Cargando…
Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something
In visual search, some fixations are made between stimuli on empty regions, commonly referred to as “centre-of-gravity” fixations (henceforth: COG fixations). Previous studies have shown that observers with task expertise show more COG fixations than novices. This led to the view that COG fixations...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/237812 |
_version_ | 1782322135362961408 |
---|---|
author | Venini, Dustin Remington, Roger W. Horstmann, Gernot Becker, Stefanie I. |
author_facet | Venini, Dustin Remington, Roger W. Horstmann, Gernot Becker, Stefanie I. |
author_sort | Venini, Dustin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In visual search, some fixations are made between stimuli on empty regions, commonly referred to as “centre-of-gravity” fixations (henceforth: COG fixations). Previous studies have shown that observers with task expertise show more COG fixations than novices. This led to the view that COG fixations reflect simultaneous encoding of multiple stimuli, allowing more efficient processing of task-related items. The present study tested whether COG fixations also aid performance in visual search tasks with unfamiliar and abstract stimuli. Moreover, to provide evidence for the multiple-item processing view, we analysed the effects of COG fixations on the number and dwell times of stimulus fixations. The results showed that (1) search efficiency increased with increasing COG fixations even in search for unfamiliar stimuli and in the absence of special higher-order skills, (2) COG fixations reliably reduced the number of stimulus fixations and their dwell times, indicating processing of multiple distractors, and (3) the proportion of COG fixations was dynamically adapted to potential information gain of COG locations. A second experiment showed that COG fixations are diminished when stimulus positions unpredictably vary across trials. Together, the results support the multiple-item processing view, which has important implications for current theories of visual search. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4065739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40657392014-07-07 Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something Venini, Dustin Remington, Roger W. Horstmann, Gernot Becker, Stefanie I. J Ophthalmol Research Article In visual search, some fixations are made between stimuli on empty regions, commonly referred to as “centre-of-gravity” fixations (henceforth: COG fixations). Previous studies have shown that observers with task expertise show more COG fixations than novices. This led to the view that COG fixations reflect simultaneous encoding of multiple stimuli, allowing more efficient processing of task-related items. The present study tested whether COG fixations also aid performance in visual search tasks with unfamiliar and abstract stimuli. Moreover, to provide evidence for the multiple-item processing view, we analysed the effects of COG fixations on the number and dwell times of stimulus fixations. The results showed that (1) search efficiency increased with increasing COG fixations even in search for unfamiliar stimuli and in the absence of special higher-order skills, (2) COG fixations reliably reduced the number of stimulus fixations and their dwell times, indicating processing of multiple distractors, and (3) the proportion of COG fixations was dynamically adapted to potential information gain of COG locations. A second experiment showed that COG fixations are diminished when stimulus positions unpredictably vary across trials. Together, the results support the multiple-item processing view, which has important implications for current theories of visual search. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4065739/ /pubmed/25002972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/237812 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dustin Venini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Venini, Dustin Remington, Roger W. Horstmann, Gernot Becker, Stefanie I. Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something |
title | Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something |
title_full | Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something |
title_fullStr | Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something |
title_full_unstemmed | Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something |
title_short | Centre-of-Gravity Fixations in Visual Search: When Looking at Nothing Helps to Find Something |
title_sort | centre-of-gravity fixations in visual search: when looking at nothing helps to find something |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/237812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veninidustin centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething AT remingtonrogerw centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething AT horstmanngernot centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething AT beckerstefaniei centreofgravityfixationsinvisualsearchwhenlookingatnothinghelpstofindsomething |