Cargando…
Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance
Aim. To investigate and compare the efficiency of two appliances for molar distalization: the bone-anchored distal screw (DS) and the traditional tooth-supported distal jet (DJ) for molar distalization and anchorage loss. Methods. Tests (18 subjects) were treated with a DS and controls (18 subjects)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/937059 |
_version_ | 1782323287892688896 |
---|---|
author | Cozzani, Mauro Pasini, Marco Zallio, Francesco Ritucci, Robert Mutinelli, Sabrina Mazzotta, Laura Giuca, Maria Rita Piras, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Cozzani, Mauro Pasini, Marco Zallio, Francesco Ritucci, Robert Mutinelli, Sabrina Mazzotta, Laura Giuca, Maria Rita Piras, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Cozzani, Mauro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim. To investigate and compare the efficiency of two appliances for molar distalization: the bone-anchored distal screw (DS) and the traditional tooth-supported distal jet (DJ) for molar distalization and anchorage loss. Methods. Tests (18 subjects) were treated with a DS and controls (18 subjects) were treated with a DJ. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before and at the end of molar distalization and were analysed. Shapiro Wilk test, unpaired t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were applied according to values distribution. The α level was fixed at 0.05. Results. Maxillary first molars were successfully distalized into a Class I relationship in all patients. The mean molar distalization and treatment time were similar in both groups. The DS group exhibited a spontaneous distalization (2.1 ± 0.9 mm) of the first premolar with control of anchorage loss, distal tipping, extrusion, and skeletal changes. Conclusions. The DS is an adequate compliance-free distalizing appliance that can be used safely for the correction of Class II malocclusions. In comparison to the traditional DJ, the DS enables not only a good rate of molar distalization, but also a spontaneous distalization of the first premolars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4075073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40750732014-07-13 Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance Cozzani, Mauro Pasini, Marco Zallio, Francesco Ritucci, Robert Mutinelli, Sabrina Mazzotta, Laura Giuca, Maria Rita Piras, Vincenzo Int J Dent Research Article Aim. To investigate and compare the efficiency of two appliances for molar distalization: the bone-anchored distal screw (DS) and the traditional tooth-supported distal jet (DJ) for molar distalization and anchorage loss. Methods. Tests (18 subjects) were treated with a DS and controls (18 subjects) were treated with a DJ. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before and at the end of molar distalization and were analysed. Shapiro Wilk test, unpaired t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were applied according to values distribution. The α level was fixed at 0.05. Results. Maxillary first molars were successfully distalized into a Class I relationship in all patients. The mean molar distalization and treatment time were similar in both groups. The DS group exhibited a spontaneous distalization (2.1 ± 0.9 mm) of the first premolar with control of anchorage loss, distal tipping, extrusion, and skeletal changes. Conclusions. The DS is an adequate compliance-free distalizing appliance that can be used safely for the correction of Class II malocclusions. In comparison to the traditional DJ, the DS enables not only a good rate of molar distalization, but also a spontaneous distalization of the first premolars. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4075073/ /pubmed/25018770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/937059 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mauro Cozzani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cozzani, Mauro Pasini, Marco Zallio, Francesco Ritucci, Robert Mutinelli, Sabrina Mazzotta, Laura Giuca, Maria Rita Piras, Vincenzo Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance |
title | Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance |
title_full | Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance |
title_short | Comparison of Maxillary Molar Distalization with an Implant-Supported Distal Jet and a Traditional Tooth-Supported Distal Jet Appliance |
title_sort | comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/937059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cozzanimauro comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance AT pasinimarco comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance AT zalliofrancesco comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance AT rituccirobert comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance AT mutinellisabrina comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance AT mazzottalaura comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance AT giucamariarita comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance AT pirasvincenzo comparisonofmaxillarymolardistalizationwithanimplantsupporteddistaljetandatraditionaltoothsupporteddistaljetappliance |