Cargando…

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerability of Vildagliptin and Other Oral Glucose-Lowering Therapies in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Germany

INTRODUCTION: Metformin is an established first-line treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but treatment intensification with other oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) is usually required over time. Effectiveness of diabetes control with vildagliptin and vildagliptin/metformin was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Göke, Rüdiger, Bader, Giovanni, Dworak, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0060-4
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Metformin is an established first-line treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but treatment intensification with other oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) is usually required over time. Effectiveness of diabetes control with vildagliptin and vildagliptin/metformin was a 1-year, large observational study of 45,868 patients with T2DM across 27 countries which assessed effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin as add-on therapy to other OADs versus other comparator OAD combinations. Here, we present the data from Germany. METHODS: Patients inadequately controlled with monotherapy were eligible only after the add-on treatment was finalized. Patients were assigned to either vildagliptin or comparator OADs [sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, glinides, α-glucosidase inhibitors or metformin, excluding dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 mimetic/analogues]. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) reduction of >0.3% without peripheral edema, hypoglycemia, discontinuation due to a gastrointestinal event or weight gain ≥5%. One secondary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving HbA(1c) <7% without hypoglycemia and weight gain. Change in HbA(1c) from baseline to study endpoint and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Of 8,887 patients enrolled in Germany, 6,679 received vildagliptin and 1,695 received other OADs. The mean ± SD baseline age, HbA(1c), and T2DM duration were 62.8 ± 11.0 years, 7.7 ± 1.2%, and 5.8 ± 4.9 years, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving the primary (34.5% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.01) and secondary (25.4% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.01) endpoints was higher with vildagliptin than comparator OADs. Vildagliptin showed a numerically greater reduction in HbA(1c) (0.7%) from baseline vs. comparator OADs (0.6%). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar. CONCLUSION: In real life, treatment with vildagliptin is associated with a higher proportion of patients reaching target HbA(1c) without hypoglycemia and weight gain compared with other OADs in Germany. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0060-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.