Cargando…
Analysis of data query as parameter of quality
INTRODUCTION: Data query (DQ) rate per case record form (CRF) page is an index of quality of clinical trial data, which can be affected by the phase of clinical trial, the therapeutic area, and the country, where investigator site is located. OBJECTIVE: To compare DQ rate per page by countries, phas...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987582 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.134312 |
_version_ | 1782323128948490240 |
---|---|
author | Khatawkar, Sonia Bhatt, Arun Shetty, Rutika Dsilva, Patricia |
author_facet | Khatawkar, Sonia Bhatt, Arun Shetty, Rutika Dsilva, Patricia |
author_sort | Khatawkar, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Data query (DQ) rate per case record form (CRF) page is an index of quality of clinical trial data, which can be affected by the phase of clinical trial, the therapeutic area, and the country, where investigator site is located. OBJECTIVE: To compare DQ rate per page by countries, phases, and therapeutic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 19 paper CRF clinical trials conducted at 352 sites, in 5,610 patients were entered into clinical data management system by double data entry method, and DQs were generated. The DQ rate per page was compared for the phase, therapeutic area, and the country, by parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric test-Kruskal-Wallis and median test. Multiple comparisons test was conducted for each category using Tukey's Studentized Range Test. RESULTS: The total number of DQs from 108,599 CRF pages was 33,177 (0.306/CRF page). The studies included 12 countries, all phases, and seven therapeutic areas. Comparison of DQ rate per page showed a significant difference between phases, countries, and therapeutic areas. However, multiple comparisons showed that the DQ rate per page was significantly different between Phase I and other phases, and oncology, cardiology, endocrinology, and dermatology. The DQ categories were: Missing 21.8%, confirmatory 50.1%, and clarification 28.2%. The most common DQs by CRF field were: Lab data (23.2%), physical examination (17.4%), study assessment (17.4), and concomitant medication (12%). There was no correlation between the number of CRF pages and DQ rate per page per study. CONCLUSION: The phase of study and therapeutic area could impact the data quality as measured by DQ rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4073548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40735482014-07-02 Analysis of data query as parameter of quality Khatawkar, Sonia Bhatt, Arun Shetty, Rutika Dsilva, Patricia Perspect Clin Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Data query (DQ) rate per case record form (CRF) page is an index of quality of clinical trial data, which can be affected by the phase of clinical trial, the therapeutic area, and the country, where investigator site is located. OBJECTIVE: To compare DQ rate per page by countries, phases, and therapeutic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 19 paper CRF clinical trials conducted at 352 sites, in 5,610 patients were entered into clinical data management system by double data entry method, and DQs were generated. The DQ rate per page was compared for the phase, therapeutic area, and the country, by parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric test-Kruskal-Wallis and median test. Multiple comparisons test was conducted for each category using Tukey's Studentized Range Test. RESULTS: The total number of DQs from 108,599 CRF pages was 33,177 (0.306/CRF page). The studies included 12 countries, all phases, and seven therapeutic areas. Comparison of DQ rate per page showed a significant difference between phases, countries, and therapeutic areas. However, multiple comparisons showed that the DQ rate per page was significantly different between Phase I and other phases, and oncology, cardiology, endocrinology, and dermatology. The DQ categories were: Missing 21.8%, confirmatory 50.1%, and clarification 28.2%. The most common DQs by CRF field were: Lab data (23.2%), physical examination (17.4%), study assessment (17.4), and concomitant medication (12%). There was no correlation between the number of CRF pages and DQ rate per page per study. CONCLUSION: The phase of study and therapeutic area could impact the data quality as measured by DQ rates. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4073548/ /pubmed/24987582 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.134312 Text en Copyright: © Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khatawkar, Sonia Bhatt, Arun Shetty, Rutika Dsilva, Patricia Analysis of data query as parameter of quality |
title | Analysis of data query as parameter of quality |
title_full | Analysis of data query as parameter of quality |
title_fullStr | Analysis of data query as parameter of quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of data query as parameter of quality |
title_short | Analysis of data query as parameter of quality |
title_sort | analysis of data query as parameter of quality |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987582 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.134312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khatawkarsonia analysisofdataqueryasparameterofquality AT bhattarun analysisofdataqueryasparameterofquality AT shettyrutika analysisofdataqueryasparameterofquality AT dsilvapatricia analysisofdataqueryasparameterofquality |