Cargando…
Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured?
INTRODUCTION: The rapid growth in chronic disease prevalence, in particular the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions, poses a significant and increasing burden on the health of Americans. Maximizing the use of proven self-management (SM) strategies is a core goal of the US Department of Health...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945239 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130328 |
_version_ | 1782322386796806144 |
---|---|
author | Ruiz, Sarah Brady, Teresa J. Glasgow, Russell E. Birkel, Richard Spafford, Michelle |
author_facet | Ruiz, Sarah Brady, Teresa J. Glasgow, Russell E. Birkel, Richard Spafford, Michelle |
author_sort | Ruiz, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The rapid growth in chronic disease prevalence, in particular the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions, poses a significant and increasing burden on the health of Americans. Maximizing the use of proven self-management (SM) strategies is a core goal of the US Department of Health and Human Services. Yet, there is no systematic way to assess how much SM or self-management support (SMS) is occurring in the United States. The purpose of this project was to identify appropriate concepts or measures to incorporate into national SM and SMS surveillance. METHODS: A multistep process was used to identify candidate concepts, assess existing measures, and select high-priority concepts for further development. A stakeholder survey, an environmental scan, subject matter expert feedback, and a stakeholder priority-setting exercise were all used to select the high-priority concepts for development. RESULTS: The stakeholder survey gathered feedback on 32 candidate concepts; 9 concepts were endorsed by more than 66% of respondents. The environmental scan indicated few existing measures that adequately reflected the candidate concepts, and those that were identified were generally specific to a defined condition and not gathered on a population basis. On the basis of the priority setting exercises and environmental scan, we selected 1 concept from each of 5 levels of behavioral influence for immediate development as an SM or SMS indicator. CONCLUSION: The absence of any available measures to assess SM or SMS across the population highlights the need to develop chronic condition SM surveillance that uses national surveys and other data sources to measure national progress in SM and SMS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4068112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40681122014-07-18 Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured? Ruiz, Sarah Brady, Teresa J. Glasgow, Russell E. Birkel, Richard Spafford, Michelle Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: The rapid growth in chronic disease prevalence, in particular the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions, poses a significant and increasing burden on the health of Americans. Maximizing the use of proven self-management (SM) strategies is a core goal of the US Department of Health and Human Services. Yet, there is no systematic way to assess how much SM or self-management support (SMS) is occurring in the United States. The purpose of this project was to identify appropriate concepts or measures to incorporate into national SM and SMS surveillance. METHODS: A multistep process was used to identify candidate concepts, assess existing measures, and select high-priority concepts for further development. A stakeholder survey, an environmental scan, subject matter expert feedback, and a stakeholder priority-setting exercise were all used to select the high-priority concepts for development. RESULTS: The stakeholder survey gathered feedback on 32 candidate concepts; 9 concepts were endorsed by more than 66% of respondents. The environmental scan indicated few existing measures that adequately reflected the candidate concepts, and those that were identified were generally specific to a defined condition and not gathered on a population basis. On the basis of the priority setting exercises and environmental scan, we selected 1 concept from each of 5 levels of behavioral influence for immediate development as an SM or SMS indicator. CONCLUSION: The absence of any available measures to assess SM or SMS across the population highlights the need to develop chronic condition SM surveillance that uses national surveys and other data sources to measure national progress in SM and SMS. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4068112/ /pubmed/24945239 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130328 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ruiz, Sarah Brady, Teresa J. Glasgow, Russell E. Birkel, Richard Spafford, Michelle Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured? |
title | Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured? |
title_full | Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured? |
title_fullStr | Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured? |
title_full_unstemmed | Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured? |
title_short | Chronic Condition Self-Management Surveillance: What Is and What Should Be Measured? |
title_sort | chronic condition self-management surveillance: what is and what should be measured? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945239 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruizsarah chronicconditionselfmanagementsurveillancewhatisandwhatshouldbemeasured AT bradyteresaj chronicconditionselfmanagementsurveillancewhatisandwhatshouldbemeasured AT glasgowrusselle chronicconditionselfmanagementsurveillancewhatisandwhatshouldbemeasured AT birkelrichard chronicconditionselfmanagementsurveillancewhatisandwhatshouldbemeasured AT spaffordmichelle chronicconditionselfmanagementsurveillancewhatisandwhatshouldbemeasured |