Cargando…

Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol

INTRODUCTION: Getting the results of research implemented into routine healthcare is often a challenge. The disconnect between the development and implementation of evidence into practice is called the ‘second translational gap’ and is particularly apparent in primary care. To address this gap, we p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lau, Rosa, Stevenson, Fiona, Ong, Bie Nio, Dziedzic, Krysia, Eldridge, Sandra, Everitt, Hazel, Kennedy, Anne, Kontopantelis, Evangelos, Little, Paul, Qureshi, Nadeem, Rogers, Anne, Treweek, Shaun, Peacock, Richard, Murray, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548
_version_ 1782322341908316160
author Lau, Rosa
Stevenson, Fiona
Ong, Bie Nio
Dziedzic, Krysia
Eldridge, Sandra
Everitt, Hazel
Kennedy, Anne
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Little, Paul
Qureshi, Nadeem
Rogers, Anne
Treweek, Shaun
Peacock, Richard
Murray, Elizabeth
author_facet Lau, Rosa
Stevenson, Fiona
Ong, Bie Nio
Dziedzic, Krysia
Eldridge, Sandra
Everitt, Hazel
Kennedy, Anne
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Little, Paul
Qureshi, Nadeem
Rogers, Anne
Treweek, Shaun
Peacock, Richard
Murray, Elizabeth
author_sort Lau, Rosa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Getting the results of research implemented into routine healthcare is often a challenge. The disconnect between the development and implementation of evidence into practice is called the ‘second translational gap’ and is particularly apparent in primary care. To address this gap, we plan to identify, summarise and synthesise currently available evidence by undertaking a systematic review of reviews to: (1) explore barriers and facilitators of implementation of research evidence or complex interventions, and (2) assess the effectiveness of strategies in facilitating implementation of complex interventions in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a systematic review of reviews. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO up until December 2013. We will check reference lists of included studies for further studies. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search; any discrepancies will be resolved by discussion and consensus. Full-text papers will be obtained and relevant reviews will be selected against inclusion criteria. Eligible reviews have to be based on predominantly primary care in developed countries and examine either factors to implementation or, the effectiveness of strategies to optimise implementation. Data from eligible reviews will be extracted using standardised data abstraction forms. For barriers and facilitators, data will be synthesised using an interpretative meta-synthesis approach. For implementation strategies, findings will be summarised and described narratively and synthesised using a framework approach. All findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The review findings will inform the work of the design and implementation of future studies and will be of interest to a wide audience including health professionals, researchers, health service or commissioning managers and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Protocol registration number (PROSPERO CRD42014009410).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4067819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40678192014-06-25 Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol Lau, Rosa Stevenson, Fiona Ong, Bie Nio Dziedzic, Krysia Eldridge, Sandra Everitt, Hazel Kennedy, Anne Kontopantelis, Evangelos Little, Paul Qureshi, Nadeem Rogers, Anne Treweek, Shaun Peacock, Richard Murray, Elizabeth BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: Getting the results of research implemented into routine healthcare is often a challenge. The disconnect between the development and implementation of evidence into practice is called the ‘second translational gap’ and is particularly apparent in primary care. To address this gap, we plan to identify, summarise and synthesise currently available evidence by undertaking a systematic review of reviews to: (1) explore barriers and facilitators of implementation of research evidence or complex interventions, and (2) assess the effectiveness of strategies in facilitating implementation of complex interventions in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a systematic review of reviews. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO up until December 2013. We will check reference lists of included studies for further studies. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search; any discrepancies will be resolved by discussion and consensus. Full-text papers will be obtained and relevant reviews will be selected against inclusion criteria. Eligible reviews have to be based on predominantly primary care in developed countries and examine either factors to implementation or, the effectiveness of strategies to optimise implementation. Data from eligible reviews will be extracted using standardised data abstraction forms. For barriers and facilitators, data will be synthesised using an interpretative meta-synthesis approach. For implementation strategies, findings will be summarised and described narratively and synthesised using a framework approach. All findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The review findings will inform the work of the design and implementation of future studies and will be of interest to a wide audience including health professionals, researchers, health service or commissioning managers and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Protocol registration number (PROSPERO CRD42014009410). BMJ Publishing Group 2014-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4067819/ /pubmed/24958212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Lau, Rosa
Stevenson, Fiona
Ong, Bie Nio
Dziedzic, Krysia
Eldridge, Sandra
Everitt, Hazel
Kennedy, Anne
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Little, Paul
Qureshi, Nadeem
Rogers, Anne
Treweek, Shaun
Peacock, Richard
Murray, Elizabeth
Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
title Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
title_full Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
title_fullStr Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
title_full_unstemmed Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
title_short Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
title_sort addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548
work_keys_str_mv AT laurosa addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT stevensonfiona addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT ongbienio addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT dziedzickrysia addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT eldridgesandra addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT everitthazel addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT kennedyanne addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT kontopantelisevangelos addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT littlepaul addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT qureshinadeem addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT rogersanne addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT treweekshaun addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT peacockrichard addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol
AT murrayelizabeth addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol