Cargando…

Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Recently, more and more studies investigated the association of inflammation parameters such as the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and the prognosis of various cancers. However, the prognostic role of PLR in cancer remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of publishe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Xin, Du, Yiping, Huang, Zebo, Xu, Jun, Qiu, Tianzhu, Wang, Jian, Wang, Tongshan, Zhu, Wei, Liu, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24968121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101119
_version_ 1782323013808553984
author Zhou, Xin
Du, Yiping
Huang, Zebo
Xu, Jun
Qiu, Tianzhu
Wang, Jian
Wang, Tongshan
Zhu, Wei
Liu, Ping
author_facet Zhou, Xin
Du, Yiping
Huang, Zebo
Xu, Jun
Qiu, Tianzhu
Wang, Jian
Wang, Tongshan
Zhu, Wei
Liu, Ping
author_sort Zhou, Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, more and more studies investigated the association of inflammation parameters such as the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and the prognosis of various cancers. However, the prognostic role of PLR in cancer remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the prognostic value of PLR in various cancers. In order to investigate the association between PLR and overall survival (OS), the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 13964 patients from 26 studies were included in the analysis. The summary results showed that elevated PLR was a negative predictor for OS with HR of 1.60 (95%CI: 1.35–1.90; P(heterogeneity) <0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that increased PLR was a negative prognostic marker in patients with gastric cancer (HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 0.80–2.25, P(heterogeneity) = 0.011), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.33–2.05, P(heterogeneity) = 0.995), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 3.07, 95% CI: 2.04–4.62, P(heterogeneity) = 0.133), ovarian cancer (HR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.07–2.31, P(heterogeneity) = 0.641) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.42–2.41, P(heterogeneity) = 0.451) except for pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.92–1.09, P(heterogeneity) = 0.388). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis demonstrated that PLR could act as a significant biomarker in the prognosis of various cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4072728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40727282014-07-02 Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis Zhou, Xin Du, Yiping Huang, Zebo Xu, Jun Qiu, Tianzhu Wang, Jian Wang, Tongshan Zhu, Wei Liu, Ping PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently, more and more studies investigated the association of inflammation parameters such as the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and the prognosis of various cancers. However, the prognostic role of PLR in cancer remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the prognostic value of PLR in various cancers. In order to investigate the association between PLR and overall survival (OS), the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 13964 patients from 26 studies were included in the analysis. The summary results showed that elevated PLR was a negative predictor for OS with HR of 1.60 (95%CI: 1.35–1.90; P(heterogeneity) <0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that increased PLR was a negative prognostic marker in patients with gastric cancer (HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 0.80–2.25, P(heterogeneity) = 0.011), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.33–2.05, P(heterogeneity) = 0.995), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 3.07, 95% CI: 2.04–4.62, P(heterogeneity) = 0.133), ovarian cancer (HR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.07–2.31, P(heterogeneity) = 0.641) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.42–2.41, P(heterogeneity) = 0.451) except for pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.92–1.09, P(heterogeneity) = 0.388). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis demonstrated that PLR could act as a significant biomarker in the prognosis of various cancers. Public Library of Science 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4072728/ /pubmed/24968121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101119 Text en © 2014 Zhou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Xin
Du, Yiping
Huang, Zebo
Xu, Jun
Qiu, Tianzhu
Wang, Jian
Wang, Tongshan
Zhu, Wei
Liu, Ping
Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Prognostic Value of PLR in Various Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort prognostic value of plr in various cancers: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4072728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24968121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101119
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouxin prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT duyiping prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT huangzebo prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT xujun prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT qiutianzhu prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT wangjian prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT wangtongshan prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT zhuwei prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis
AT liuping prognosticvalueofplrinvariouscancersametaanalysis