Cargando…

Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something

In visual search, some fixations are made between stimuli on empty regions, commonly referred to as “centre-of-gravity” fixations (henceforth: COG fixations). Previous studies have shown that observers with task expertise show more COG fixations than novices. This led to the view that COG fixations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venini, Dustin, Remington, Roger W., Horstmann, Gernot, Becker, Stefanie I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/237812
_version_ 1782322135362961408
author Venini, Dustin
Remington, Roger W.
Horstmann, Gernot
Becker, Stefanie I.
author_facet Venini, Dustin
Remington, Roger W.
Horstmann, Gernot
Becker, Stefanie I.
author_sort Venini, Dustin
collection PubMed
description In visual search, some fixations are made between stimuli on empty regions, commonly referred to as “centre-of-gravity” fixations (henceforth: COG fixations). Previous studies have shown that observers with task expertise show more COG fixations than novices. This led to the view that COG fixations reflect simultaneous encoding of multiple stimuli, allowing more efficient processing of task-related items. The present study tested whether COG fixations also aid performance in visual search tasks with unfamiliar and abstract stimuli. Moreover, to provide evidence for the multiple-item processing view, we analysed the effects of COG fixations on the number and dwell times of stimulus fixations. The results showed that (1) search efficiency increased with increasing COG fixations even in search for unfamiliar stimuli and in the absence of special higher-order skills, (2) COG fixations reliably reduced the number of stimulus fixations and their dwell times, indicating processing of multiple distractors, and (3) the proportion of COG fixations was dynamically adapted to potential information gain of COG locations. A second experiment showed that COG fixations are diminished when stimulus positions unpredictably vary across trials. Together, the results support the multiple-item processing view, which has important implications for current theories of visual search.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4065739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40657392014-07-07 Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something Venini, Dustin Remington, Roger W. Horstmann, Gernot Becker, Stefanie I. J Ophthalmol Research Article In visual search, some fixations are made between stimuli on empty regions, commonly referred to as “centre-of-gravity” fixations (henceforth: COG fixations). Previous studies have shown that observers with task expertise show more COG fixations than novices. This led to the view that COG fixations reflect simultaneous encoding of multiple stimuli, allowing more efficient processing of task-related items. The present study tested whether COG fixations also aid performance in visual search tasks with unfamiliar and abstract stimuli. Moreover, to provide evidence for the multiple-item processing view, we analysed the effects of COG fixations on the number and dwell times of stimulus fixations. The results showed that (1) search efficiency increased with increasing COG fixations even in search for unfamiliar stimuli and in the absence of special higher-order skills, (2) COG fixations reliably reduced the number of stimulus fixations and their dwell times, indicating processing of multiple distractors, and (3) the proportion of COG fixations was dynamically adapted to potential information gain of COG locations. A second experiment showed that COG fixations are diminished when stimulus positions unpredictably vary across trials. Together, the results support the multiple-item processing view, which has important implications for current theories of visual search. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4065739/ /pubmed/25002972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/237812 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dustin Venini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Venini, Dustin
Remington, Roger W.
Horstmann, Gernot
Becker, Stefanie I.
Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something
title Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something
title_full Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something
title_fullStr Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something
title_full_unstemmed Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something
title_short Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something
title_sort centre-of-gravity fixations in visual search: when looking at nothing helps to find something
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/237812
work_keys_str_mv AT veninidustin centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething
AT remingtonrogerw centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething
AT horstmanngernot centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething
AT beckerstefaniei centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething