Cargando…

En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion

In the present report, two techniques of space closure; two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) and en masse retraction (ER) were used in two adult patients who had bimaxillary protrusion and were treated with four premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Both patients had a Cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Felemban, Nayef H., Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F., Murshid, Zuhair A., Hassan, Ali H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.110330
_version_ 1782322948792647680
author Felemban, Nayef H.
Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F.
Murshid, Zuhair A.
Hassan, Ali H.
author_facet Felemban, Nayef H.
Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F.
Murshid, Zuhair A.
Hassan, Ali H.
author_sort Felemban, Nayef H.
collection PubMed
description In the present report, two techniques of space closure; two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) and en masse retraction (ER) were used in two adult patients who had bimaxillary protrusion and were treated with four premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Both patients had a Class I dental malocclusion and the same chief complaint, which is protrusive lips. Anterior teeth were retracted by two-step retraction; canine sliding followed by retraction of incisors with T-loop archwire in the first patient and by en masse retraction using Beta titanium alloy T-loop archwire in the second case. At the end of treatment, good balance and harmony of lips was achieved with maintenance of Class I relationships. The outcome of treatment was similar in the two patients with similar anchorage control. ER can be an acceptable alternative to the TSR during space closure since it is esthetically more acceptable. However, it requires accurate bending and positioning of the T-loop.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4072371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40723712014-07-01 En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion Felemban, Nayef H. Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F. Murshid, Zuhair A. Hassan, Ali H. J Orthod Sci Case Report In the present report, two techniques of space closure; two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) and en masse retraction (ER) were used in two adult patients who had bimaxillary protrusion and were treated with four premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Both patients had a Class I dental malocclusion and the same chief complaint, which is protrusive lips. Anterior teeth were retracted by two-step retraction; canine sliding followed by retraction of incisors with T-loop archwire in the first patient and by en masse retraction using Beta titanium alloy T-loop archwire in the second case. At the end of treatment, good balance and harmony of lips was achieved with maintenance of Class I relationships. The outcome of treatment was similar in the two patients with similar anchorage control. ER can be an acceptable alternative to the TSR during space closure since it is esthetically more acceptable. However, it requires accurate bending and positioning of the T-loop. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4072371/ /pubmed/24987640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.110330 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Felemban, Nayef H.
Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F.
Murshid, Zuhair A.
Hassan, Ali H.
En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
title En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
title_full En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
title_fullStr En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
title_full_unstemmed En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
title_short En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
title_sort en masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.110330
work_keys_str_mv AT felembannayefh enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion
AT alsulaimanifahadf enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion
AT murshidzuhaira enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion
AT hassanalih enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion