Cargando…

What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU?

INTRODUCTION: To assess the feasibility of converting from 300IU to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients diagnosed with either idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) or neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective case–notes review of patients who were converted from 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malki, Manar, Mangera, Altaf, Reid, Sheilagh, Inman, Richard, Chapple, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24982778
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.01.art7
_version_ 1782323237856739328
author Malki, Manar
Mangera, Altaf
Reid, Sheilagh
Inman, Richard
Chapple, Christopher
author_facet Malki, Manar
Mangera, Altaf
Reid, Sheilagh
Inman, Richard
Chapple, Christopher
author_sort Malki, Manar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To assess the feasibility of converting from 300IU to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients diagnosed with either idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) or neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective case–notes review of patients who were converted from 300IU to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA. Subjective patient reported improvements at interview and bladder diary reported parameters of urgency, urgency incontinence, frequency and nocturia. RESULTS: Forty–four patients had received 300IU OnabotulinumtoxinA and were switched to 200IU after July 2008, 28 for IDO and 16 for NDO. Thirty–seven patients reported ongoing improvement with 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA, six patients had worsening in their symptoms since down–titrating to 200IU and one patient did not attend follow–up. Improvement in urgency and urgency incontinence episodes per day were 82% and 72%, respectively, in patients who received 200IU. Of the 44 patients, 39 continued to receive 200IU, four requested up–titration to 300IU (due to decreased effect) and one did not attend after the 1st treatment. After converting from 300IU to 200IU, additional three patients were started on CISC for de novo voiding difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy–nine percent of patients were satisfied with their symptoms after switching from 300IU to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA. Only 9% of patients (all with NDO) reverted back to receiving 300IU. This study showed similar efficacy and longevity in the majority of patients (90%) using 200IU in both NDO and IDO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4074718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40747182014-06-30 What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU? Malki, Manar Mangera, Altaf Reid, Sheilagh Inman, Richard Chapple, Christopher Cent European J Urol Research Paper INTRODUCTION: To assess the feasibility of converting from 300IU to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients diagnosed with either idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) or neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective case–notes review of patients who were converted from 300IU to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA. Subjective patient reported improvements at interview and bladder diary reported parameters of urgency, urgency incontinence, frequency and nocturia. RESULTS: Forty–four patients had received 300IU OnabotulinumtoxinA and were switched to 200IU after July 2008, 28 for IDO and 16 for NDO. Thirty–seven patients reported ongoing improvement with 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA, six patients had worsening in their symptoms since down–titrating to 200IU and one patient did not attend follow–up. Improvement in urgency and urgency incontinence episodes per day were 82% and 72%, respectively, in patients who received 200IU. Of the 44 patients, 39 continued to receive 200IU, four requested up–titration to 300IU (due to decreased effect) and one did not attend after the 1st treatment. After converting from 300IU to 200IU, additional three patients were started on CISC for de novo voiding difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy–nine percent of patients were satisfied with their symptoms after switching from 300IU to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA. Only 9% of patients (all with NDO) reverted back to receiving 300IU. This study showed similar efficacy and longevity in the majority of patients (90%) using 200IU in both NDO and IDO. Polish Urological Association 2014-04-17 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4074718/ /pubmed/24982778 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.01.art7 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Malki, Manar
Mangera, Altaf
Reid, Sheilagh
Inman, Richard
Chapple, Christopher
What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU?
title What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU?
title_full What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU?
title_fullStr What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU?
title_full_unstemmed What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU?
title_short What is the feasibility of switching to 200IU OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300IU?
title_sort what is the feasibility of switching to 200iu onabotulinumtoxina in patients with detrusor overactivity who have previously received 300iu?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24982778
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.01.art7
work_keys_str_mv AT malkimanar whatisthefeasibilityofswitchingto200iuonabotulinumtoxinainpatientswithdetrusoroveractivitywhohavepreviouslyreceived300iu
AT mangeraaltaf whatisthefeasibilityofswitchingto200iuonabotulinumtoxinainpatientswithdetrusoroveractivitywhohavepreviouslyreceived300iu
AT reidsheilagh whatisthefeasibilityofswitchingto200iuonabotulinumtoxinainpatientswithdetrusoroveractivitywhohavepreviouslyreceived300iu
AT inmanrichard whatisthefeasibilityofswitchingto200iuonabotulinumtoxinainpatientswithdetrusoroveractivitywhohavepreviouslyreceived300iu
AT chapplechristopher whatisthefeasibilityofswitchingto200iuonabotulinumtoxinainpatientswithdetrusoroveractivitywhohavepreviouslyreceived300iu