Cargando…

Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?

BACKGROUND: Recent changes in health care delivery may reduce continuity with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP). Little is known about the association between continuity and quality of communication during ongoing efforts to redesign primary care in the Veterans Administration (VA). OBJECTIV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katz, David A., McCoy, Kim, Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24072718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2633-8
_version_ 1782322666533814272
author Katz, David A.
McCoy, Kim
Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan
author_facet Katz, David A.
McCoy, Kim
Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan
author_sort Katz, David A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent changes in health care delivery may reduce continuity with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP). Little is known about the association between continuity and quality of communication during ongoing efforts to redesign primary care in the Veterans Administration (VA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between longitudinal continuity of care (COC) with the same PCP and ratings of patient–provider communication during the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) initiative. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand three hundred ninety-three VA outpatients who were assigned to a PCP, had at least three primary care visits to physicians or physician extenders during Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 (combined), and who completed the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) following a primary care visit in Fiscal Year (FY)2011. MAIN MEASURES: Usual Provider of Continuity (UPC), Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI), and duration of PCP care were calculated for each primary care patient. UPC and MMCI values were categorized as follows: 1.0 (perfect), 0.75–0.99 (high), 0.50–0.74 (intermediate), and < 0.50 (low). Quality of communication was measured using the four-item Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-Health Plan program (CAHPS-HP) communication subscale and a two-item measure of shared decision-making (SDM). Excellent care was defined using an “all-or-none” scoring strategy (i.e., when all items within a scale were rated “always”). KEY RESULTS: UPC and MMCI continuity remained high (0.81) during the early phase of PACT implementation. In multivariable models, low MMCI continuity was associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.74, 95 % CI = 0.58–0.95) and SDM (OR = 0.70, 95 % CI = 0.49, 0.99). Abbreviated duration of PCP care (< 1 year) was also associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI = 0.18, 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced PCP continuity may significantly decrease the quality of patient–provider communication in VA primary care. By improving longitudinal continuity with the assigned PCP, while redesigning team-based roles, the PACT initiative has the potential to improve patient–provider communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4070228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40702282014-06-25 Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA? Katz, David A. McCoy, Kim Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent changes in health care delivery may reduce continuity with the patient’s primary care provider (PCP). Little is known about the association between continuity and quality of communication during ongoing efforts to redesign primary care in the Veterans Administration (VA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between longitudinal continuity of care (COC) with the same PCP and ratings of patient–provider communication during the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) initiative. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand three hundred ninety-three VA outpatients who were assigned to a PCP, had at least three primary care visits to physicians or physician extenders during Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 (combined), and who completed the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) following a primary care visit in Fiscal Year (FY)2011. MAIN MEASURES: Usual Provider of Continuity (UPC), Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI), and duration of PCP care were calculated for each primary care patient. UPC and MMCI values were categorized as follows: 1.0 (perfect), 0.75–0.99 (high), 0.50–0.74 (intermediate), and < 0.50 (low). Quality of communication was measured using the four-item Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-Health Plan program (CAHPS-HP) communication subscale and a two-item measure of shared decision-making (SDM). Excellent care was defined using an “all-or-none” scoring strategy (i.e., when all items within a scale were rated “always”). KEY RESULTS: UPC and MMCI continuity remained high (0.81) during the early phase of PACT implementation. In multivariable models, low MMCI continuity was associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.74, 95 % CI = 0.58–0.95) and SDM (OR = 0.70, 95 % CI = 0.49, 0.99). Abbreviated duration of PCP care (< 1 year) was also associated with decreased odds of excellent communication (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI = 0.18, 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced PCP continuity may significantly decrease the quality of patient–provider communication in VA primary care. By improving longitudinal continuity with the assigned PCP, while redesigning team-based roles, the PACT initiative has the potential to improve patient–provider communication. Springer US 2013-09-26 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4070228/ /pubmed/24072718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2633-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Katz, David A.
McCoy, Kim
Sarrazin, Mary Vaughan
Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?
title Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?
title_full Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?
title_fullStr Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?
title_full_unstemmed Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?
title_short Does Improved Continuity of Primary Care Affect Clinician–Patient Communication in VA?
title_sort does improved continuity of primary care affect clinician–patient communication in va?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24072718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2633-8
work_keys_str_mv AT katzdavida doesimprovedcontinuityofprimarycareaffectclinicianpatientcommunicationinva
AT mccoykim doesimprovedcontinuityofprimarycareaffectclinicianpatientcommunicationinva
AT sarrazinmaryvaughan doesimprovedcontinuityofprimarycareaffectclinicianpatientcommunicationinva