Cargando…

Correction: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:	Correction
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069191/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101068

Ejemplares similares

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Long, Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Lee, Seung Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Makowski, Marcin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Urinary retention between nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
por: Zhou, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial
por: Roh, Ju-Won, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
por: Ditto, Antonino, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the precision surgery for cervical cancer
por: Sakuragi, Noriaki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: Kobayashi's Method
por: Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki
Publicado: (2021)

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: time for a new standard of care for cervical cancer?
por: Sakuragi, Noriaki
Publicado: (2015)

Laparoscopic nerve‑sparing radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Ma, Linlin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy Using the Okabayashi–Kobayashi Method
por: Sakuragi, Noriaki, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Nerve-Sparing Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for the Beginner in Robotic Surgery
por: Hiramatsu, Yuji
Publicado: (2021)

Nerve-sparing versus non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: surgical and long-term oncological outcomes
por: Gil-Moreno, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Urodynamic study of bladder function following nerve sparing radical hysterectomy
por: Maneschi, Francesco
Publicado: (2014)

Identification and injury to the inferior hypogastric plexus in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
por: Li, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predicting factors for resumption of spontaneous voiding following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
por: Nantasupha, Chalaithorn, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy for Severe Endometriosis and Complex Pelvic Pathology
por: Nezhat, Camran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: Short-Term Oncologic, Surgical, and Functional Outcomes
por: Muallem, Mustafa Zelal, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Total Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy Using the No-look No-touch Technique
por: Fusegi, Atsushi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Applied anatomy of female pelvic plexus for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy(NSRH)
por: Ye, Fan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
por: Luo, Cheng, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies and their effects on bladder function
por: Kanao, Hiroyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Urodynamic outcomes after pelvic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy
por: Tsunetoh, Satoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

An improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique for cervical cancer using the paravesico-vaginal space as a new surgical landmark
por: Zhang, Yuqin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
por: Zeng, Zhen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
por: Hao, Min, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Limited energy parametrial resection/dissection during modified laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
por: Zhao, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Jin, Yue-Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer
por: Ceccaroni, Marcello, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
por: Kim, Hee Seung, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Anatomical location of the surgically identifiable bladder branch of the inferior hypogastric plexus for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
por: Sekiyama, Kentaro, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Advantages of nerve-sparing intrastromal total abdominal hysterectomy
por: Samimi, Daryoosh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The Diagnosis of Perineural Invasion: A Crucial Factor in Novel Algorithm of Coexistence of Conventional and Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy
por: Skręt, Andrzej, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Surgical and functional impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for parametrial deep endometriosis: a single centre experience
por: Rosati, A, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Can laparoscopic nerve-sparing ultra-radical hysterectomy play a role in locally advanced cervical cancer? A single-center retrospective study
por: Wei, Wei-wei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
por: Marchand, Greg, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correction to: Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Zhao, Xiuyuan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China
por: Li, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
por: Zhang, Nina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correction to: Quality of life after laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy
por: Kotani, Yasushi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_reunhfrcumancldalo1hmiskpo