Cargando…
Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most relevant yeast species conducting the alcoholic fermentation that takes place during winemaking. Although the physiology of this model organism has been extensively studied, systematic quantitative physiology studies of this yeast under winemaking con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24928139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-85 |
_version_ | 1782322721692057600 |
---|---|
author | Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas Silva, Paulina Barreiro, Antonio Martínez-Moreno, Rubén Morales, Pilar Quirós, Manuel González, Ramón Albiol, Joan Ferrer, Pau |
author_facet | Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas Silva, Paulina Barreiro, Antonio Martínez-Moreno, Rubén Morales, Pilar Quirós, Manuel González, Ramón Albiol, Joan Ferrer, Pau |
author_sort | Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most relevant yeast species conducting the alcoholic fermentation that takes place during winemaking. Although the physiology of this model organism has been extensively studied, systematic quantitative physiology studies of this yeast under winemaking conditions are still scarce, thus limiting the understanding of fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains and the systematic description, modelling and prediction of fermentation processes. In this study, we implemented and validated the use of chemostat cultures as a tool to simulate different stages of a standard wine fermentation, thereby allowing to implement metabolic flux analyses describing the sequence of metabolic states of S. cerevisae along the wine fermentation. RESULTS: Chemostat cultures mimicking the different stages of standard wine fermentations of S. cerevisiae EC1118 were performed using a synthetic must and strict anaerobic conditions. The simulated stages corresponded to the onset of the exponential growth phase, late exponential growth phase and cells just entering stationary phase, at dilution rates of 0.27, 0.04, 0.007 h(−1), respectively. Notably, measured substrate uptake and product formation rates at each steady state condition were generally within the range of corresponding conversion rates estimated during the different batch fermentation stages. Moreover, chemostat data were further used for metabolic flux analysis, where biomass composition data for each condition was considered in the stoichiometric model. Metabolic flux distributions were coherent with previous analyses based on batch cultivations data and the pseudo-steady state assumption. CONCLUSIONS: Steady state conditions obtained in chemostat cultures reflect the environmental conditions and physiological states of S. cerevisiae corresponding to the different growth stages of a typical batch wine fermentation, thereby showing the potential of this experimental approach to systematically study the effect of environmental relevant factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, C/N ratio or (micro) oxygenation on the fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4070652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40706522014-06-27 Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas Silva, Paulina Barreiro, Antonio Martínez-Moreno, Rubén Morales, Pilar Quirós, Manuel González, Ramón Albiol, Joan Ferrer, Pau Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most relevant yeast species conducting the alcoholic fermentation that takes place during winemaking. Although the physiology of this model organism has been extensively studied, systematic quantitative physiology studies of this yeast under winemaking conditions are still scarce, thus limiting the understanding of fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains and the systematic description, modelling and prediction of fermentation processes. In this study, we implemented and validated the use of chemostat cultures as a tool to simulate different stages of a standard wine fermentation, thereby allowing to implement metabolic flux analyses describing the sequence of metabolic states of S. cerevisae along the wine fermentation. RESULTS: Chemostat cultures mimicking the different stages of standard wine fermentations of S. cerevisiae EC1118 were performed using a synthetic must and strict anaerobic conditions. The simulated stages corresponded to the onset of the exponential growth phase, late exponential growth phase and cells just entering stationary phase, at dilution rates of 0.27, 0.04, 0.007 h(−1), respectively. Notably, measured substrate uptake and product formation rates at each steady state condition were generally within the range of corresponding conversion rates estimated during the different batch fermentation stages. Moreover, chemostat data were further used for metabolic flux analysis, where biomass composition data for each condition was considered in the stoichiometric model. Metabolic flux distributions were coherent with previous analyses based on batch cultivations data and the pseudo-steady state assumption. CONCLUSIONS: Steady state conditions obtained in chemostat cultures reflect the environmental conditions and physiological states of S. cerevisiae corresponding to the different growth stages of a typical batch wine fermentation, thereby showing the potential of this experimental approach to systematically study the effect of environmental relevant factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, C/N ratio or (micro) oxygenation on the fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains. BioMed Central 2014-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4070652/ /pubmed/24928139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-85 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vázquez-Lima et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas Silva, Paulina Barreiro, Antonio Martínez-Moreno, Rubén Morales, Pilar Quirós, Manuel González, Ramón Albiol, Joan Ferrer, Pau Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis |
title | Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis |
title_full | Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis |
title_fullStr | Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis |
title_short | Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis |
title_sort | use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24928139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-85 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazquezlimafelicitas useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT silvapaulina useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT barreiroantonio useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT martinezmorenoruben useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT moralespilar useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT quirosmanuel useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT gonzalezramon useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT albioljoan useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis AT ferrerpau useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis |