Cargando…
En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion
In the present report, two techniques of space closure; two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) and en masse retraction (ER) were used in two adult patients who had bimaxillary protrusion and were treated with four premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Both patients had a Cl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.110330 |
_version_ | 1782322948792647680 |
---|---|
author | Felemban, Nayef H. Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F. Murshid, Zuhair A. Hassan, Ali H. |
author_facet | Felemban, Nayef H. Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F. Murshid, Zuhair A. Hassan, Ali H. |
author_sort | Felemban, Nayef H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present report, two techniques of space closure; two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) and en masse retraction (ER) were used in two adult patients who had bimaxillary protrusion and were treated with four premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Both patients had a Class I dental malocclusion and the same chief complaint, which is protrusive lips. Anterior teeth were retracted by two-step retraction; canine sliding followed by retraction of incisors with T-loop archwire in the first patient and by en masse retraction using Beta titanium alloy T-loop archwire in the second case. At the end of treatment, good balance and harmony of lips was achieved with maintenance of Class I relationships. The outcome of treatment was similar in the two patients with similar anchorage control. ER can be an acceptable alternative to the TSR during space closure since it is esthetically more acceptable. However, it requires accurate bending and positioning of the T-loop. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4072371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40723712014-07-01 En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion Felemban, Nayef H. Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F. Murshid, Zuhair A. Hassan, Ali H. J Orthod Sci Case Report In the present report, two techniques of space closure; two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) and en masse retraction (ER) were used in two adult patients who had bimaxillary protrusion and were treated with four premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Both patients had a Class I dental malocclusion and the same chief complaint, which is protrusive lips. Anterior teeth were retracted by two-step retraction; canine sliding followed by retraction of incisors with T-loop archwire in the first patient and by en masse retraction using Beta titanium alloy T-loop archwire in the second case. At the end of treatment, good balance and harmony of lips was achieved with maintenance of Class I relationships. The outcome of treatment was similar in the two patients with similar anchorage control. ER can be an acceptable alternative to the TSR during space closure since it is esthetically more acceptable. However, it requires accurate bending and positioning of the T-loop. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4072371/ /pubmed/24987640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.110330 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Felemban, Nayef H. Al-Sulaimani, Fahad F. Murshid, Zuhair A. Hassan, Ali H. En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion |
title | En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion |
title_full | En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion |
title_fullStr | En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion |
title_full_unstemmed | En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion |
title_short | En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion |
title_sort | en masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.110330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT felembannayefh enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion AT alsulaimanifahadf enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion AT murshidzuhaira enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion AT hassanalih enmasseretractionversustwostepretractionofanteriorteethinextractiontreatmentofbimaxillaryprotrusion |