, Michael Hugh Carroll, Sandra Lee Metcalfe, Kelly Arthur, Heather Mary Victor, Joseph Charles McKelvie, Robert Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle Stone, James Svorkdal, Nelson Hanlon, John George Andrade, Ada Niznick, Joel Malysh, Louise McDonald, William Stevens, Bonnie Coyte, Peter Stacey, Dawn Health Qual Life Outcomes Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergency departments for help, undergo repeated cardiac investigations, and struggle with obtaining appropriate care. There is no clear framework to help people understand the risks and benefits of available treatment options in Canada. Some treatments for refractory angina are invasive, while others are not covered by provincial health insurance plans. Effective care for refractory angina sufferers in Canada is critically underdeveloped; it is important that healthcare professionals and refractory angina sufferers alike understand the treatment options and their implications. This proposal builds on the recent Canadian practice guidelines for the management of refractory angina. We propose to develop a decision support tool in order to help people suffering from refractory angina make well-informed decisions about their healthcare and reduce their uncertainty about treatment options. METHODS: This project will be conducted in three phases: a) development of the support tool with input from clinical experts, the Canadian refractory angina guidelines, and people living with refractory angina, b) pilot testing of the usability of the tool, and c) formal preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the support tool to help people make informed decisions about treatment options. DISCUSSION: A decision support tool for refractory angina is needed and the available data suggest that by developing such a tool, we may be able to help refractory angina sufferers better understand their condition and the effectiveness of available treatment options (in their respective clinical settings) as well as their implications (e.g. risks vs. benefits). By virtue of this tool, we may also be able to facilitate identification and inclusion of patients’ values and preferences in the decision making process. This is particularly important as refractory angina is an intractable condition, necessitating that the selected course of treatment be lifelong. This study will yield a much needed patient decision aid for people living with refractory angina and pilot data to support a subsequent effectiveness study. BioMed Central 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4065088/ /pubmed/24920518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-93 Text en Copyright © 2014 McGillion et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
McGillion, Michael Hugh
Carroll, Sandra Lee
Metcalfe, Kelly
Arthur, Heather Mary
Victor, Joseph Charles
McKelvie, Robert
Jolicoeur, Etienne Marc
Lessard, Marie-Gabrielle
Stone, James
Svorkdal, Nelson
Hanlon, John George
Andrade, Ada
Niznick, Joel
Malysh, Louise
McDonald, William
Stevens, Bonnie
Coyte, Peter
Stacey, Dawn
Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
title Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
title_full Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
title_fullStr Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
title_short Development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
title_sort development of a patient decision aid for people with refractory angina: protocol for a three-phase pilot study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24920518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-93
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgillionmichaelhugh developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT carrollsandralee developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT metcalfekelly developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT arthurheathermary developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT victorjosephcharles developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT mckelvierobert developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT jolicoeuretiennemarc developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT lessardmariegabrielle developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT stonejames developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT svorkdalnelson developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT hanlonjohngeorge developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT andradeada developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT niznickjoel developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT malyshlouise developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT mcdonaldwilliam developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT stevensbonnie developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT coytepeter developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy
AT staceydawn developmentofapatientdecisionaidforpeoplewithrefractoryanginaprotocolforathreephasepilotstudy