Cargando…
Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells
In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703136 |
_version_ | 1782322239113265152 |
---|---|
author | Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash Vasudev, Venkateshaiah |
author_facet | Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash Vasudev, Venkateshaiah |
author_sort | Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 50 mg/kg body weight of MMS and challenging dose of 240 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 150 mg/kg body weight of MMS were selected by pilot toxicity studies. Conditioned EAC cells when challenged after 8 h time lag resulted in significant reduction in chromosomal aberrations compared to challenging dose of respective agents. As has been proved in earlier studies with normal organisms, even in cancerous cells (EAC), there is presence of adaptive response to methylating and ethylating agents. Furthermore, it is also interesting to note in the present studies that the methylating agent, MMS, is a stronger inducer of the adaptive response than the ethylating agent, EMS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4066937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40669372014-07-06 Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash Vasudev, Venkateshaiah Scientifica (Cairo) Research Article In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 50 mg/kg body weight of MMS and challenging dose of 240 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 150 mg/kg body weight of MMS were selected by pilot toxicity studies. Conditioned EAC cells when challenged after 8 h time lag resulted in significant reduction in chromosomal aberrations compared to challenging dose of respective agents. As has been proved in earlier studies with normal organisms, even in cancerous cells (EAC), there is presence of adaptive response to methylating and ethylating agents. Furthermore, it is also interesting to note in the present studies that the methylating agent, MMS, is a stronger inducer of the adaptive response than the ethylating agent, EMS. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4066937/ /pubmed/24999435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703136 Text en Copyright © 2014 P. V. Mahadimane and V. Vasudev. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mahadimane, Periyapatna Vishwaprakash Vasudev, Venkateshaiah Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells |
title | Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells |
title_full | Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells |
title_fullStr | Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells |
title_short | Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells |
title_sort | inducible protective processes in animal systems xiii: comparative analysis of induction of adaptive response by ems and mms in ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4066937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahadimaneperiyapatnavishwaprakash inducibleprotectiveprocessesinanimalsystemsxiiicomparativeanalysisofinductionofadaptiveresponsebyemsandmmsinehrlichascitescarcinomacells AT vasudevvenkateshaiah inducibleprotectiveprocessesinanimalsystemsxiiicomparativeanalysisofinductionofadaptiveresponsebyemsandmmsinehrlichascitescarcinomacells |