Cargando…
Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells
CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated DNA cleavage (CCMDC) is becoming increasingly used for efficient genome engineering. Proto-spacer adjacent motif (PAM) adjacent to target sequence is one of the key components in the design of CCMDC strategies. It has been reported that NAG sequences are the predominant non-can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24956376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05405 |
_version_ | 1782322205250551808 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yilan Ge, Xianglian Yang, Fayu Zhang, Liping Zheng, Jiayong Tan, Xuefang Jin, Zi-Bing Qu, Jia Gu, Feng |
author_facet | Zhang, Yilan Ge, Xianglian Yang, Fayu Zhang, Liping Zheng, Jiayong Tan, Xuefang Jin, Zi-Bing Qu, Jia Gu, Feng |
author_sort | Zhang, Yilan |
collection | PubMed |
description | CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated DNA cleavage (CCMDC) is becoming increasingly used for efficient genome engineering. Proto-spacer adjacent motif (PAM) adjacent to target sequence is one of the key components in the design of CCMDC strategies. It has been reported that NAG sequences are the predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC at the human EMX locus, but it is not clear whether it is universal at other loci. In the present study, we attempted to use a GFP-reporter system to comprehensively and quantitatively test the efficiency of CCMDC with non-canonical PAMs in human cells. The initial results indicated that the effectiveness of NGA PAM for CCMDC is much higher than that of other 14 PAMs including NAG. Then we further designed another three pairs of NGG, NGA and NAG PAMs at different locations in the GFP gene and investigated the corresponding DNA cleavage efficiency. We observed that one group of NGA PAMs have a relatively higher DNA cleavage efficiency, while the other groups have lower efficiency, compared with the corresponding NAG PAMs. Our study clearly demonstrates that NAG may not be the universally predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC in human cells. These findings raise more concerns over off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4066725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40667252014-06-23 Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells Zhang, Yilan Ge, Xianglian Yang, Fayu Zhang, Liping Zheng, Jiayong Tan, Xuefang Jin, Zi-Bing Qu, Jia Gu, Feng Sci Rep Article CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated DNA cleavage (CCMDC) is becoming increasingly used for efficient genome engineering. Proto-spacer adjacent motif (PAM) adjacent to target sequence is one of the key components in the design of CCMDC strategies. It has been reported that NAG sequences are the predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC at the human EMX locus, but it is not clear whether it is universal at other loci. In the present study, we attempted to use a GFP-reporter system to comprehensively and quantitatively test the efficiency of CCMDC with non-canonical PAMs in human cells. The initial results indicated that the effectiveness of NGA PAM for CCMDC is much higher than that of other 14 PAMs including NAG. Then we further designed another three pairs of NGG, NGA and NAG PAMs at different locations in the GFP gene and investigated the corresponding DNA cleavage efficiency. We observed that one group of NGA PAMs have a relatively higher DNA cleavage efficiency, while the other groups have lower efficiency, compared with the corresponding NAG PAMs. Our study clearly demonstrates that NAG may not be the universally predominant non-canonical PAM for CCMDC in human cells. These findings raise more concerns over off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Nature Publishing Group 2014-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4066725/ /pubmed/24956376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05405 Text en Copyright © 2014, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Yilan Ge, Xianglian Yang, Fayu Zhang, Liping Zheng, Jiayong Tan, Xuefang Jin, Zi-Bing Qu, Jia Gu, Feng Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells |
title | Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells |
title_full | Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells |
title_fullStr | Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells |
title_short | Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells |
title_sort | comparison of non-canonical pams for crispr/cas9-mediated dna cleavage in human cells |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24956376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyilan comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT gexianglian comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT yangfayu comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT zhangliping comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT zhengjiayong comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT tanxuefang comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT jinzibing comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT qujia comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells AT gufeng comparisonofnoncanonicalpamsforcrisprcas9mediateddnacleavageinhumancells |