Cargando…
Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods
AIM: Dechallenge is a response observed for the reduction or disappearance of adverse drug reactions (ADR) on withdrawal of a drug from a patient. Currently available algorithms to detect dechallenge have limitations. Hence, there is a need to compare available new methods. To detect dechallenge in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4071703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987173 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.132157 |
_version_ | 1782322840623644672 |
---|---|
author | Banu, A. Bazila Alias Balamurugan, S. Appavu Thirumalaikolundusubramanian, Ponniah |
author_facet | Banu, A. Bazila Alias Balamurugan, S. Appavu Thirumalaikolundusubramanian, Ponniah |
author_sort | Banu, A. Bazila |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Dechallenge is a response observed for the reduction or disappearance of adverse drug reactions (ADR) on withdrawal of a drug from a patient. Currently available algorithms to detect dechallenge have limitations. Hence, there is a need to compare available new methods. To detect dechallenge in Spontaneous Reporting Systems, data-mining algorithms like Naive Bayes and Improved Naive Bayes were applied for comparing the performance of the algorithms in terms of accuracy and error. Analyzing the factors of dechallenge like outcome and disease category will help medical practitioners and pharmaceutical industries to determine the reasons for dechallenge in order to take essential steps toward drug safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adverse drug reactions of the year 2011 and 2012 were downloaded from the United States Food and Drug Administration's database. RESULTS: The outcome of classification algorithms showed that Improved Naive Bayes algorithm outperformed Naive Bayes with accuracy of 90.11% and error of 9.8% in detecting the dechallenge. CONCLUSION: Detecting dechallenge for unknown samples are essential for proper prescription. To overcome the issues exposed by Naive Bayes algorithm, Improved Naive Bayes algorithm can be used to detect dechallenge in terms of higher accuracy and minimal error. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4071703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40717032014-07-01 Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods Banu, A. Bazila Alias Balamurugan, S. Appavu Thirumalaikolundusubramanian, Ponniah Indian J Pharmacol Research Article AIM: Dechallenge is a response observed for the reduction or disappearance of adverse drug reactions (ADR) on withdrawal of a drug from a patient. Currently available algorithms to detect dechallenge have limitations. Hence, there is a need to compare available new methods. To detect dechallenge in Spontaneous Reporting Systems, data-mining algorithms like Naive Bayes and Improved Naive Bayes were applied for comparing the performance of the algorithms in terms of accuracy and error. Analyzing the factors of dechallenge like outcome and disease category will help medical practitioners and pharmaceutical industries to determine the reasons for dechallenge in order to take essential steps toward drug safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adverse drug reactions of the year 2011 and 2012 were downloaded from the United States Food and Drug Administration's database. RESULTS: The outcome of classification algorithms showed that Improved Naive Bayes algorithm outperformed Naive Bayes with accuracy of 90.11% and error of 9.8% in detecting the dechallenge. CONCLUSION: Detecting dechallenge for unknown samples are essential for proper prescription. To overcome the issues exposed by Naive Bayes algorithm, Improved Naive Bayes algorithm can be used to detect dechallenge in terms of higher accuracy and minimal error. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4071703/ /pubmed/24987173 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.132157 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Banu, A. Bazila Alias Balamurugan, S. Appavu Thirumalaikolundusubramanian, Ponniah Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods |
title | Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods |
title_full | Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods |
title_fullStr | Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods |
title_short | Detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: A comparison of Bayes methods |
title_sort | detection of dechallenge in spontaneous reporting systems: a comparison of bayes methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4071703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987173 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.132157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banuabazila detectionofdechallengeinspontaneousreportingsystemsacomparisonofbayesmethods AT aliasbalamurugansappavu detectionofdechallengeinspontaneousreportingsystemsacomparisonofbayesmethods AT thirumalaikolundusubramanianponniah detectionofdechallengeinspontaneousreportingsystemsacomparisonofbayesmethods |