Cargando…

Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites

Human amniotic membrane (HAM) has been used as a biomaterial in various surgical procedures and exceeds some qualities of common materials. We evaluated HAM as wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft (STSG) donor sites in a swine model (Part A) and a clinical trial (Part B). Part A: STSG donor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loeffelbein, Denys J., Rohleder, Nils H., Eddicks, Matthias, Baumann, Claudia M., Stoeckelhuber, Mechthild, Wolff, Klaus-D., Drecoll, Enken, Steinstraesser, Lars, Hennerbichler, Simone, Kesting, Marco R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/572183
_version_ 1782322696207466496
author Loeffelbein, Denys J.
Rohleder, Nils H.
Eddicks, Matthias
Baumann, Claudia M.
Stoeckelhuber, Mechthild
Wolff, Klaus-D.
Drecoll, Enken
Steinstraesser, Lars
Hennerbichler, Simone
Kesting, Marco R.
author_facet Loeffelbein, Denys J.
Rohleder, Nils H.
Eddicks, Matthias
Baumann, Claudia M.
Stoeckelhuber, Mechthild
Wolff, Klaus-D.
Drecoll, Enken
Steinstraesser, Lars
Hennerbichler, Simone
Kesting, Marco R.
author_sort Loeffelbein, Denys J.
collection PubMed
description Human amniotic membrane (HAM) has been used as a biomaterial in various surgical procedures and exceeds some qualities of common materials. We evaluated HAM as wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft (STSG) donor sites in a swine model (Part A) and a clinical trial (Part B). Part A: STSG donor sites in 4 piglets were treated with HAM or a clinically used conventional polyurethane (PU) foil (n = 8 each). Biopsies were taken on days 5, 7, 10, 20, 40, and 60 and investigated immunohistochemically for alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA: wound contraction marker), von Willebrand factor (vWF: angiogenesis), Ki-67 (cell proliferation), and laminin (basement membrane integrity). Part B: STSG donor sites in 45 adult patients (16 female/29 male) were treated with HAM covered by PU foam, solely by PU foam, or PU foil/paraffin gauze (n = 15 each). Part A revealed no difference in the rate of wound closure between groups. HAM showed improved esthetic results and inhibitory effects on cicatrization. Angioneogenesis was reduced, and basement membrane formation was accelerated in HAM group. Part B: no difference in re-epithelialization/infection rate was found. HAM caused less ichor exudation and less pruritus. HAM has no relevant advantage over conventional dressings but might be a cost-effective alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4070483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40704832014-07-07 Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites Loeffelbein, Denys J. Rohleder, Nils H. Eddicks, Matthias Baumann, Claudia M. Stoeckelhuber, Mechthild Wolff, Klaus-D. Drecoll, Enken Steinstraesser, Lars Hennerbichler, Simone Kesting, Marco R. Biomed Res Int Research Article Human amniotic membrane (HAM) has been used as a biomaterial in various surgical procedures and exceeds some qualities of common materials. We evaluated HAM as wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft (STSG) donor sites in a swine model (Part A) and a clinical trial (Part B). Part A: STSG donor sites in 4 piglets were treated with HAM or a clinically used conventional polyurethane (PU) foil (n = 8 each). Biopsies were taken on days 5, 7, 10, 20, 40, and 60 and investigated immunohistochemically for alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA: wound contraction marker), von Willebrand factor (vWF: angiogenesis), Ki-67 (cell proliferation), and laminin (basement membrane integrity). Part B: STSG donor sites in 45 adult patients (16 female/29 male) were treated with HAM covered by PU foam, solely by PU foam, or PU foil/paraffin gauze (n = 15 each). Part A revealed no difference in the rate of wound closure between groups. HAM showed improved esthetic results and inhibitory effects on cicatrization. Angioneogenesis was reduced, and basement membrane formation was accelerated in HAM group. Part B: no difference in re-epithelialization/infection rate was found. HAM caused less ichor exudation and less pruritus. HAM has no relevant advantage over conventional dressings but might be a cost-effective alternative. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4070483/ /pubmed/25003117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/572183 Text en Copyright © 2014 Denys J. Loeffelbein et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Loeffelbein, Denys J.
Rohleder, Nils H.
Eddicks, Matthias
Baumann, Claudia M.
Stoeckelhuber, Mechthild
Wolff, Klaus-D.
Drecoll, Enken
Steinstraesser, Lars
Hennerbichler, Simone
Kesting, Marco R.
Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites
title Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites
title_full Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites
title_fullStr Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites
title_short Evaluation of Human Amniotic Membrane as a Wound Dressing for Split-Thickness Skin-Graft Donor Sites
title_sort evaluation of human amniotic membrane as a wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft donor sites
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/572183
work_keys_str_mv AT loeffelbeindenysj evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT rohledernilsh evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT eddicksmatthias evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT baumannclaudiam evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT stoeckelhubermechthild evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT wolffklausd evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT drecollenken evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT steinstraesserlars evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT hennerbichlersimone evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites
AT kestingmarcor evaluationofhumanamnioticmembraneasawounddressingforsplitthicknessskingraftdonorsites