Cargando…

HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: A vaccine could substantially impact the HIV epidemic, but inadequate uptake is a serious concern. Unfortunately, people who use drugs, particularly those residing in rural communities, have been underrepresented in previous research on HIV vaccine acceptability. This study examined HIV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, April M, DiClemente, Ralph J, Halgin, Daniel S, Sterk, Claire E, Havens, Jennifer R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-537
_version_ 1782322112468353024
author Young, April M
DiClemente, Ralph J
Halgin, Daniel S
Sterk, Claire E
Havens, Jennifer R
author_facet Young, April M
DiClemente, Ralph J
Halgin, Daniel S
Sterk, Claire E
Havens, Jennifer R
author_sort Young, April M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A vaccine could substantially impact the HIV epidemic, but inadequate uptake is a serious concern. Unfortunately, people who use drugs, particularly those residing in rural communities, have been underrepresented in previous research on HIV vaccine acceptability. This study examined HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in a rural community in the United States. METHODS: Interviewer-administered questionnaires included questions about risk behavior and attitudes toward HIV vaccination from 433 HIV-negative drug users (76% with history of injection) enrolled in a cohort study in Central Appalachia. HIV vaccine acceptability was measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine correlates to self-report of being “very likely” to receive a 90% effective HIV vaccine (i.e. “maximum vaccine acceptability”, or MVA). Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. RESULTS: Most (91%) reported that they would accept a preventive HIV vaccine, but concerns about cost, dosing, transportation constraints, vaccine-induced seropositivity, and confidentiality were expressed. Cash incentives, oral-administration, and peer/partner encouragement were anticipated facilitators of uptake. In multivariate analysis, men were significantly less likely to report MVA (AOR: 0.33, CI: 0.21 – 0.52). MVA was more common among participants who believed that they were susceptible to HIV (AOR: 2.31, CI: 1.28 – 4.07), that an HIV vaccine would benefit them (AOR: 2.80, CI: 1.70 – 4.64), and who had positive experiential attitudes toward HIV vaccination (AOR: 1.85, CI: 1.08 – 3.17). MVA was also more common among participants who believed that others would encourage them to get vaccinated and anticipated that their behavior would be influenced by others' encouragement (AOR: 1.81, 95% 1.09 – 3.01). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study was among the first to explore and provide evidence for feasibility of HIV vaccination in a rural, high-risk population in the United States. This study provides preliminary evidence that gender-specific targeting in vaccine promotion may be necessary to promoting vaccine uptake in this setting, particularly among men. The data also underscore the importance of addressing perceived risks and benefits, social norms, and logistical constraints in efforts to achieve widespread vaccine coverage in this high-risk population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4065595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40655952014-06-22 HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study Young, April M DiClemente, Ralph J Halgin, Daniel S Sterk, Claire E Havens, Jennifer R BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: A vaccine could substantially impact the HIV epidemic, but inadequate uptake is a serious concern. Unfortunately, people who use drugs, particularly those residing in rural communities, have been underrepresented in previous research on HIV vaccine acceptability. This study examined HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in a rural community in the United States. METHODS: Interviewer-administered questionnaires included questions about risk behavior and attitudes toward HIV vaccination from 433 HIV-negative drug users (76% with history of injection) enrolled in a cohort study in Central Appalachia. HIV vaccine acceptability was measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine correlates to self-report of being “very likely” to receive a 90% effective HIV vaccine (i.e. “maximum vaccine acceptability”, or MVA). Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. RESULTS: Most (91%) reported that they would accept a preventive HIV vaccine, but concerns about cost, dosing, transportation constraints, vaccine-induced seropositivity, and confidentiality were expressed. Cash incentives, oral-administration, and peer/partner encouragement were anticipated facilitators of uptake. In multivariate analysis, men were significantly less likely to report MVA (AOR: 0.33, CI: 0.21 – 0.52). MVA was more common among participants who believed that they were susceptible to HIV (AOR: 2.31, CI: 1.28 – 4.07), that an HIV vaccine would benefit them (AOR: 2.80, CI: 1.70 – 4.64), and who had positive experiential attitudes toward HIV vaccination (AOR: 1.85, CI: 1.08 – 3.17). MVA was also more common among participants who believed that others would encourage them to get vaccinated and anticipated that their behavior would be influenced by others' encouragement (AOR: 1.81, 95% 1.09 – 3.01). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study was among the first to explore and provide evidence for feasibility of HIV vaccination in a rural, high-risk population in the United States. This study provides preliminary evidence that gender-specific targeting in vaccine promotion may be necessary to promoting vaccine uptake in this setting, particularly among men. The data also underscore the importance of addressing perceived risks and benefits, social norms, and logistical constraints in efforts to achieve widespread vaccine coverage in this high-risk population. BioMed Central 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4065595/ /pubmed/24885970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-537 Text en Copyright © 2014 Young et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Young, April M
DiClemente, Ralph J
Halgin, Daniel S
Sterk, Claire E
Havens, Jennifer R
HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study
title HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study
title_full HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study
title_short HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study
title_sort hiv vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in appalachia: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-537
work_keys_str_mv AT youngaprilm hivvaccineacceptabilityamonghighriskdrugusersinappalachiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT diclementeralphj hivvaccineacceptabilityamonghighriskdrugusersinappalachiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT halgindaniels hivvaccineacceptabilityamonghighriskdrugusersinappalachiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT sterkclairee hivvaccineacceptabilityamonghighriskdrugusersinappalachiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT havensjenniferr hivvaccineacceptabilityamonghighriskdrugusersinappalachiaacrosssectionalstudy