Cargando…
Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic treatment using the Invisalign® system. Particularly, we analyzed the influence of auxiliaries (Attachment/Power Ridge) as well as the staging (movement per aligner) on treatment efficacy. METHODS: We reviewed the tooth...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24923279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-68 |
_version_ | 1782322483405258752 |
---|---|
author | Simon, Mareike Keilig, Ludger Schwarze, Jörg Jung, Britta A Bourauel, Christoph |
author_facet | Simon, Mareike Keilig, Ludger Schwarze, Jörg Jung, Britta A Bourauel, Christoph |
author_sort | Simon, Mareike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic treatment using the Invisalign® system. Particularly, we analyzed the influence of auxiliaries (Attachment/Power Ridge) as well as the staging (movement per aligner) on treatment efficacy. METHODS: We reviewed the tooth movements of 30 consecutive patients who required orthodontic treatment with Invisalign®. In all patients, one of the following tooth movements was performed: (1) Incisor Torque >10°, (2) Premolar derotation >10° (3) Molar distalization >1.5 mm. The groups (1)-(3) were subdivided: in the first subgroup (a) the movements were supported with the use of an attachment, while in the subgroup (b) no auxiliaries were used (except incisor torque, in which Power Ridges were used). All tooth movements were performed in a split-mouth design. To analyze the clinical efficacy, pre-treatment and final plaster cast models were laser-scanned and the achieved tooth movement was determined by way of a surface/surface matching algorithm. The results were compared with the amount of tooth movement predicted by ClinCheck®. RESULTS: The overall mean efficacy was 59% (SD = 0.2). The mean accuracy for upper incisor torque was 42% (SD = 0.2). Premolar derotation showed the lowest accuracy with approximately 40% (SD = 0.3). Distalization of an upper molar was the most effective movement, with efficacy approximately 87% (SD = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization can be performed using Invisalign® aligners. The staging (movement/aligner) and the total amount of planned movement have an significant impact on treatment efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4068978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40689782014-06-25 Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization Simon, Mareike Keilig, Ludger Schwarze, Jörg Jung, Britta A Bourauel, Christoph BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic treatment using the Invisalign® system. Particularly, we analyzed the influence of auxiliaries (Attachment/Power Ridge) as well as the staging (movement per aligner) on treatment efficacy. METHODS: We reviewed the tooth movements of 30 consecutive patients who required orthodontic treatment with Invisalign®. In all patients, one of the following tooth movements was performed: (1) Incisor Torque >10°, (2) Premolar derotation >10° (3) Molar distalization >1.5 mm. The groups (1)-(3) were subdivided: in the first subgroup (a) the movements were supported with the use of an attachment, while in the subgroup (b) no auxiliaries were used (except incisor torque, in which Power Ridges were used). All tooth movements were performed in a split-mouth design. To analyze the clinical efficacy, pre-treatment and final plaster cast models were laser-scanned and the achieved tooth movement was determined by way of a surface/surface matching algorithm. The results were compared with the amount of tooth movement predicted by ClinCheck®. RESULTS: The overall mean efficacy was 59% (SD = 0.2). The mean accuracy for upper incisor torque was 42% (SD = 0.2). Premolar derotation showed the lowest accuracy with approximately 40% (SD = 0.3). Distalization of an upper molar was the most effective movement, with efficacy approximately 87% (SD = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization can be performed using Invisalign® aligners. The staging (movement/aligner) and the total amount of planned movement have an significant impact on treatment efficacy. BioMed Central 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4068978/ /pubmed/24923279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-68 Text en Copyright © 2014 Simon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Simon, Mareike Keilig, Ludger Schwarze, Jörg Jung, Britta A Bourauel, Christoph Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization |
title | Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization |
title_full | Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization |
title_fullStr | Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization |
title_short | Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization |
title_sort | treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4068978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24923279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonmareike treatmentoutcomeandefficacyofanalignertechniqueregardingincisortorquepremolarderotationandmolardistalization AT keiligludger treatmentoutcomeandefficacyofanalignertechniqueregardingincisortorquepremolarderotationandmolardistalization AT schwarzejorg treatmentoutcomeandefficacyofanalignertechniqueregardingincisortorquepremolarderotationandmolardistalization AT jungbrittaa treatmentoutcomeandefficacyofanalignertechniqueregardingincisortorquepremolarderotationandmolardistalization AT bourauelchristoph treatmentoutcomeandefficacyofanalignertechniqueregardingincisortorquepremolarderotationandmolardistalization |