Cargando…
Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
BACKGROUND: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). METHODS: Data for this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-188 |
_version_ | 1782323204851761152 |
---|---|
author | Heaman, Maureen I Sword, Wendy A Akhtar-Danesh, Noori Bradford, Amanda Tough, Suzanne Janssen, Patricia A Young, David C Kingston, Dawn A Hutton, Eileen K Helewa, Michael E |
author_facet | Heaman, Maureen I Sword, Wendy A Akhtar-Danesh, Noori Bradford, Amanda Tough, Suzanne Janssen, Patricia A Young, David C Kingston, Dawn A Hutton, Eileen K Helewa, Michael E |
author_sort | Heaman, Maureen I |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). METHODS: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women’s ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the “Support and Respect” subscale of the QPCQ and the “Respectfulness/Emotional Support” subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women’s ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSION: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4074335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40743352014-06-29 Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing Heaman, Maureen I Sword, Wendy A Akhtar-Danesh, Noori Bradford, Amanda Tough, Suzanne Janssen, Patricia A Young, David C Kingston, Dawn A Hutton, Eileen K Helewa, Michael E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). METHODS: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women’s ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the “Support and Respect” subscale of the QPCQ and the “Respectfulness/Emotional Support” subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women’s ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSION: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes. BioMed Central 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4074335/ /pubmed/24894497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-188 Text en Copyright © 2014 Heaman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heaman, Maureen I Sword, Wendy A Akhtar-Danesh, Noori Bradford, Amanda Tough, Suzanne Janssen, Patricia A Young, David C Kingston, Dawn A Hutton, Eileen K Helewa, Michael E Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing |
title | Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing |
title_full | Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing |
title_fullStr | Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing |
title_short | Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing |
title_sort | quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heamanmaureeni qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT swordwendya qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT akhtardaneshnoori qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT bradfordamanda qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT toughsuzanne qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT janssenpatriciaa qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT youngdavidc qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT kingstondawna qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT huttoneileenk qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting AT helewamichaele qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting |