Cargando…

Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010

INTRODUCTION: The true prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is unknown. The objective of this study was 1) to provide the most current GDM prevalence reported on the birth certificate and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) questionnaire and 2) to compare GDM prevale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeSisto, Carla L., Kim, Shin Y., Sharma, Andrea J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945238
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130415
_version_ 1782322386574508032
author DeSisto, Carla L.
Kim, Shin Y.
Sharma, Andrea J.
author_facet DeSisto, Carla L.
Kim, Shin Y.
Sharma, Andrea J.
author_sort DeSisto, Carla L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The true prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is unknown. The objective of this study was 1) to provide the most current GDM prevalence reported on the birth certificate and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) questionnaire and 2) to compare GDM prevalence from PRAMS across 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. METHODS: We examined 2010 GDM prevalence reported on birth certificate or PRAMS questionnaire and concordance between the sources. We included 16 states that adopted the 2003 revised birth certificate. We also examined trends from 2007 through 2010 and included 21 states that participated in PRAMS for all 4 years. We combined GDM prevalence across 2-year intervals and conducted t tests to examine differences. Data were weighted to represent all women delivering live births in each state. RESULTS: GDM prevalence in 2010 was 4.6% as reported on the birth certificate, 8.7% as reported on the PRAMS questionnaire, and 9.2% as reported on either the birth certificate or questionnaire. The agreement between sources was 94.1% (percent positive agreement = 3.7%, percent negative agreement = 90.4%). There was no significant difference in GDM prevalence between 2007–2008 (8.1%) and 2009–2010 (8.5%, P = .15). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that GDM prevalence is as high as 9.2% and is more likely to be reported on the PRAMS questionnaire than the birth certificate. We found no statistical difference in GDM prevalence between the 2 phases. Further studies are needed to understand discrepancies in reporting GDM by data source.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4068111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40681112014-07-18 Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010 DeSisto, Carla L. Kim, Shin Y. Sharma, Andrea J. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: The true prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is unknown. The objective of this study was 1) to provide the most current GDM prevalence reported on the birth certificate and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) questionnaire and 2) to compare GDM prevalence from PRAMS across 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. METHODS: We examined 2010 GDM prevalence reported on birth certificate or PRAMS questionnaire and concordance between the sources. We included 16 states that adopted the 2003 revised birth certificate. We also examined trends from 2007 through 2010 and included 21 states that participated in PRAMS for all 4 years. We combined GDM prevalence across 2-year intervals and conducted t tests to examine differences. Data were weighted to represent all women delivering live births in each state. RESULTS: GDM prevalence in 2010 was 4.6% as reported on the birth certificate, 8.7% as reported on the PRAMS questionnaire, and 9.2% as reported on either the birth certificate or questionnaire. The agreement between sources was 94.1% (percent positive agreement = 3.7%, percent negative agreement = 90.4%). There was no significant difference in GDM prevalence between 2007–2008 (8.1%) and 2009–2010 (8.5%, P = .15). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that GDM prevalence is as high as 9.2% and is more likely to be reported on the PRAMS questionnaire than the birth certificate. We found no statistical difference in GDM prevalence between the 2 phases. Further studies are needed to understand discrepancies in reporting GDM by data source. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4068111/ /pubmed/24945238 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130415 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
DeSisto, Carla L.
Kim, Shin Y.
Sharma, Andrea J.
Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010
title Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010
title_full Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010
title_fullStr Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010
title_short Prevalence Estimates of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010
title_sort prevalence estimates of gestational diabetes mellitus in the united states, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (prams), 2007–2010
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945238
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130415
work_keys_str_mv AT desistocarlal prevalenceestimatesofgestationaldiabetesmellitusintheunitedstatespregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystemprams20072010
AT kimshiny prevalenceestimatesofgestationaldiabetesmellitusintheunitedstatespregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystemprams20072010
AT sharmaandreaj prevalenceestimatesofgestationaldiabetesmellitusintheunitedstatespregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystemprams20072010