Cargando…

Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The use of buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) for urethral reconstruction has increased in popularity over the last several decades. Our aim was to describe our institutional experience with and outcomes after BMG urethroplasty. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of boys undergoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Emilie K, Kozinn, Spencer I, Johnson, Kathryn L, Kim, Sohee, Diamond, David A, Retik, Alan B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-46
_version_ 1782322169175343104
author Johnson, Emilie K
Kozinn, Spencer I
Johnson, Kathryn L
Kim, Sohee
Diamond, David A
Retik, Alan B
author_facet Johnson, Emilie K
Kozinn, Spencer I
Johnson, Kathryn L
Kim, Sohee
Diamond, David A
Retik, Alan B
author_sort Johnson, Emilie K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) for urethral reconstruction has increased in popularity over the last several decades. Our aim was to describe our institutional experience with and outcomes after BMG urethroplasty. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of boys undergoing BMG urethral reconstruction. Preoperative and perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (median age 8.2 years) underwent BMG urethroplasty from 1995–2012. Of the 10 patients undergoing 1-stage repairs, 6 had tubularized grafts, the last of which was performed in 2000 due to an unacceptably high revision rate (100%). A 2-stage approach was elected for 19 patients (median follow-up 21.3 months). Complications including stricture, fistula, or chordee were seen in 60% of patients completing both stages and 32% required ≥1 revision. However, 71% of 2-stage patients were free of significant problems at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found BMG to be a reasonable option for use in complex pediatric urethral reconstruction. Tubularized grafts had poor results, and we no longer use them. We favor a 2-stage approach for all patients except those with “simple” non-hypospadiac strictures. Although revision procedures were not uncommon, the majority of patients were ultimately free of long-term problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4066324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40663242014-06-24 Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study Johnson, Emilie K Kozinn, Spencer I Johnson, Kathryn L Kim, Sohee Diamond, David A Retik, Alan B BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) for urethral reconstruction has increased in popularity over the last several decades. Our aim was to describe our institutional experience with and outcomes after BMG urethroplasty. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of boys undergoing BMG urethral reconstruction. Preoperative and perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (median age 8.2 years) underwent BMG urethroplasty from 1995–2012. Of the 10 patients undergoing 1-stage repairs, 6 had tubularized grafts, the last of which was performed in 2000 due to an unacceptably high revision rate (100%). A 2-stage approach was elected for 19 patients (median follow-up 21.3 months). Complications including stricture, fistula, or chordee were seen in 60% of patients completing both stages and 32% required ≥1 revision. However, 71% of 2-stage patients were free of significant problems at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found BMG to be a reasonable option for use in complex pediatric urethral reconstruction. Tubularized grafts had poor results, and we no longer use them. We favor a 2-stage approach for all patients except those with “simple” non-hypospadiac strictures. Although revision procedures were not uncommon, the majority of patients were ultimately free of long-term problems. BioMed Central 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4066324/ /pubmed/24902693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-46 Text en Copyright © 2014 Johnson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Emilie K
Kozinn, Spencer I
Johnson, Kathryn L
Kim, Sohee
Diamond, David A
Retik, Alan B
Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study
title Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-46
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonemiliek useofbuccalmucosagraftsforurethralreconstructioninchildrenaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kozinnspenceri useofbuccalmucosagraftsforurethralreconstructioninchildrenaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT johnsonkathrynl useofbuccalmucosagraftsforurethralreconstructioninchildrenaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kimsohee useofbuccalmucosagraftsforurethralreconstructioninchildrenaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT diamonddavida useofbuccalmucosagraftsforurethralreconstructioninchildrenaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT retikalanb useofbuccalmucosagraftsforurethralreconstructioninchildrenaretrospectivecohortstudy