Cargando…

Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing

BACKGROUND: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). METHODS: Data for this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heaman, Maureen I, Sword, Wendy A, Akhtar-Danesh, Noori, Bradford, Amanda, Tough, Suzanne, Janssen, Patricia A, Young, David C, Kingston, Dawn A, Hutton, Eileen K, Helewa, Michael E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-188
_version_ 1782323204851761152
author Heaman, Maureen I
Sword, Wendy A
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
Bradford, Amanda
Tough, Suzanne
Janssen, Patricia A
Young, David C
Kingston, Dawn A
Hutton, Eileen K
Helewa, Michael E
author_facet Heaman, Maureen I
Sword, Wendy A
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
Bradford, Amanda
Tough, Suzanne
Janssen, Patricia A
Young, David C
Kingston, Dawn A
Hutton, Eileen K
Helewa, Michael E
author_sort Heaman, Maureen I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). METHODS: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women’s ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the “Support and Respect” subscale of the QPCQ and the “Respectfulness/Emotional Support” subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women’s ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSION: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4074335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40743352014-06-29 Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing Heaman, Maureen I Sword, Wendy A Akhtar-Danesh, Noori Bradford, Amanda Tough, Suzanne Janssen, Patricia A Young, David C Kingston, Dawn A Hutton, Eileen K Helewa, Michael E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). METHODS: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women’s ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the “Support and Respect” subscale of the QPCQ and the “Respectfulness/Emotional Support” subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women’s ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSION: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes. BioMed Central 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4074335/ /pubmed/24894497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-188 Text en Copyright © 2014 Heaman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heaman, Maureen I
Sword, Wendy A
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
Bradford, Amanda
Tough, Suzanne
Janssen, Patricia A
Young, David C
Kingston, Dawn A
Hutton, Eileen K
Helewa, Michael E
Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
title Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
title_full Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
title_fullStr Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
title_full_unstemmed Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
title_short Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
title_sort quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-188
work_keys_str_mv AT heamanmaureeni qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT swordwendya qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT akhtardaneshnoori qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT bradfordamanda qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT toughsuzanne qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT janssenpatriciaa qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT youngdavidc qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT kingstondawna qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT huttoneileenk qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting
AT helewamichaele qualityofprenatalcarequestionnaireinstrumentdevelopmentandtesting