Cargando…
Bivalirudin or heparin: which anticoagulation strategy for critically ill cardiac surgery patients?
Autores principales: | Pappalardo, F, Arnaez, B, Celinska-Spodar, M, Pieri, M, Isella, F, Silvetti, S, Montisci, A, Saleh, O, Koster, A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068326/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13287 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Primary bivalirudin anticoagulation for patients with an implantable ventricular assist device
por: Pieri, M, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Periprocedural anticoagulation in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Heparin vs bivalirudin
por: Minhas, Abdul Mannan Khan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Bivalirudin-based versus conventional heparin anticoagulation for postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
por: Ranucci, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Heparin-based versus bivalirudin-based anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review
por: Valdes, Carlos A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Is it time to switch to bivalirudin for ECMO anticoagulation?
por: Navaei, Amir, et al.
Publicado: (2023)