Cargando…

Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance

External beam radiation therapy with conventional fractionation to a total dose of 76–80 Gy represents the most adopted treatment modality for prostate cancer. Dose escalation in this setting has been demonstrated to improve biochemical control with acceptable toxicity using contemporary radiotherap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangoni, M., Desideri, I., Detti, B., Bonomo, P., Greto, D., Paiar, F., Simontacchi, G., Meattini, I., Scoccianti, S., Masoni, T., Ciabatti, C., Turkaj, A., Serni, S., Minervini, A., Gacci, M., Carini, M., Livi, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/781340
_version_ 1782322228703002624
author Mangoni, M.
Desideri, I.
Detti, B.
Bonomo, P.
Greto, D.
Paiar, F.
Simontacchi, G.
Meattini, I.
Scoccianti, S.
Masoni, T.
Ciabatti, C.
Turkaj, A.
Serni, S.
Minervini, A.
Gacci, M.
Carini, M.
Livi, L.
author_facet Mangoni, M.
Desideri, I.
Detti, B.
Bonomo, P.
Greto, D.
Paiar, F.
Simontacchi, G.
Meattini, I.
Scoccianti, S.
Masoni, T.
Ciabatti, C.
Turkaj, A.
Serni, S.
Minervini, A.
Gacci, M.
Carini, M.
Livi, L.
author_sort Mangoni, M.
collection PubMed
description External beam radiation therapy with conventional fractionation to a total dose of 76–80 Gy represents the most adopted treatment modality for prostate cancer. Dose escalation in this setting has been demonstrated to improve biochemical control with acceptable toxicity using contemporary radiotherapy techniques. Hypofractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy have gained an increasing interest in recent years and they have the potential to become the standard of care even if long-term data about their efficacy and safety are not well established. Strong radiobiological basis supports the use of high dose for fraction in prostate cancer, due to the demonstrated exceptionally low values of α/β. Clinical experiences with hypofractionated and stereotactic radiotherapy (with an adequate biologically equivalent dose) demonstrated good tolerance, a PSA control comparable to conventional fractionation, and the advantage of shorter time period of treatment. This paper reviews the radiobiological findings that have led to the increasing use of hypofractionation in the management of prostate cancer and briefly analyzes the clinical experience in this setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4066864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40668642014-07-06 Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance Mangoni, M. Desideri, I. Detti, B. Bonomo, P. Greto, D. Paiar, F. Simontacchi, G. Meattini, I. Scoccianti, S. Masoni, T. Ciabatti, C. Turkaj, A. Serni, S. Minervini, A. Gacci, M. Carini, M. Livi, L. Biomed Res Int Review Article External beam radiation therapy with conventional fractionation to a total dose of 76–80 Gy represents the most adopted treatment modality for prostate cancer. Dose escalation in this setting has been demonstrated to improve biochemical control with acceptable toxicity using contemporary radiotherapy techniques. Hypofractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy have gained an increasing interest in recent years and they have the potential to become the standard of care even if long-term data about their efficacy and safety are not well established. Strong radiobiological basis supports the use of high dose for fraction in prostate cancer, due to the demonstrated exceptionally low values of α/β. Clinical experiences with hypofractionated and stereotactic radiotherapy (with an adequate biologically equivalent dose) demonstrated good tolerance, a PSA control comparable to conventional fractionation, and the advantage of shorter time period of treatment. This paper reviews the radiobiological findings that have led to the increasing use of hypofractionation in the management of prostate cancer and briefly analyzes the clinical experience in this setting. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4066864/ /pubmed/24999475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/781340 Text en Copyright © 2014 M. Mangoni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mangoni, M.
Desideri, I.
Detti, B.
Bonomo, P.
Greto, D.
Paiar, F.
Simontacchi, G.
Meattini, I.
Scoccianti, S.
Masoni, T.
Ciabatti, C.
Turkaj, A.
Serni, S.
Minervini, A.
Gacci, M.
Carini, M.
Livi, L.
Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance
title Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance
title_full Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance
title_fullStr Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance
title_full_unstemmed Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance
title_short Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer: Radiobiological Basis and Clinical Appliance
title_sort hypofractionation in prostate cancer: radiobiological basis and clinical appliance
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/781340
work_keys_str_mv AT mangonim hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT desiderii hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT dettib hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT bonomop hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT gretod hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT paiarf hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT simontacchig hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT meattinii hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT scocciantis hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT masonit hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT ciabattic hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT turkaja hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT sernis hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT minervinia hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT gaccim hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT carinim hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance
AT livil hypofractionationinprostatecancerradiobiologicalbasisandclinicalappliance