Cargando…

Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells

In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash, Vasudev, Venkateshaiah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703136
_version_ 1782322239113265152
author Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash
Vasudev, Venkateshaiah
author_facet Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash
Vasudev, Venkateshaiah
author_sort Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash
collection PubMed
description In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 50 mg/kg body weight of MMS and challenging dose of 240 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 150 mg/kg body weight of MMS were selected by pilot toxicity studies. Conditioned EAC cells when challenged after 8 h time lag resulted in significant reduction in chromosomal aberrations compared to challenging dose of respective agents. As has been proved in earlier studies with normal organisms, even in cancerous cells (EAC), there is presence of adaptive response to methylating and ethylating agents. Furthermore, it is also interesting to note in the present studies that the methylating agent, MMS, is a stronger inducer of the adaptive response than the ethylating agent, EMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4066937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40669372014-07-06 Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash Vasudev, Venkateshaiah Scientifica (Cairo) Research Article In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 50 mg/kg body weight of MMS and challenging dose of 240 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 150 mg/kg body weight of MMS were selected by pilot toxicity studies. Conditioned EAC cells when challenged after 8 h time lag resulted in significant reduction in chromosomal aberrations compared to challenging dose of respective agents. As has been proved in earlier studies with normal organisms, even in cancerous cells (EAC), there is presence of adaptive response to methylating and ethylating agents. Furthermore, it is also interesting to note in the present studies that the methylating agent, MMS, is a stronger inducer of the adaptive response than the ethylating agent, EMS. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4066937/ /pubmed/24999435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703136 Text en Copyright © 2014 P. V. Mahadimane and V. Vasudev. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash
Vasudev, Venkateshaiah
Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells
title Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells
title_full Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells
title_fullStr Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells
title_full_unstemmed Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells
title_short Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells
title_sort inducible protective processes in animal systems xiii: comparative analysis of induction of adaptive response by ems and mms in ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703136
work_keys_str_mv AT mahadimaneperiyapatnavishwaprakash inducibleprotectiveprocessesinanimalsystemsxiiicomparativeanalysisofinductionofadaptiveresponsebyemsandmmsinehrlichascitescarcinomacells
AT vasudevvenkateshaiah inducibleprotectiveprocessesinanimalsystemsxiiicomparativeanalysisofinductionofadaptiveresponsebyemsandmmsinehrlichascitescarcinomacells