Cargando…

Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With the ethical concern about the dose of CT scan and wide use of CT in protocol of suspected renal colic, more attention has been paid to low dose CT. The aim of the present study was to make a comparison of unenhanced low-dose spiral CT localization with unenhanced st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Licheng, Jiang, Yidong, Fan, Ping, Wang, Keqiang, Yan, Xueting, Wang, Yingchen, Zhang, Lei, Gao, Jiyang, Ding, Zhonghua, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24820832
_version_ 1782322604205408256
author Licheng, Jiang
Yidong, Fan
Ping, Wang
Keqiang, Yan
Xueting, Wang
Yingchen, Zhang
Lei, Gao
Jiyang, Ding
Zhonghua, Xu
author_facet Licheng, Jiang
Yidong, Fan
Ping, Wang
Keqiang, Yan
Xueting, Wang
Yingchen, Zhang
Lei, Gao
Jiyang, Ding
Zhonghua, Xu
author_sort Licheng, Jiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With the ethical concern about the dose of CT scan and wide use of CT in protocol of suspected renal colic, more attention has been paid to low dose CT. The aim of the present study was to make a comparison of unenhanced low-dose spiral CT localization with unenhanced standard-dose spiral CT in patients with upper urinary tract calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) treatment. METHODS: Twenty eight patients with ureter and renal calculus, preparing to take MPCNL, underwent both abdominal low-dose CT (25 mAs) and standard-dose CT (100 mAs). Low-dose CT and standard-dose CT were independently evaluated for the characterization of renal/ureteral calculi, perirenal adjacent organs, blood vessels, indirect signs of renal or ureteral calculus (renal enlargement, pyeloureteral dilatation), and the indices of localization (percutaneous puncture angulation and depth) used in the MPCNL procedure. RESULTS: In all 28 patients, low-dose CT was 100 per cent coincidence 100 per cent sensitive and 100 per cent specific for depicting the location of the renal and ureteral calculus, renal enlargement, pyeloureteral dilatation, adjacent organs, and the presumptive puncture point and a 96.3 per cent coincidence 96 per cent sensitivity and 93 per cent specificity for blood vessel signs within the renal sinus, and with an obvious lower radiation exposure for patients when compared to standard-dose CT (P<0.05). The indices of puncture depth, puncture angulation, and maximum calculus transverse diameter on the axial surface showed no significant difference between the two doses of CT scans, with a significant variation in calculus visualization slice numbers (P<0.05). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that unenhanced low-dose CT achieves a sensitivity and accuracy similar to that of standard-dose CT in assessing the localization of renal ureteral calculus and adjacent organs conditions and identifying the maximum calculus transverse diameter on the axial surface, percutaneous puncture depth, and angulation in patients, with a significant lower radiation exposure, who are to be treated by MPCNL, and can be used as an alternative localization method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4069732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40697322014-07-01 Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) Licheng, Jiang Yidong, Fan Ping, Wang Keqiang, Yan Xueting, Wang Yingchen, Zhang Lei, Gao Jiyang, Ding Zhonghua, Xu Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With the ethical concern about the dose of CT scan and wide use of CT in protocol of suspected renal colic, more attention has been paid to low dose CT. The aim of the present study was to make a comparison of unenhanced low-dose spiral CT localization with unenhanced standard-dose spiral CT in patients with upper urinary tract calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) treatment. METHODS: Twenty eight patients with ureter and renal calculus, preparing to take MPCNL, underwent both abdominal low-dose CT (25 mAs) and standard-dose CT (100 mAs). Low-dose CT and standard-dose CT were independently evaluated for the characterization of renal/ureteral calculi, perirenal adjacent organs, blood vessels, indirect signs of renal or ureteral calculus (renal enlargement, pyeloureteral dilatation), and the indices of localization (percutaneous puncture angulation and depth) used in the MPCNL procedure. RESULTS: In all 28 patients, low-dose CT was 100 per cent coincidence 100 per cent sensitive and 100 per cent specific for depicting the location of the renal and ureteral calculus, renal enlargement, pyeloureteral dilatation, adjacent organs, and the presumptive puncture point and a 96.3 per cent coincidence 96 per cent sensitivity and 93 per cent specificity for blood vessel signs within the renal sinus, and with an obvious lower radiation exposure for patients when compared to standard-dose CT (P<0.05). The indices of puncture depth, puncture angulation, and maximum calculus transverse diameter on the axial surface showed no significant difference between the two doses of CT scans, with a significant variation in calculus visualization slice numbers (P<0.05). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that unenhanced low-dose CT achieves a sensitivity and accuracy similar to that of standard-dose CT in assessing the localization of renal ureteral calculus and adjacent organs conditions and identifying the maximum calculus transverse diameter on the axial surface, percutaneous puncture depth, and angulation in patients, with a significant lower radiation exposure, who are to be treated by MPCNL, and can be used as an alternative localization method. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4069732/ /pubmed/24820832 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Licheng, Jiang
Yidong, Fan
Ping, Wang
Keqiang, Yan
Xueting, Wang
Yingchen, Zhang
Lei, Gao
Jiyang, Ding
Zhonghua, Xu
Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)
title Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)
title_full Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)
title_fullStr Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)
title_full_unstemmed Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)
title_short Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)
title_sort unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose ct localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mpcnl)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4069732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24820832
work_keys_str_mv AT lichengjiang unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT yidongfan unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT pingwang unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT keqiangyan unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT xuetingwang unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT yingchenzhang unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT leigao unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT jiyangding unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl
AT zhonghuaxu unenhancedlowdoseversusstandarddosectlocalizationinpatientswithupperurinarycalculiforminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomympcnl