Cargando…
Does average volume-assured pressure support make any difference compared with BIPAP?
Autores principales: | Canpolat, G, Ozgultekin, A, Turan, G, Iskender, A, Adiyeke, E, Ekinci, O |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069417/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13455 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Non-invasive mechanical ventilation after the successful weaning: a comparision with the venturi mask
por: Esra, Adıyeke, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation with Average Volume-Assured Pressure Support versus BiPAP S/T in De Novo Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
por: Briones-Claudett, Killen H., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Pediatric Average Volume Assured Pressure Support
por: Saddi, Vishal, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Nasal mask average volume‐assured pressure support in an infant with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome
por: Saddi, Vishal, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Pulmonary hypertension and chronic hypoventilation in ROHHAD syndrome treated with average‐volume assured pressure support
por: Stowe, Robert C., et al.
Publicado: (2019)