Cargando…

Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI

Objects are reminiscent of actions often performed with them: knife and apple remind us on peeling the apple or cutting it. Mnemonic representations of object-related actions (action codes) evoked by the sight of an object may constrain and hence facilitate recognition of unrolling actions. The pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schubotz, Ricarda I., Wurm, Moritz F., Wittmann, Marco K., von Cramon, D. Yves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25009519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00636
_version_ 1782322307971153920
author Schubotz, Ricarda I.
Wurm, Moritz F.
Wittmann, Marco K.
von Cramon, D. Yves
author_facet Schubotz, Ricarda I.
Wurm, Moritz F.
Wittmann, Marco K.
von Cramon, D. Yves
author_sort Schubotz, Ricarda I.
collection PubMed
description Objects are reminiscent of actions often performed with them: knife and apple remind us on peeling the apple or cutting it. Mnemonic representations of object-related actions (action codes) evoked by the sight of an object may constrain and hence facilitate recognition of unrolling actions. The present fMRI study investigated if and how action codes influence brain activation during action observation. The average number of action codes (NAC) of 51 sets of objects was rated by a group of n = 24 participants. In an fMRI study, different volunteers were asked to recognize actions performed with the same objects presented in short videos. To disentangle areas reflecting the storage of action codes from those exploiting them, we showed object-compatible and object-incompatible (pantomime) actions. Areas storing action codes were considered to positively co-vary with NAC in both object-compatible and object-incompatible action; due to its role in tool-related tasks, we here hypothesized left anterior inferior parietal cortex (aIPL). In contrast, areas exploiting action codes were expected to show this correlation only in object-compatible but not incompatible action, as only object-compatible actions match one of the active action codes. For this interaction, we hypothesized ventrolateral premotor cortex (PMv) to join aIPL due to its role in biasing competition in IPL. We found left anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and left posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG) to co-vary with NAC. In addition to these areas, action codes increased activity in object-compatible action in bilateral PMv, right IPS, and lateral occipital cortex (LO). Findings suggest that during action observation, the brain derives possible actions from perceived objects, and uses this information to shape action recognition. In particular, the number of expectable actions quantifies the activity level at PMv, IPL, and pMTG, but only PMv reflects their biased competition while observed action unfolds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4067566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40675662014-07-09 Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI Schubotz, Ricarda I. Wurm, Moritz F. Wittmann, Marco K. von Cramon, D. Yves Front Psychol Psychology Objects are reminiscent of actions often performed with them: knife and apple remind us on peeling the apple or cutting it. Mnemonic representations of object-related actions (action codes) evoked by the sight of an object may constrain and hence facilitate recognition of unrolling actions. The present fMRI study investigated if and how action codes influence brain activation during action observation. The average number of action codes (NAC) of 51 sets of objects was rated by a group of n = 24 participants. In an fMRI study, different volunteers were asked to recognize actions performed with the same objects presented in short videos. To disentangle areas reflecting the storage of action codes from those exploiting them, we showed object-compatible and object-incompatible (pantomime) actions. Areas storing action codes were considered to positively co-vary with NAC in both object-compatible and object-incompatible action; due to its role in tool-related tasks, we here hypothesized left anterior inferior parietal cortex (aIPL). In contrast, areas exploiting action codes were expected to show this correlation only in object-compatible but not incompatible action, as only object-compatible actions match one of the active action codes. For this interaction, we hypothesized ventrolateral premotor cortex (PMv) to join aIPL due to its role in biasing competition in IPL. We found left anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and left posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG) to co-vary with NAC. In addition to these areas, action codes increased activity in object-compatible action in bilateral PMv, right IPS, and lateral occipital cortex (LO). Findings suggest that during action observation, the brain derives possible actions from perceived objects, and uses this information to shape action recognition. In particular, the number of expectable actions quantifies the activity level at PMv, IPL, and pMTG, but only PMv reflects their biased competition while observed action unfolds. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4067566/ /pubmed/25009519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00636 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schubotz, Wurm, Wittmann and von Cramon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Schubotz, Ricarda I.
Wurm, Moritz F.
Wittmann, Marco K.
von Cramon, D. Yves
Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI
title Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI
title_full Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI
title_fullStr Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI
title_full_unstemmed Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI
title_short Objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fMRI
title_sort objects tell us what action we can expect: dissociating brain areas for retrieval and exploitation of action knowledge during action observation in fmri
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25009519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00636
work_keys_str_mv AT schubotzricardai objectstelluswhatactionwecanexpectdissociatingbrainareasforretrievalandexploitationofactionknowledgeduringactionobservationinfmri
AT wurmmoritzf objectstelluswhatactionwecanexpectdissociatingbrainareasforretrievalandexploitationofactionknowledgeduringactionobservationinfmri
AT wittmannmarcok objectstelluswhatactionwecanexpectdissociatingbrainareasforretrievalandexploitationofactionknowledgeduringactionobservationinfmri
AT voncramondyves objectstelluswhatactionwecanexpectdissociatingbrainareasforretrievalandexploitationofactionknowledgeduringactionobservationinfmri