Cargando…

Variability of CSF Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers: Implications for Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are increasingly being used for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the influence of CSF intralaboratory and interlaboratory variability on diagnostic CSF-based AD classification of subjects and identified causes of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vos, Stephanie J. B., Visser, Pieter Jelle, Verhey, Frans, Aalten, Pauline, Knol, Dirk, Ramakers, Inez, Scheltens, Philip, Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Olde., Verbeek, Marcel M., Teunissen, Charlotte E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24959687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100784
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are increasingly being used for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the influence of CSF intralaboratory and interlaboratory variability on diagnostic CSF-based AD classification of subjects and identified causes of this variation. METHODS: We measured CSF amyloid-β (Aβ) 1-42, total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) by INNOTEST enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in a memory clinic population (n = 126). Samples were measured twice in a single or two laboratories that served as reference labs for CSF analyses in the Netherlands. Predefined cut-offs were used to classify CSF biomarkers as normal or abnormal/AD pattern. RESULTS: CSF intralaboratory variability was higher for Aβ1-42 than for t-tau and p-tau. Reanalysis led to a change in biomarker classification (normal vs. abnormal) of 26% of the subjects based on Aβ1-42, 10% based on t-tau, and 29% based on p-tau. The changes in absolute biomarker concentrations were paralleled by a similar change in levels of internal control samples between different assay lots. CSF interlaboratory variability was higher for p-tau than for Aβ1-42 and t-tau, and reanalysis led to a change in biomarker classification of 12% of the subjects based on Aβ1-42, 1% based on t-tau, and 22% based on p-tau. CONCLUSIONS: Intralaboratory and interlaboratory CSF variability frequently led to change in diagnostic CSF-based AD classification for Aβ1-42 and p-tau. Lot-to-lot variation was a major cause of intralaboratory variability. This will have implications for the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice.