Cargando…

Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)

INTRODUCTION: To determine the esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions after autologous and allogeneic bone grafting. METHODS: From 2003 to 2009, 67 patients underwent alveolar ridge augmentation and were enrolled in the study, 41 meet the inclusion criteria and 31 agreed to take part in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlee, Markus, Dehner, Jan-Friedrich, Baukloh, Katja, Happe, Arndt, Seitz, Oliver, Sader, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-21
_version_ 1782322718210785280
author Schlee, Markus
Dehner, Jan-Friedrich
Baukloh, Katja
Happe, Arndt
Seitz, Oliver
Sader, Robert
author_facet Schlee, Markus
Dehner, Jan-Friedrich
Baukloh, Katja
Happe, Arndt
Seitz, Oliver
Sader, Robert
author_sort Schlee, Markus
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To determine the esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions after autologous and allogeneic bone grafting. METHODS: From 2003 to 2009, 67 patients underwent alveolar ridge augmentation and were enrolled in the study, 41 meet the inclusion criteria and 31 agreed to take part in the study. Patients were 18-69 years old (mean: 49.3 ± 13.8 years), and predominantly female. Patients received bone block grafts either autologous (n = 48) (AUBB) or allografts (ABB) (n = 19). Implants were inserted 4-7 months (autografts) or 5-6 months (allografts) after bone grafting. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES) as well as radiographic and subjective assessments were employed for the outcome analysis. The PES was assessed twice within one month based on digital photographic images that were randomly rearranged between evaluations by three independent, experienced investigators. RESULTS: Across all observations and investigators, the average PES was 7.5 ± 2.6 without differences between implants inserted in auto- and allografted bone, respectively. Patients assessed the allograft procedures as less painful and would have repeated it more often. The intra-rater reliability was excellent (correlation coefficients 0.7-0.9). The inter-observer agreement was lower (correlation coefficients 0.6-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Bone grafting with ABB allografts yields equivalent results to autologous grafting, and patients appreciate the omission of bone harvesting. The PES is a reliable method but should be performed by the same individual.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4070637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40706372014-06-26 Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES) Schlee, Markus Dehner, Jan-Friedrich Baukloh, Katja Happe, Arndt Seitz, Oliver Sader, Robert Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: To determine the esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions after autologous and allogeneic bone grafting. METHODS: From 2003 to 2009, 67 patients underwent alveolar ridge augmentation and were enrolled in the study, 41 meet the inclusion criteria and 31 agreed to take part in the study. Patients were 18-69 years old (mean: 49.3 ± 13.8 years), and predominantly female. Patients received bone block grafts either autologous (n = 48) (AUBB) or allografts (ABB) (n = 19). Implants were inserted 4-7 months (autografts) or 5-6 months (allografts) after bone grafting. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES) as well as radiographic and subjective assessments were employed for the outcome analysis. The PES was assessed twice within one month based on digital photographic images that were randomly rearranged between evaluations by three independent, experienced investigators. RESULTS: Across all observations and investigators, the average PES was 7.5 ± 2.6 without differences between implants inserted in auto- and allografted bone, respectively. Patients assessed the allograft procedures as less painful and would have repeated it more often. The intra-rater reliability was excellent (correlation coefficients 0.7-0.9). The inter-observer agreement was lower (correlation coefficients 0.6-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Bone grafting with ABB allografts yields equivalent results to autologous grafting, and patients appreciate the omission of bone harvesting. The PES is a reliable method but should be performed by the same individual. BioMed Central 2014-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4070637/ /pubmed/24885136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-21 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schlee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Schlee, Markus
Dehner, Jan-Friedrich
Baukloh, Katja
Happe, Arndt
Seitz, Oliver
Sader, Robert
Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)
title Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)
title_full Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)
title_fullStr Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)
title_full_unstemmed Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)
title_short Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES)
title_sort esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (pes)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-21
work_keys_str_mv AT schleemarkus estheticoutcomeofimplantbasedreconstructionsinaugmentedbonecomparisonofautologousandallogeneicboneblockgraftingwiththepinkestheticscorepes
AT dehnerjanfriedrich estheticoutcomeofimplantbasedreconstructionsinaugmentedbonecomparisonofautologousandallogeneicboneblockgraftingwiththepinkestheticscorepes
AT bauklohkatja estheticoutcomeofimplantbasedreconstructionsinaugmentedbonecomparisonofautologousandallogeneicboneblockgraftingwiththepinkestheticscorepes
AT happearndt estheticoutcomeofimplantbasedreconstructionsinaugmentedbonecomparisonofautologousandallogeneicboneblockgraftingwiththepinkestheticscorepes
AT seitzoliver estheticoutcomeofimplantbasedreconstructionsinaugmentedbonecomparisonofautologousandallogeneicboneblockgraftingwiththepinkestheticscorepes
AT saderrobert estheticoutcomeofimplantbasedreconstructionsinaugmentedbonecomparisonofautologousandallogeneicboneblockgraftingwiththepinkestheticscorepes