Cargando…

Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare outcome of patients with previous cardiac surgery undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (Redo-TAVI) to those undergoing classic aortic valve replacement (Redo-AVR) by using propensity analysis. METHODS: From January 2005 through May 2012, 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papadopoulos, Nestoras, Schiller, Nina, Fichtlscherer, Stephan, Lehmann, Ralf, Weber, Christian F, Moritz, Anton, Doss, Mirko, Zierer, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-99
_version_ 1782323123014598656
author Papadopoulos, Nestoras
Schiller, Nina
Fichtlscherer, Stephan
Lehmann, Ralf
Weber, Christian F
Moritz, Anton
Doss, Mirko
Zierer, Andreas
author_facet Papadopoulos, Nestoras
Schiller, Nina
Fichtlscherer, Stephan
Lehmann, Ralf
Weber, Christian F
Moritz, Anton
Doss, Mirko
Zierer, Andreas
author_sort Papadopoulos, Nestoras
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare outcome of patients with previous cardiac surgery undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (Redo-TAVI) to those undergoing classic aortic valve replacement (Redo-AVR) by using propensity analysis. METHODS: From January 2005 through May 2012, 52 high-risk patients underwent Redo-TAVI using a pericardial xenograft fixed within a stainless steel, balloon-expandable stent (Edwards SAPIEN™). During the same period of time 167 patients underwent classic Redo-AVR. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify covariates among 11 baseline patient variables including the type of initial surgery. Using the significant regression coefficients, each patient’s propensity score was calculated, allowing selectively matched subgroups of 40 patients each. Initial surgery included coronary artery bypass grafting in 30 patients, aortic valve replacement in 7 patients and mitral valve reconstruction in 3 patients in each group. Follow-up was 4 ± 2 years and was 100% complete. RESULTS: Postoperative chest tube drainage (163 ± 214 vs. 562 ± 332 ml/24 h, p = 0.02) and incidence of early permanent neurologic deficit (0 vs. 13%, p = 0.04) was lower in patients with Redo-TAVI and there was a trend towards improved 30-day survival (p = 0.06). Also we detected a decreased ventilation time (p = 0.04) and lower transfusion rate of allogenic blood products (p ≤ 0.05) in the Redo-TAVI group. At late follow up differences regarding incidence of major adverse events, including death and permanent neurologic deficits (25% vs. 43%, p = 0.01) statistically supported early postoperative findings. CONCLUSION: The encouraging results regarding early and long-term outcomes following TAVI in patients with previous cardiac surgery show, that this evolving approach may be particularly beneficial in this patient cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4073508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40735082014-06-28 Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery Papadopoulos, Nestoras Schiller, Nina Fichtlscherer, Stephan Lehmann, Ralf Weber, Christian F Moritz, Anton Doss, Mirko Zierer, Andreas J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare outcome of patients with previous cardiac surgery undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (Redo-TAVI) to those undergoing classic aortic valve replacement (Redo-AVR) by using propensity analysis. METHODS: From January 2005 through May 2012, 52 high-risk patients underwent Redo-TAVI using a pericardial xenograft fixed within a stainless steel, balloon-expandable stent (Edwards SAPIEN™). During the same period of time 167 patients underwent classic Redo-AVR. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify covariates among 11 baseline patient variables including the type of initial surgery. Using the significant regression coefficients, each patient’s propensity score was calculated, allowing selectively matched subgroups of 40 patients each. Initial surgery included coronary artery bypass grafting in 30 patients, aortic valve replacement in 7 patients and mitral valve reconstruction in 3 patients in each group. Follow-up was 4 ± 2 years and was 100% complete. RESULTS: Postoperative chest tube drainage (163 ± 214 vs. 562 ± 332 ml/24 h, p = 0.02) and incidence of early permanent neurologic deficit (0 vs. 13%, p = 0.04) was lower in patients with Redo-TAVI and there was a trend towards improved 30-day survival (p = 0.06). Also we detected a decreased ventilation time (p = 0.04) and lower transfusion rate of allogenic blood products (p ≤ 0.05) in the Redo-TAVI group. At late follow up differences regarding incidence of major adverse events, including death and permanent neurologic deficits (25% vs. 43%, p = 0.01) statistically supported early postoperative findings. CONCLUSION: The encouraging results regarding early and long-term outcomes following TAVI in patients with previous cardiac surgery show, that this evolving approach may be particularly beneficial in this patient cohort. BioMed Central 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4073508/ /pubmed/24915763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-99 Text en Copyright © 2014 Papadopoulos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Papadopoulos, Nestoras
Schiller, Nina
Fichtlscherer, Stephan
Lehmann, Ralf
Weber, Christian F
Moritz, Anton
Doss, Mirko
Zierer, Andreas
Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
title Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
title_full Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
title_fullStr Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
title_short Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
title_sort propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-99
work_keys_str_mv AT papadopoulosnestoras propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery
AT schillernina propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery
AT fichtlschererstephan propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery
AT lehmannralf propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery
AT weberchristianf propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery
AT moritzanton propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery
AT dossmirko propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery
AT ziererandreas propensitymatchedanalysisoflongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscatheterbasedaorticvalveimplantationversusclassicaorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithpreviouscardiacsurgery