Cargando…
Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis?
Background: The major aneuploidies that are diagnosed prenatally involve the autosomal chromosomes 13, 18, and 21, as well as sex chromosomes, X and Y. Because multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is rapid and non-invasive, it has replaced traditional culture methods for the scree...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Research and Clinical Center for Infertility
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4071631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24976821 |
_version_ | 1782322824291024896 |
---|---|
author | Omrani, Mir Davood Azizi, Faezeh Rajabibazl, Masoumeh Safavi Naini, Niloufar Omrani, Sara Abbasi, Arezo Mona Saleh Gargari, Soraya |
author_facet | Omrani, Mir Davood Azizi, Faezeh Rajabibazl, Masoumeh Safavi Naini, Niloufar Omrani, Sara Abbasi, Arezo Mona Saleh Gargari, Soraya |
author_sort | Omrani, Mir Davood |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The major aneuploidies that are diagnosed prenatally involve the autosomal chromosomes 13, 18, and 21, as well as sex chromosomes, X and Y. Because multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is rapid and non-invasive, it has replaced traditional culture methods for the screening and diagnosis of common aneuploidies in some countries. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MLPA in a cross-sectional descriptive study for the detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in comparison to other methods. Materials and Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood samples of 10 normal controls and the amniotic fluid of 55 patients. Aneuploidies screening of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were carried out using specific MLPA probe mixes (P095-A2). For comparison purposes, samples were also tested by Quantitative Fluorescent-PCR (QF-PCR) and routine chromosomal culture method. Results: Using this specific MLPA technique and data-analyzing software (Genemarker v1.85), one case was diagnosed with 45, X (e.g. Monosomy X or Turner’s Syndrome), and the remaining 54 cases revealed normal karyotypes. These results were concordant with routine chromosomal culture and QF-PCR findings. Conclusion: The experiment demonstrates that MLPA can provide a rapid and accurate clinical method for prenatal identification of common chromosomal aneuploidies with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4071631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Research and Clinical Center for Infertility |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40716312014-06-27 Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis? Omrani, Mir Davood Azizi, Faezeh Rajabibazl, Masoumeh Safavi Naini, Niloufar Omrani, Sara Abbasi, Arezo Mona Saleh Gargari, Soraya Iran J Reprod Med Original Article Background: The major aneuploidies that are diagnosed prenatally involve the autosomal chromosomes 13, 18, and 21, as well as sex chromosomes, X and Y. Because multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is rapid and non-invasive, it has replaced traditional culture methods for the screening and diagnosis of common aneuploidies in some countries. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MLPA in a cross-sectional descriptive study for the detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in comparison to other methods. Materials and Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood samples of 10 normal controls and the amniotic fluid of 55 patients. Aneuploidies screening of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were carried out using specific MLPA probe mixes (P095-A2). For comparison purposes, samples were also tested by Quantitative Fluorescent-PCR (QF-PCR) and routine chromosomal culture method. Results: Using this specific MLPA technique and data-analyzing software (Genemarker v1.85), one case was diagnosed with 45, X (e.g. Monosomy X or Turner’s Syndrome), and the remaining 54 cases revealed normal karyotypes. These results were concordant with routine chromosomal culture and QF-PCR findings. Conclusion: The experiment demonstrates that MLPA can provide a rapid and accurate clinical method for prenatal identification of common chromosomal aneuploidies with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4071631/ /pubmed/24976821 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Omrani, Mir Davood Azizi, Faezeh Rajabibazl, Masoumeh Safavi Naini, Niloufar Omrani, Sara Abbasi, Arezo Mona Saleh Gargari, Soraya Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis? |
title | Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis? |
title_full | Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis? |
title_fullStr | Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis? |
title_short | Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis? |
title_sort | can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (mlpa) for prenatal diagnosis? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4071631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24976821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omranimirdavood canwerelyonthemultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmethodmlpaforprenataldiagnosis AT azizifaezeh canwerelyonthemultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmethodmlpaforprenataldiagnosis AT rajabibazlmasoumeh canwerelyonthemultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmethodmlpaforprenataldiagnosis AT safavinaininiloufar canwerelyonthemultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmethodmlpaforprenataldiagnosis AT omranisara canwerelyonthemultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmethodmlpaforprenataldiagnosis AT abbasiarezomona canwerelyonthemultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmethodmlpaforprenataldiagnosis AT salehgargarisoraya canwerelyonthemultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmethodmlpaforprenataldiagnosis |