Cargando…
Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals
BACKGROUND: Manuscript authors of scientific journals are expected to report if their studies were conducted according to international and national ethical guidelines and inform readers regarding ethics approval and informed consent obtained from participants and/or their legally acceptable represe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987584 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.134316 |
_version_ | 1782323129415106560 |
---|---|
author | Belhekar, Mahesh N Bhalerao, Supriya S Munshi, Renuka P |
author_facet | Belhekar, Mahesh N Bhalerao, Supriya S Munshi, Renuka P |
author_sort | Belhekar, Mahesh N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Manuscript authors of scientific journals are expected to report if their studies were conducted according to international and national ethical guidelines and inform readers regarding ethics approval and informed consent obtained from participants and/or their legally acceptable representative/s. In the present study we assessed the reporting practices of ethics approval and informed consent (assent in case of pediatric studies) in four Indian journals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original research articles published over a period of 4 years (2009-2012) in four major national clinical journals, viz. Journal of Association of Physicians of India (JAPI), Indian Journal of Surgery (IJS), Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI), and Indian Journal of Orthopedics (IJO) were reviewed with regard to documentation of ethics approval and written informed consent and assent in case of pediatric participants. RESULTS: We reviewed 673 research articles and found that, overall ethical approval was mentioned in 163 (24.2%) and informed consent or assent was mentioned in 179 (26.5%) articles in all four journals. Individually we found, in JAPI of the 174 manuscripts reviewed, 74 (42.5%) reported having obtained approval from the ethics committee and 68 (39.1%) reported taking written informed consent from participants. In IJS of 123 manuscripts, 18 (14.6%) reported ethics committee approval and 20 (16.2%) reported informed consent from participants. In JOGI of 152 manuscripts, 21 (13.8%) reported ethics committee approval while 49 (32.2%) reported informed consent from participants. In IJO, of 224 manuscripts, 50 (22.3%) reported ethics committee approval and 42 (18.7%) reported obtaining informed consent. CONCLUSION: Majority of the publications did not provide information regarding compliance to ethical guidelines in spite of the availability of various guidelines. Thus, there is a need for awareness and training on bioethics for authors, reviewers, and editors of biomedical journals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4073550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40735502014-07-02 Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals Belhekar, Mahesh N Bhalerao, Supriya S Munshi, Renuka P Perspect Clin Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Manuscript authors of scientific journals are expected to report if their studies were conducted according to international and national ethical guidelines and inform readers regarding ethics approval and informed consent obtained from participants and/or their legally acceptable representative/s. In the present study we assessed the reporting practices of ethics approval and informed consent (assent in case of pediatric studies) in four Indian journals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original research articles published over a period of 4 years (2009-2012) in four major national clinical journals, viz. Journal of Association of Physicians of India (JAPI), Indian Journal of Surgery (IJS), Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI), and Indian Journal of Orthopedics (IJO) were reviewed with regard to documentation of ethics approval and written informed consent and assent in case of pediatric participants. RESULTS: We reviewed 673 research articles and found that, overall ethical approval was mentioned in 163 (24.2%) and informed consent or assent was mentioned in 179 (26.5%) articles in all four journals. Individually we found, in JAPI of the 174 manuscripts reviewed, 74 (42.5%) reported having obtained approval from the ethics committee and 68 (39.1%) reported taking written informed consent from participants. In IJS of 123 manuscripts, 18 (14.6%) reported ethics committee approval and 20 (16.2%) reported informed consent from participants. In JOGI of 152 manuscripts, 21 (13.8%) reported ethics committee approval while 49 (32.2%) reported informed consent from participants. In IJO, of 224 manuscripts, 50 (22.3%) reported ethics committee approval and 42 (18.7%) reported obtaining informed consent. CONCLUSION: Majority of the publications did not provide information regarding compliance to ethical guidelines in spite of the availability of various guidelines. Thus, there is a need for awareness and training on bioethics for authors, reviewers, and editors of biomedical journals. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4073550/ /pubmed/24987584 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.134316 Text en Copyright: © Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Belhekar, Mahesh N Bhalerao, Supriya S Munshi, Renuka P Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals |
title | Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals |
title_full | Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals |
title_fullStr | Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals |
title_short | Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals |
title_sort | ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: a review of four indian journals |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987584 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.134316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belhekarmaheshn ethicsreportingpracticesinclinicalresearchpublicationsareviewoffourindianjournals AT bhaleraosupriyas ethicsreportingpracticesinclinicalresearchpublicationsareviewoffourindianjournals AT munshirenukap ethicsreportingpracticesinclinicalresearchpublicationsareviewoffourindianjournals |