Cargando…

Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation

BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary teamwork (ITW) is designed to promote the active participation of several disciplines in delivering comprehensive cancer care to patients. ITW provides mechanisms to support continuous communication among care providers, optimize professionals’ participation in clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tremblay, Dominique, Touati, Nassera, Roberge, Danièle, Denis, Jean-Louis, Turcotte, Annie, Samson, Benoît
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24938443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-76
_version_ 1782323204397727744
author Tremblay, Dominique
Touati, Nassera
Roberge, Danièle
Denis, Jean-Louis
Turcotte, Annie
Samson, Benoît
author_facet Tremblay, Dominique
Touati, Nassera
Roberge, Danièle
Denis, Jean-Louis
Turcotte, Annie
Samson, Benoît
author_sort Tremblay, Dominique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary teamwork (ITW) is designed to promote the active participation of several disciplines in delivering comprehensive cancer care to patients. ITW provides mechanisms to support continuous communication among care providers, optimize professionals’ participation in clinical decision-making within and across disciplines, and foster care coordination along the cancer trajectory. However, ITW mechanisms are not activated optimally by all teams, resulting in a gap between desired outcomes of ITW and actual outcomes observed. The aim of the present study is to identify the conditions underlying outcome production by ITW in local oncology teams. METHODS: This retrospective multiple case study will draw upon realist evaluation principles to explore associations among context, mechanisms and outcomes (CMO). The cases are nine interdisciplinary cancer teams that participated in a previous study evaluating ITW outcomes. Qualitative data sources will be used to construct a picture of CMO associations in each case. For data collection, reflexive focus groups will be held to capture patients’ and professionals’ perspectives on ITW, using the guiding question, ‘What works, for whom, and under what circumstances?’ Intra-case analysis will be used to trace associations between context, ITW mechanisms, and patient outcomes. Inter-case analysis will be used to compare the different cases’ CMO associations for a better understanding of the phenomenon under study. DISCUSSION: This multiple case study will use realist evaluation principles to draw lessons about how certain contexts are more or less likely to produce particular outcomes. The results will make it possible to target more specifically the actions required to optimize structures and to activate the best mechanisms to meet the needs of cancer patients. This project could also contribute significantly to the development of improved research methods for conducting realist evaluations of complex healthcare interventions. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use CMO associations to improved empirical and theoretical understanding of interdisciplinary teamwork in oncology, and its results could foster more effective implementation in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4074333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40743332014-06-29 Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation Tremblay, Dominique Touati, Nassera Roberge, Danièle Denis, Jean-Louis Turcotte, Annie Samson, Benoît Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary teamwork (ITW) is designed to promote the active participation of several disciplines in delivering comprehensive cancer care to patients. ITW provides mechanisms to support continuous communication among care providers, optimize professionals’ participation in clinical decision-making within and across disciplines, and foster care coordination along the cancer trajectory. However, ITW mechanisms are not activated optimally by all teams, resulting in a gap between desired outcomes of ITW and actual outcomes observed. The aim of the present study is to identify the conditions underlying outcome production by ITW in local oncology teams. METHODS: This retrospective multiple case study will draw upon realist evaluation principles to explore associations among context, mechanisms and outcomes (CMO). The cases are nine interdisciplinary cancer teams that participated in a previous study evaluating ITW outcomes. Qualitative data sources will be used to construct a picture of CMO associations in each case. For data collection, reflexive focus groups will be held to capture patients’ and professionals’ perspectives on ITW, using the guiding question, ‘What works, for whom, and under what circumstances?’ Intra-case analysis will be used to trace associations between context, ITW mechanisms, and patient outcomes. Inter-case analysis will be used to compare the different cases’ CMO associations for a better understanding of the phenomenon under study. DISCUSSION: This multiple case study will use realist evaluation principles to draw lessons about how certain contexts are more or less likely to produce particular outcomes. The results will make it possible to target more specifically the actions required to optimize structures and to activate the best mechanisms to meet the needs of cancer patients. This project could also contribute significantly to the development of improved research methods for conducting realist evaluations of complex healthcare interventions. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use CMO associations to improved empirical and theoretical understanding of interdisciplinary teamwork in oncology, and its results could foster more effective implementation in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2014-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4074333/ /pubmed/24938443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-76 Text en Copyright © 2014 Tremblay et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Tremblay, Dominique
Touati, Nassera
Roberge, Danièle
Denis, Jean-Louis
Turcotte, Annie
Samson, Benoît
Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation
title Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation
title_full Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation
title_fullStr Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation
title_short Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation
title_sort conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24938443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-76
work_keys_str_mv AT tremblaydominique conditionsforproductionofinterdisciplinaryteamworkoutcomesinoncologyteamsprotocolforarealistevaluation
AT touatinassera conditionsforproductionofinterdisciplinaryteamworkoutcomesinoncologyteamsprotocolforarealistevaluation
AT robergedaniele conditionsforproductionofinterdisciplinaryteamworkoutcomesinoncologyteamsprotocolforarealistevaluation
AT denisjeanlouis conditionsforproductionofinterdisciplinaryteamworkoutcomesinoncologyteamsprotocolforarealistevaluation
AT turcotteannie conditionsforproductionofinterdisciplinaryteamworkoutcomesinoncologyteamsprotocolforarealistevaluation
AT samsonbenoit conditionsforproductionofinterdisciplinaryteamworkoutcomesinoncologyteamsprotocolforarealistevaluation