Cargando…
Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol
INTRODUCTION: Getting the results of research implemented into routine healthcare is often a challenge. The disconnect between the development and implementation of evidence into practice is called the ‘second translational gap’ and is particularly apparent in primary care. To address this gap, we p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548 |
_version_ | 1782322341908316160 |
---|---|
author | Lau, Rosa Stevenson, Fiona Ong, Bie Nio Dziedzic, Krysia Eldridge, Sandra Everitt, Hazel Kennedy, Anne Kontopantelis, Evangelos Little, Paul Qureshi, Nadeem Rogers, Anne Treweek, Shaun Peacock, Richard Murray, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Lau, Rosa Stevenson, Fiona Ong, Bie Nio Dziedzic, Krysia Eldridge, Sandra Everitt, Hazel Kennedy, Anne Kontopantelis, Evangelos Little, Paul Qureshi, Nadeem Rogers, Anne Treweek, Shaun Peacock, Richard Murray, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Lau, Rosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Getting the results of research implemented into routine healthcare is often a challenge. The disconnect between the development and implementation of evidence into practice is called the ‘second translational gap’ and is particularly apparent in primary care. To address this gap, we plan to identify, summarise and synthesise currently available evidence by undertaking a systematic review of reviews to: (1) explore barriers and facilitators of implementation of research evidence or complex interventions, and (2) assess the effectiveness of strategies in facilitating implementation of complex interventions in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a systematic review of reviews. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO up until December 2013. We will check reference lists of included studies for further studies. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search; any discrepancies will be resolved by discussion and consensus. Full-text papers will be obtained and relevant reviews will be selected against inclusion criteria. Eligible reviews have to be based on predominantly primary care in developed countries and examine either factors to implementation or, the effectiveness of strategies to optimise implementation. Data from eligible reviews will be extracted using standardised data abstraction forms. For barriers and facilitators, data will be synthesised using an interpretative meta-synthesis approach. For implementation strategies, findings will be summarised and described narratively and synthesised using a framework approach. All findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The review findings will inform the work of the design and implementation of future studies and will be of interest to a wide audience including health professionals, researchers, health service or commissioning managers and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Protocol registration number (PROSPERO CRD42014009410). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4067819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40678192014-06-25 Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol Lau, Rosa Stevenson, Fiona Ong, Bie Nio Dziedzic, Krysia Eldridge, Sandra Everitt, Hazel Kennedy, Anne Kontopantelis, Evangelos Little, Paul Qureshi, Nadeem Rogers, Anne Treweek, Shaun Peacock, Richard Murray, Elizabeth BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: Getting the results of research implemented into routine healthcare is often a challenge. The disconnect between the development and implementation of evidence into practice is called the ‘second translational gap’ and is particularly apparent in primary care. To address this gap, we plan to identify, summarise and synthesise currently available evidence by undertaking a systematic review of reviews to: (1) explore barriers and facilitators of implementation of research evidence or complex interventions, and (2) assess the effectiveness of strategies in facilitating implementation of complex interventions in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a systematic review of reviews. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO up until December 2013. We will check reference lists of included studies for further studies. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search; any discrepancies will be resolved by discussion and consensus. Full-text papers will be obtained and relevant reviews will be selected against inclusion criteria. Eligible reviews have to be based on predominantly primary care in developed countries and examine either factors to implementation or, the effectiveness of strategies to optimise implementation. Data from eligible reviews will be extracted using standardised data abstraction forms. For barriers and facilitators, data will be synthesised using an interpretative meta-synthesis approach. For implementation strategies, findings will be summarised and described narratively and synthesised using a framework approach. All findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The review findings will inform the work of the design and implementation of future studies and will be of interest to a wide audience including health professionals, researchers, health service or commissioning managers and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Protocol registration number (PROSPERO CRD42014009410). BMJ Publishing Group 2014-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4067819/ /pubmed/24958212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Lau, Rosa Stevenson, Fiona Ong, Bie Nio Dziedzic, Krysia Eldridge, Sandra Everitt, Hazel Kennedy, Anne Kontopantelis, Evangelos Little, Paul Qureshi, Nadeem Rogers, Anne Treweek, Shaun Peacock, Richard Murray, Elizabeth Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol |
title | Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol |
title_full | Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol |
title_fullStr | Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol |
title_short | Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol |
title_sort | addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurosa addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT stevensonfiona addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT ongbienio addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT dziedzickrysia addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT eldridgesandra addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT everitthazel addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT kennedyanne addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT kontopantelisevangelos addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT littlepaul addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT qureshinadeem addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT rogersanne addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT treweekshaun addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT peacockrichard addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol AT murrayelizabeth addressingtheevidencetopracticegapforcomplexinterventionsinprimarycareasystematicreviewofreviewsprotocol |