Cargando…
Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
BACKGROUND: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24515263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6 |
_version_ | 1782322065929404416 |
---|---|
author | Kitagami, Hidehiko Morimoto, Mamoru Nozawa, Masashi Nakamura, Kenichi Tanimura, Shinya Murakawa, Katsuhiko Murakami, Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Kenji Ushigome, Hajime Sato, Leo Yamamoto, Minoru Shimizu, Yasunobu Hayakawa, Tetsushi Tanaka, Moritsugu Hirano, Satoshi |
author_facet | Kitagami, Hidehiko Morimoto, Mamoru Nozawa, Masashi Nakamura, Kenichi Tanimura, Shinya Murakawa, Katsuhiko Murakami, Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Kenji Ushigome, Hajime Sato, Leo Yamamoto, Minoru Shimizu, Yasunobu Hayakawa, Tetsushi Tanaka, Moritsugu Hirano, Satoshi |
author_sort | Kitagami, Hidehiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with the aim to clarify the utility of Delta. METHODS: Stage 1 gastric cancer patients who had undergone LDG with Delta (group D, n = 68) and those who had undergone LDG with RY (group RY, n = 60) were compared in terms of operative outcomes, postoperative clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal fiberscopic findings, and changes in body weight. RESULTS: Both the operative and anastomotic times were significantly shorter in group D (230 and 13 min, respectively) than in group RY (258 and 38 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the complications observed at the anastomotic site, obstruction was seen in one group D patient and two group RY patients but was relieved with conservative management. Postoperative clinical symptoms were reported for 26.4 % of the group D patients but had decreased to 5.9 % 1 year later. Group RY yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy performed 1 year postoperatively showed no intergroup differences in the incidence of gastritis or residual retention and a significantly more frequent occurrence of bile reflux in group D. Postoperative weight changes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delta reconstruction after LDG is a safe and effective procedure that is totally laparoscopic, less time consuming, and associated with a favorable postoperative course and a better quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4065338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40653382014-06-23 Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis Kitagami, Hidehiko Morimoto, Mamoru Nozawa, Masashi Nakamura, Kenichi Tanimura, Shinya Murakawa, Katsuhiko Murakami, Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Kenji Ushigome, Hajime Sato, Leo Yamamoto, Minoru Shimizu, Yasunobu Hayakawa, Tetsushi Tanaka, Moritsugu Hirano, Satoshi Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with the aim to clarify the utility of Delta. METHODS: Stage 1 gastric cancer patients who had undergone LDG with Delta (group D, n = 68) and those who had undergone LDG with RY (group RY, n = 60) were compared in terms of operative outcomes, postoperative clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal fiberscopic findings, and changes in body weight. RESULTS: Both the operative and anastomotic times were significantly shorter in group D (230 and 13 min, respectively) than in group RY (258 and 38 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the complications observed at the anastomotic site, obstruction was seen in one group D patient and two group RY patients but was relieved with conservative management. Postoperative clinical symptoms were reported for 26.4 % of the group D patients but had decreased to 5.9 % 1 year later. Group RY yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy performed 1 year postoperatively showed no intergroup differences in the incidence of gastritis or residual retention and a significantly more frequent occurrence of bile reflux in group D. Postoperative weight changes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delta reconstruction after LDG is a safe and effective procedure that is totally laparoscopic, less time consuming, and associated with a favorable postoperative course and a better quality of life. Springer US 2014-02-12 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4065338/ /pubmed/24515263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Kitagami, Hidehiko Morimoto, Mamoru Nozawa, Masashi Nakamura, Kenichi Tanimura, Shinya Murakawa, Katsuhiko Murakami, Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Kenji Ushigome, Hajime Sato, Leo Yamamoto, Minoru Shimizu, Yasunobu Hayakawa, Tetsushi Tanaka, Moritsugu Hirano, Satoshi Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis |
title | Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis |
title_full | Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis |
title_short | Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis |
title_sort | evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with roux-en-y anastomosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24515263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitagamihidehiko evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT morimotomamoru evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT nozawamasashi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT nakamurakenichi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT tanimurashinya evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT murakawakatsuhiko evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT murakamiyoshihiro evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT kikuchikenji evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT ushigomehajime evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT satoleo evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT yamamotominoru evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT shimizuyasunobu evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT hayakawatetsushi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT tanakamoritsugu evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis AT hiranosatoshi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis |