Cargando…

Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)()

BACKGROUND: Internet-based Smoking Cessation Interventions could help pregnant women quit smoking, especially those who do not wish to, or cannot, access face-to-face or telephone support. This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate the effectiveness and usage of a fully automated smoking cessation w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herbec, Aleksandra, Brown, Jamie, Tombor, Ildiko, Michie, Susan, West, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24811202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.010
_version_ 1782322329196429312
author Herbec, Aleksandra
Brown, Jamie
Tombor, Ildiko
Michie, Susan
West, Robert
author_facet Herbec, Aleksandra
Brown, Jamie
Tombor, Ildiko
Michie, Susan
West, Robert
author_sort Herbec, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internet-based Smoking Cessation Interventions could help pregnant women quit smoking, especially those who do not wish to, or cannot, access face-to-face or telephone support. This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate the effectiveness and usage of a fully automated smoking cessation website targeted to pregnancy, ‘MumsQuit’, and obtain an initial effect-size estimate for a full scale trial. METHODS: We recruited 200 UK-based pregnant adult smokers online to a two-arm double-blind pilot RCT assessing the effectiveness of MumsQuit compared with an information-only website. MumsQuit was adapted from a generic internet smoking cessation intervention, ‘StopAdvisor’. The primary outcome was self-reported continuous 4-week abstinence assessed at 8 weeks post-baseline. Secondary outcomes were automatically collected data on intervention usage. RESULTS: Participants smoked 15 cigarettes per day on average, 73% were in the first trimester of their pregnancy, 48% were from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, and 43% had never used evidence-based cessation support. The point estimate of odds ratio for the primary outcome was 1.5 (95% CI = 0.8–2.9; 28% vs. 21%). Compared with control participants, those in the MumsQuit group logged in more often (3.5 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001), viewed more pages (67.4 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001) and spent more time browsing the website (21.3 min vs. 1.0 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MumsQuit is an engaging and potentially helpful form of support for pregnant women who seek cessation support online, and merits further development and evaluation in a full-scale RCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4067748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40677482014-07-01 Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)() Herbec, Aleksandra Brown, Jamie Tombor, Ildiko Michie, Susan West, Robert Drug Alcohol Depend Article BACKGROUND: Internet-based Smoking Cessation Interventions could help pregnant women quit smoking, especially those who do not wish to, or cannot, access face-to-face or telephone support. This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate the effectiveness and usage of a fully automated smoking cessation website targeted to pregnancy, ‘MumsQuit’, and obtain an initial effect-size estimate for a full scale trial. METHODS: We recruited 200 UK-based pregnant adult smokers online to a two-arm double-blind pilot RCT assessing the effectiveness of MumsQuit compared with an information-only website. MumsQuit was adapted from a generic internet smoking cessation intervention, ‘StopAdvisor’. The primary outcome was self-reported continuous 4-week abstinence assessed at 8 weeks post-baseline. Secondary outcomes were automatically collected data on intervention usage. RESULTS: Participants smoked 15 cigarettes per day on average, 73% were in the first trimester of their pregnancy, 48% were from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, and 43% had never used evidence-based cessation support. The point estimate of odds ratio for the primary outcome was 1.5 (95% CI = 0.8–2.9; 28% vs. 21%). Compared with control participants, those in the MumsQuit group logged in more often (3.5 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001), viewed more pages (67.4 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001) and spent more time browsing the website (21.3 min vs. 1.0 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MumsQuit is an engaging and potentially helpful form of support for pregnant women who seek cessation support online, and merits further development and evaluation in a full-scale RCT. Elsevier 2014-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4067748/ /pubmed/24811202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.010 Text en © 2014 Aleksandra Herbec http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Herbec, Aleksandra
Brown, Jamie
Tombor, Ildiko
Michie, Susan
West, Robert
Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)()
title Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)()
title_full Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)()
title_fullStr Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)()
title_full_unstemmed Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)()
title_short Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘MumsQuit’)()
title_sort pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (‘mumsquit’)()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24811202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.010
work_keys_str_mv AT herbecaleksandra pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialofaninternetbasedsmokingcessationinterventionforpregnantsmokersmumsquit
AT brownjamie pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialofaninternetbasedsmokingcessationinterventionforpregnantsmokersmumsquit
AT tomborildiko pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialofaninternetbasedsmokingcessationinterventionforpregnantsmokersmumsquit
AT michiesusan pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialofaninternetbasedsmokingcessationinterventionforpregnantsmokersmumsquit
AT westrobert pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialofaninternetbasedsmokingcessationinterventionforpregnantsmokersmumsquit