Cargando…

Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure with large symptomatic potential in treatment of women with uterine leiomyomas. Due to specificities of this method and possible complications the appropriate indication is crucial. Patient’ symptoms, age, plans for pregnancy, and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mara, Michal, Kubinova, Kristyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018653
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S43591
_version_ 1782323163743387648
author Mara, Michal
Kubinova, Kristyna
author_facet Mara, Michal
Kubinova, Kristyna
author_sort Mara, Michal
collection PubMed
description Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure with large symptomatic potential in treatment of women with uterine leiomyomas. Due to specificities of this method and possible complications the appropriate indication is crucial. Patient’ symptoms, age, plans for pregnancy, and surgical and reproductive history play a major role in decision-making regarding appropriate subjects for UAE. Close cooperation between the gynecologist and the interventional radiologist is necessary. UAE is usually offered as an alternative to surgical treatment. In patients with no fertility plans, it is a less invasive option than abdominal hysterectomy, with a comparable effect on fibroid-related symptoms and quality of life. The need for reintervention is markedly greater in patients after UAE (up to 35% within 5 years) than after hysterectomy. Women with large symptomatic fibroids wishing to retain the uterus and ineligible for minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy are good candidates for UAE. However, studies comparing UAE with minimally invasive hysterectomy are lacking. Use of UAE in younger women desiring pregnancy is more controversial, mainly because of the significant risk of miscarriage (as high as 64% in some studies) as well as the increased risk of other complications of pregnancy, such as preterm delivery, abnormal placentation, and post-partum hemorrhage. The risk of infertility or subfertility following UAE is unknown. Even poor candidates for myomectomy should be carefully selected for UAE after counseling about all possible adverse effects on fertility. Good prospective studies focused on fertility comparing UAE with no treatment or with myomectomy are needed but would be ethically questionable. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the benefits and potential risks of UAE from the point of view of the gynecologist, who should be responsible for proper indication of this treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4074023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40740232014-07-11 Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons Mara, Michal Kubinova, Kristyna Int J Womens Health Review Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure with large symptomatic potential in treatment of women with uterine leiomyomas. Due to specificities of this method and possible complications the appropriate indication is crucial. Patient’ symptoms, age, plans for pregnancy, and surgical and reproductive history play a major role in decision-making regarding appropriate subjects for UAE. Close cooperation between the gynecologist and the interventional radiologist is necessary. UAE is usually offered as an alternative to surgical treatment. In patients with no fertility plans, it is a less invasive option than abdominal hysterectomy, with a comparable effect on fibroid-related symptoms and quality of life. The need for reintervention is markedly greater in patients after UAE (up to 35% within 5 years) than after hysterectomy. Women with large symptomatic fibroids wishing to retain the uterus and ineligible for minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy are good candidates for UAE. However, studies comparing UAE with minimally invasive hysterectomy are lacking. Use of UAE in younger women desiring pregnancy is more controversial, mainly because of the significant risk of miscarriage (as high as 64% in some studies) as well as the increased risk of other complications of pregnancy, such as preterm delivery, abnormal placentation, and post-partum hemorrhage. The risk of infertility or subfertility following UAE is unknown. Even poor candidates for myomectomy should be carefully selected for UAE after counseling about all possible adverse effects on fertility. Good prospective studies focused on fertility comparing UAE with no treatment or with myomectomy are needed but would be ethically questionable. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the benefits and potential risks of UAE from the point of view of the gynecologist, who should be responsible for proper indication of this treatment. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4074023/ /pubmed/25018653 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S43591 Text en © 2014 Mara and Kubinova. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Mara, Michal
Kubinova, Kristyna
Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
title Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
title_full Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
title_fullStr Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
title_full_unstemmed Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
title_short Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
title_sort embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018653
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S43591
work_keys_str_mv AT maramichal embolizationofuterinefibroidsfromthepointofviewofthegynecologistprosandcons
AT kubinovakristyna embolizationofuterinefibroidsfromthepointofviewofthegynecologistprosandcons