Cargando…

Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND: Delayed access to antenatal care ('late booking’) has been linked to increased maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand why some women are late to access antenatal care. METHODS: 27 women presenting after 19 completed weeks gest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddrill, Rosalind, Jones, Georgina L, Mitchell, Caroline A, Anumba, Dilly OC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24935100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-207
_version_ 1782322969100419072
author Haddrill, Rosalind
Jones, Georgina L
Mitchell, Caroline A
Anumba, Dilly OC
author_facet Haddrill, Rosalind
Jones, Georgina L
Mitchell, Caroline A
Anumba, Dilly OC
author_sort Haddrill, Rosalind
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delayed access to antenatal care ('late booking’) has been linked to increased maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand why some women are late to access antenatal care. METHODS: 27 women presenting after 19 completed weeks gestation for their first hospital booking appointment were interviewed, using a semi-structured format, in community and maternity hospital settings in South Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and entered onto NVivo 8 software. An interdisciplinary, iterative, thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: The late booking women were diverse in terms of: age (15–37 years); parity (0–4); socioeconomic status; educational attainment and ethnicity. Three key themes relating to late booking were identified from our data: 1) 'not knowing’: realisation (absence of classic symptoms, misinterpretation); belief (age, subfertility, using contraception, lay hindrance); 2) 'knowing’: avoidance (ambivalence, fear, self-care); postponement (fear, location, not valuing care, self-care); and 3) 'delayed’ (professional and system failures, knowledge/empowerment issues). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst vulnerable groups are strongly represented in this study, women do not always fit a socio-cultural stereotype of a 'late booker’. We report a new taxonomy of more complex reasons for late antenatal booking than the prevalent concepts of denial, concealment and disadvantage. Explanatory sub-themes are also discussed, which relate to psychological, empowerment and socio-cultural factors. These include poor reproductive health knowledge and delayed recognition of pregnancy, the influence of a pregnancy 'mindset’ and previous pregnancy experience, and the perceived value of antenatal care. The study also highlights deficiencies in early pregnancy diagnosis and service organisation. These issues should be considered by practitioners and service commissioners in order to promote timely antenatal care for all women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4072485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40724852014-06-27 Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study Haddrill, Rosalind Jones, Georgina L Mitchell, Caroline A Anumba, Dilly OC BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Delayed access to antenatal care ('late booking’) has been linked to increased maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand why some women are late to access antenatal care. METHODS: 27 women presenting after 19 completed weeks gestation for their first hospital booking appointment were interviewed, using a semi-structured format, in community and maternity hospital settings in South Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and entered onto NVivo 8 software. An interdisciplinary, iterative, thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: The late booking women were diverse in terms of: age (15–37 years); parity (0–4); socioeconomic status; educational attainment and ethnicity. Three key themes relating to late booking were identified from our data: 1) 'not knowing’: realisation (absence of classic symptoms, misinterpretation); belief (age, subfertility, using contraception, lay hindrance); 2) 'knowing’: avoidance (ambivalence, fear, self-care); postponement (fear, location, not valuing care, self-care); and 3) 'delayed’ (professional and system failures, knowledge/empowerment issues). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst vulnerable groups are strongly represented in this study, women do not always fit a socio-cultural stereotype of a 'late booker’. We report a new taxonomy of more complex reasons for late antenatal booking than the prevalent concepts of denial, concealment and disadvantage. Explanatory sub-themes are also discussed, which relate to psychological, empowerment and socio-cultural factors. These include poor reproductive health knowledge and delayed recognition of pregnancy, the influence of a pregnancy 'mindset’ and previous pregnancy experience, and the perceived value of antenatal care. The study also highlights deficiencies in early pregnancy diagnosis and service organisation. These issues should be considered by practitioners and service commissioners in order to promote timely antenatal care for all women. BioMed Central 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4072485/ /pubmed/24935100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-207 Text en Copyright © 2014 Haddrill et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haddrill, Rosalind
Jones, Georgina L
Mitchell, Caroline A
Anumba, Dilly OC
Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study
title Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study
title_full Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study
title_short Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study
title_sort understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24935100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-207
work_keys_str_mv AT haddrillrosalind understandingdelayedaccesstoantenatalcareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT jonesgeorginal understandingdelayedaccesstoantenatalcareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT mitchellcarolinea understandingdelayedaccesstoantenatalcareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT anumbadillyoc understandingdelayedaccesstoantenatalcareaqualitativeinterviewstudy