Cargando…

Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This study examines the cost effectiveness of group follow-up after participation in the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) structured education programme for type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 437 adul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillespie, Paddy, O'Shea, Eamon, O’Hara, Mary Clare, Dinneen, Sean F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24927851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-227
_version_ 1782322641220141056
author Gillespie, Paddy
O'Shea, Eamon
O’Hara, Mary Clare
Dinneen, Sean F
author_facet Gillespie, Paddy
O'Shea, Eamon
O’Hara, Mary Clare
Dinneen, Sean F
author_sort Gillespie, Paddy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study examines the cost effectiveness of group follow-up after participation in the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) structured education programme for type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 437 adults with type 1 diabetes in Ireland. Group follow-up involved two group education ‘booster’ sessions post-DAFNE. Individual follow-up involved two standard one-to-one hospital clinic visits. Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and cost effectiveness were estimated at 18 months. Uncertainty was explored using sensitivity analysis and by estimating cost effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: Group follow-up was associated with a mean reduction in QALYs gained of 0.04 per patient (P value, 0.052; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01, intra-class correlation (ICC), 0.033) and a mean reduction in total healthcare costs of €772 (P value, 0.020; 95% CI, −1,415 to −128: ICC, 0.016) per patient. At alternative threshold values of €5,000, €15,000, €25,000, €35,000, and €45,000, the probability of group follow-up being cost effective was estimated to be 1.000, 0.762, 0.204, 0.078, and 0.033 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support implementation of group follow-up as the sole means of follow-up post-DAFNE. Given the reported cost savings, future studies should explore the cost effectiveness of alternative models of group care for diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN79759174 (assigned: 9 February 2007).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4070096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40700962014-06-26 Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial Gillespie, Paddy O'Shea, Eamon O’Hara, Mary Clare Dinneen, Sean F Trials Research BACKGROUND: This study examines the cost effectiveness of group follow-up after participation in the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) structured education programme for type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 437 adults with type 1 diabetes in Ireland. Group follow-up involved two group education ‘booster’ sessions post-DAFNE. Individual follow-up involved two standard one-to-one hospital clinic visits. Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and cost effectiveness were estimated at 18 months. Uncertainty was explored using sensitivity analysis and by estimating cost effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: Group follow-up was associated with a mean reduction in QALYs gained of 0.04 per patient (P value, 0.052; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01, intra-class correlation (ICC), 0.033) and a mean reduction in total healthcare costs of €772 (P value, 0.020; 95% CI, −1,415 to −128: ICC, 0.016) per patient. At alternative threshold values of €5,000, €15,000, €25,000, €35,000, and €45,000, the probability of group follow-up being cost effective was estimated to be 1.000, 0.762, 0.204, 0.078, and 0.033 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support implementation of group follow-up as the sole means of follow-up post-DAFNE. Given the reported cost savings, future studies should explore the cost effectiveness of alternative models of group care for diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN79759174 (assigned: 9 February 2007). BioMed Central 2014-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4070096/ /pubmed/24927851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-227 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gillespie et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Gillespie, Paddy
O'Shea, Eamon
O’Hara, Mary Clare
Dinneen, Sean F
Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24927851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-227
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespiepaddy costeffectivenessofgroupfollowupafterstructurededucationfortype1diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT osheaeamon costeffectivenessofgroupfollowupafterstructurededucationfortype1diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oharamaryclare costeffectivenessofgroupfollowupafterstructurededucationfortype1diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dinneenseanf costeffectivenessofgroupfollowupafterstructurededucationfortype1diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial