Cargando…
Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?
BACKGROUND: Recent changes in health care delivery may reduce continuity with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP). Little is known about the association between continuity and quality of communication during ongoing efforts to redesign primary care in the Veterans Administration (VA). OBJECTIV...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24072718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2633-8 |
_version_ | 1782322666533814272 |
---|---|
author | Katz, David A. McCoy, Kim Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan |
author_facet | Katz, David A. McCoy, Kim Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan |
author_sort | Katz, David A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent changes in health care delivery may reduce continuity with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP). Little is known about the association between continuity and quality of communication during ongoing efforts to redesign primary care in the Veterans Administration (VA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between longitudinal continuity of care (COC) with the same PCP and ratings of patient–provider communication during the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) initiative. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand three hundred ninety-three VA outpatients who were assigned to a PCP, had at least three primary care visits to physicians or physician extenders during Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 (combined), and who completed the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) following a primary care visit in Fiscal Year (FY)2011. MAIN MEASURES: Usual Provider of Continuity (UPC), Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI), and duration of PCP care were calculated for each primary care patient. UPC and MMCI values were categorized as follows: 1.0 (perfect), 0.75–0.99 (high), 0.50–0.74 (intermediate), and < 0.50 (low). Quality of communication was measured using the four-item Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-Health Plan program (CAHPS-HP) communication subscale and a two-item measure of shared decision-making (SDM). Excellent care was defined using an “all-or-none” scoring strategy (i.e., when all items within a scale were rated “always”). KEY RESULTS: UPC and MMCI continuity remained high (0.81) during the early phase of PACT implementation. In multivariable models, low MMCI continuity was associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.74, 95 % CI = 0.58–0.95) and SDM (OR = 0.70, 95 % CI = 0.49, 0.99). Abbreviated duration of PCP care (< 1 year) was also associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI = 0.18, 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced PCP continuity may significantly decrease the quality of patient–provider communication in VA primary care. By improving longitudinal continuity with the assigned PCP, while redesigning team-based roles, the PACT initiative has the potential to improve patient–provider communication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4070228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40702282014-06-25 Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? Katz, David A. McCoy, Kim Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent changes in health care delivery may reduce continuity with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP). Little is known about the association between continuity and quality of communication during ongoing efforts to redesign primary care in the Veterans Administration (VA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between longitudinal continuity of care (COC) with the same PCP and ratings of patient–provider communication during the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) initiative. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand three hundred ninety-three VA outpatients who were assigned to a PCP, had at least three primary care visits to physicians or physician extenders during Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 (combined), and who completed the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) following a primary care visit in Fiscal Year (FY)2011. MAIN MEASURES: Usual Provider of Continuity (UPC), Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI), and duration of PCP care were calculated for each primary care patient. UPC and MMCI values were categorized as follows: 1.0 (perfect), 0.75–0.99 (high), 0.50–0.74 (intermediate), and < 0.50 (low). Quality of communication was measured using the four-item Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-Health Plan program (CAHPS-HP) communication subscale and a two-item measure of shared decision-making (SDM). Excellent care was defined using an “all-or-none” scoring strategy (i.e., when all items within a scale were rated “always”). KEY RESULTS: UPC and MMCI continuity remained high (0.81) during the early phase of PACT implementation. In multivariable models, low MMCI continuity was associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.74, 95 % CI = 0.58–0.95) and SDM (OR = 0.70, 95 % CI = 0.49, 0.99). Abbreviated duration of PCP care (< 1 year) was also associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI = 0.18, 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced PCP continuity may significantly decrease the quality of patient–provider communication in VA primary care. By improving longitudinal continuity with the assigned PCP, while redesigning team-based roles, the PACT initiative has the potential to improve patient–provider communication. Springer US 2013-09-26 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4070228/ /pubmed/24072718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2633-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Katz, David A. McCoy, Kim Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? |
title | Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? |
title_full | Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? |
title_fullStr | Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? |
title_short | Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? |
title_sort | does improved continuity of primary care affect clinician–patient communication in va? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24072718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2633-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katzdavida doesimprovedcontinuityofprimarycareaffectclinicianpatientcommunicationinva AT mccoykim doesimprovedcontinuityofprimarycareaffectclinicianpatientcommunicationinva AT sarrazinmaryvaughan doesimprovedcontinuityofprimarycareaffectclinicianpatientcommunicationinva |