Cargando…

Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells

CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated DNA cleavage (CCMDC) is becoming increasingly used for efficient genome engineering. Proto-spacer adjacent motif (PAM) adjacent to target sequence is one of the key components in the design of CCMDC strategies. It has been reported that NAG sequences are the predominant non-can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yilan, Ge, Xianglian, Yang, Fayu, Zhang, Liping, Zheng, Jiayong, Tan, Xuefang, Jin, Zi-Bing, Qu, Jia, Gu, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24956376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05405
_version_ 1782322205250551808
author Zhang, Yilan
Ge, Xianglian
Yang, Fayu
Zhang, Liping
Zheng, Jiayong
Tan, Xuefang
Jin, Zi-Bing
Qu, Jia
Gu, Feng
author_facet Zhang, Yilan
Ge, Xianglian
Yang, Fayu
Zhang, Liping
Zheng, Jiayong
Tan, Xuefang
Jin, Zi-Bing
Qu, Jia
Gu, Feng
author_sort Zhang, Yilan
collection PubMed
description CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated DNA cleavage (CCMDC) is becoming increasingly used for efficient genome engineering. Proto-spacer adjacent motif (PAM) adjacent to target sequence is one of the key components in the design of CCMDC strategies. It has been reported that NAG sequences are the predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC at the human EMX locus, but it is not clear whether it is universal at other loci. In the present study, we attempted to use a GFP-reporter system to comprehensively and quantitatively test the efficiency of CCMDC with non-canonical PAMs in human cells. The initial results indicated that the effectiveness of NGA PAM for CCMDC is much higher than that of other 14 PAMs including NAG. Then we further designed another three pairs of NGG, NGA and NAG PAMs at different locations in the GFP gene and investigated the corresponding DNA cleavage efficiency. We observed that one group of NGA PAMs have a relatively higher DNA cleavage efficiency, while the other groups have lower efficiency, compared with the corresponding NAG PAMs. Our study clearly demonstrates that NAG may not be the universally predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC in human cells. These findings raise more concerns over off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4066725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40667252014-06-23 Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells Zhang, Yilan Ge, Xianglian Yang, Fayu Zhang, Liping Zheng, Jiayong Tan, Xuefang Jin, Zi-Bing Qu, Jia Gu, Feng Sci Rep Article CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated DNA cleavage (CCMDC) is becoming increasingly used for efficient genome engineering. Proto-spacer adjacent motif (PAM) adjacent to target sequence is one of the key components in the design of CCMDC strategies. It has been reported that NAG sequences are the predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC at the human EMX locus, but it is not clear whether it is universal at other loci. In the present study, we attempted to use a GFP-reporter system to comprehensively and quantitatively test the efficiency of CCMDC with non-canonical PAMs in human cells. The initial results indicated that the effectiveness of NGA PAM for CCMDC is much higher than that of other 14 PAMs including NAG. Then we further designed another three pairs of NGG, NGA and NAG PAMs at different locations in the GFP gene and investigated the corresponding DNA cleavage efficiency. We observed that one group of NGA PAMs have a relatively higher DNA cleavage efficiency, while the other groups have lower efficiency, compared with the corresponding NAG PAMs. Our study clearly demonstrates that NAG may not be the universally predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC in human cells. These findings raise more concerns over off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Nature Publishing Group 2014-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4066725/ /pubmed/24956376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05405 Text en Copyright © 2014, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Yilan
Ge, Xianglian
Yang, Fayu
Zhang, Liping
Zheng, Jiayong
Tan, Xuefang
Jin, Zi-Bing
Qu, Jia
Gu, Feng
Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells
title Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells
title_full Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells
title_fullStr Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells
title_short Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells
title_sort comparison of non-canonical pams for crispr/cas9-mediated dna cleavage in human cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24956376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05405
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyilan comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT gexianglian comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT yangfayu comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT zhangliping comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT zhengjiayong comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT tanxuefang comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT jinzibing comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT qujia comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells
AT gufeng comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells