Cargando…

Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis

BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most relevant yeast species conducting the alcoholic fermentation that takes place during winemaking. Although the physiology of this model organism has been extensively studied, systematic quantitative physiology studies of this yeast under winemaking con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas, Silva, Paulina, Barreiro, Antonio, Martínez-Moreno, Rubén, Morales, Pilar, Quirós, Manuel, González, Ramón, Albiol, Joan, Ferrer, Pau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24928139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-85
_version_ 1782322721692057600
author Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas
Silva, Paulina
Barreiro, Antonio
Martínez-Moreno, Rubén
Morales, Pilar
Quirós, Manuel
González, Ramón
Albiol, Joan
Ferrer, Pau
author_facet Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas
Silva, Paulina
Barreiro, Antonio
Martínez-Moreno, Rubén
Morales, Pilar
Quirós, Manuel
González, Ramón
Albiol, Joan
Ferrer, Pau
author_sort Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most relevant yeast species conducting the alcoholic fermentation that takes place during winemaking. Although the physiology of this model organism has been extensively studied, systematic quantitative physiology studies of this yeast under winemaking conditions are still scarce, thus limiting the understanding of fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains and the systematic description, modelling and prediction of fermentation processes. In this study, we implemented and validated the use of chemostat cultures as a tool to simulate different stages of a standard wine fermentation, thereby allowing to implement metabolic flux analyses describing the sequence of metabolic states of S. cerevisae along the wine fermentation. RESULTS: Chemostat cultures mimicking the different stages of standard wine fermentations of S. cerevisiae EC1118 were performed using a synthetic must and strict anaerobic conditions. The simulated stages corresponded to the onset of the exponential growth phase, late exponential growth phase and cells just entering stationary phase, at dilution rates of 0.27, 0.04, 0.007 h(−1), respectively. Notably, measured substrate uptake and product formation rates at each steady state condition were generally within the range of corresponding conversion rates estimated during the different batch fermentation stages. Moreover, chemostat data were further used for metabolic flux analysis, where biomass composition data for each condition was considered in the stoichiometric model. Metabolic flux distributions were coherent with previous analyses based on batch cultivations data and the pseudo-steady state assumption. CONCLUSIONS: Steady state conditions obtained in chemostat cultures reflect the environmental conditions and physiological states of S. cerevisiae corresponding to the different growth stages of a typical batch wine fermentation, thereby showing the potential of this experimental approach to systematically study the effect of environmental relevant factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, C/N ratio or (micro) oxygenation on the fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4070652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40706522014-06-27 Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas Silva, Paulina Barreiro, Antonio Martínez-Moreno, Rubén Morales, Pilar Quirós, Manuel González, Ramón Albiol, Joan Ferrer, Pau Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most relevant yeast species conducting the alcoholic fermentation that takes place during winemaking. Although the physiology of this model organism has been extensively studied, systematic quantitative physiology studies of this yeast under winemaking conditions are still scarce, thus limiting the understanding of fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains and the systematic description, modelling and prediction of fermentation processes. In this study, we implemented and validated the use of chemostat cultures as a tool to simulate different stages of a standard wine fermentation, thereby allowing to implement metabolic flux analyses describing the sequence of metabolic states of S. cerevisae along the wine fermentation. RESULTS: Chemostat cultures mimicking the different stages of standard wine fermentations of S. cerevisiae EC1118 were performed using a synthetic must and strict anaerobic conditions. The simulated stages corresponded to the onset of the exponential growth phase, late exponential growth phase and cells just entering stationary phase, at dilution rates of 0.27, 0.04, 0.007 h(−1), respectively. Notably, measured substrate uptake and product formation rates at each steady state condition were generally within the range of corresponding conversion rates estimated during the different batch fermentation stages. Moreover, chemostat data were further used for metabolic flux analysis, where biomass composition data for each condition was considered in the stoichiometric model. Metabolic flux distributions were coherent with previous analyses based on batch cultivations data and the pseudo-steady state assumption. CONCLUSIONS: Steady state conditions obtained in chemostat cultures reflect the environmental conditions and physiological states of S. cerevisiae corresponding to the different growth stages of a typical batch wine fermentation, thereby showing the potential of this experimental approach to systematically study the effect of environmental relevant factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, C/N ratio or (micro) oxygenation on the fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains. BioMed Central 2014-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4070652/ /pubmed/24928139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-85 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vázquez-Lima et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Vázquez-Lima, Felícitas
Silva, Paulina
Barreiro, Antonio
Martínez-Moreno, Rubén
Morales, Pilar
Quirós, Manuel
González, Ramón
Albiol, Joan
Ferrer, Pau
Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
title Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
title_full Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
title_fullStr Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
title_short Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
title_sort use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24928139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-85
work_keys_str_mv AT vazquezlimafelicitas useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT silvapaulina useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT barreiroantonio useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT martinezmorenoruben useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT moralespilar useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT quirosmanuel useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT gonzalezramon useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT albioljoan useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis
AT ferrerpau useofchemostatculturesmimickingdifferentphasesofwinefermentationsasatoolforquantitativephysiologicalanalysis