Cargando…

Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations

OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra, da SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo, ELIAS, Carlos Nelson, VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130665
_version_ 1782322931308691456
author MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
da SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo
ELIAS, Carlos Nelson
VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
author_facet MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
da SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo
ELIAS, Carlos Nelson
VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
author_sort MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. RESULTS: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. CONCLUSION: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4072274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40722742014-06-27 Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra da SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo ELIAS, Carlos Nelson VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement. RESULTS: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials. CONCLUSION: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4072274/ /pubmed/25025564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130665 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
MONTEIRO, Maria Regina Guerra
da SILVA, Licinio Esmeraldo
ELIAS, Carlos Nelson
VILELLA, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_full Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_fullStr Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_full_unstemmed Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_short Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
title_sort frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130665
work_keys_str_mv AT monteiromariareginaguerra frictionalresistanceofselfligatingversusconventionalbracketsindifferentbracketarchwireanglecombinations
AT dasilvalicinioesmeraldo frictionalresistanceofselfligatingversusconventionalbracketsindifferentbracketarchwireanglecombinations
AT eliascarlosnelson frictionalresistanceofselfligatingversusconventionalbracketsindifferentbracketarchwireanglecombinations
AT vilellaoswaldodevasconcellos frictionalresistanceofselfligatingversusconventionalbracketsindifferentbracketarchwireanglecombinations