Cargando…

Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis

BACKGROUND: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitagami, Hidehiko, Morimoto, Mamoru, Nozawa, Masashi, Nakamura, Kenichi, Tanimura, Shinya, Murakawa, Katsuhiko, Murakami, Yoshihiro, Kikuchi, Kenji, Ushigome, Hajime, Sato, Leo, Yamamoto, Minoru, Shimizu, Yasunobu, Hayakawa, Tetsushi, Tanaka, Moritsugu, Hirano, Satoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24515263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6
_version_ 1782322065929404416
author Kitagami, Hidehiko
Morimoto, Mamoru
Nozawa, Masashi
Nakamura, Kenichi
Tanimura, Shinya
Murakawa, Katsuhiko
Murakami, Yoshihiro
Kikuchi, Kenji
Ushigome, Hajime
Sato, Leo
Yamamoto, Minoru
Shimizu, Yasunobu
Hayakawa, Tetsushi
Tanaka, Moritsugu
Hirano, Satoshi
author_facet Kitagami, Hidehiko
Morimoto, Mamoru
Nozawa, Masashi
Nakamura, Kenichi
Tanimura, Shinya
Murakawa, Katsuhiko
Murakami, Yoshihiro
Kikuchi, Kenji
Ushigome, Hajime
Sato, Leo
Yamamoto, Minoru
Shimizu, Yasunobu
Hayakawa, Tetsushi
Tanaka, Moritsugu
Hirano, Satoshi
author_sort Kitagami, Hidehiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with the aim to clarify the utility of Delta. METHODS: Stage 1 gastric cancer patients who had undergone LDG with Delta (group D, n = 68) and those who had undergone LDG with RY (group RY, n = 60) were compared in terms of operative outcomes, postoperative clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal fiberscopic findings, and changes in body weight. RESULTS: Both the operative and anastomotic times were significantly shorter in group D (230 and 13 min, respectively) than in group RY (258 and 38 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the complications observed at the anastomotic site, obstruction was seen in one group D patient and two group RY patients but was relieved with conservative management. Postoperative clinical symptoms were reported for 26.4 % of the group D patients but had decreased to 5.9 % 1 year later. Group RY yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy performed 1 year postoperatively showed no intergroup differences in the incidence of gastritis or residual retention and a significantly more frequent occurrence of bile reflux in group D. Postoperative weight changes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delta reconstruction after LDG is a safe and effective procedure that is totally laparoscopic, less time consuming, and associated with a favorable postoperative course and a better quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4065338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40653382014-06-23 Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis Kitagami, Hidehiko Morimoto, Mamoru Nozawa, Masashi Nakamura, Kenichi Tanimura, Shinya Murakawa, Katsuhiko Murakami, Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Kenji Ushigome, Hajime Sato, Leo Yamamoto, Minoru Shimizu, Yasunobu Hayakawa, Tetsushi Tanaka, Moritsugu Hirano, Satoshi Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with the aim to clarify the utility of Delta. METHODS: Stage 1 gastric cancer patients who had undergone LDG with Delta (group D, n = 68) and those who had undergone LDG with RY (group RY, n = 60) were compared in terms of operative outcomes, postoperative clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal fiberscopic findings, and changes in body weight. RESULTS: Both the operative and anastomotic times were significantly shorter in group D (230 and 13 min, respectively) than in group RY (258 and 38 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the complications observed at the anastomotic site, obstruction was seen in one group D patient and two group RY patients but was relieved with conservative management. Postoperative clinical symptoms were reported for 26.4 % of the group D patients but had decreased to 5.9 % 1 year later. Group RY yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy performed 1 year postoperatively showed no intergroup differences in the incidence of gastritis or residual retention and a significantly more frequent occurrence of bile reflux in group D. Postoperative weight changes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delta reconstruction after LDG is a safe and effective procedure that is totally laparoscopic, less time consuming, and associated with a favorable postoperative course and a better quality of life. Springer US 2014-02-12 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4065338/ /pubmed/24515263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Kitagami, Hidehiko
Morimoto, Mamoru
Nozawa, Masashi
Nakamura, Kenichi
Tanimura, Shinya
Murakawa, Katsuhiko
Murakami, Yoshihiro
Kikuchi, Kenji
Ushigome, Hajime
Sato, Leo
Yamamoto, Minoru
Shimizu, Yasunobu
Hayakawa, Tetsushi
Tanaka, Moritsugu
Hirano, Satoshi
Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
title Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
title_full Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
title_short Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
title_sort evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with roux-en-y anastomosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24515263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kitagamihidehiko evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT morimotomamoru evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT nozawamasashi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT nakamurakenichi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT tanimurashinya evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT murakawakatsuhiko evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT murakamiyoshihiro evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT kikuchikenji evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT ushigomehajime evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT satoleo evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT yamamotominoru evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT shimizuyasunobu evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT hayakawatetsushi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT tanakamoritsugu evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis
AT hiranosatoshi evaluationofthedeltashapedanastomosisinlaparoscopicdistalgastrectomymidtermresultsofacomparisonwithrouxenyanastomosis