Cargando…

Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units

INTRODUCTION: Physical restraint (PR) use in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been associated with higher rates of self-extubation and prolonged ICU length of stay. Our objectives were to describe patterns and predictors of PR use. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective observa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luk, Elena, Sneyers, Barbara, Rose, Louise, Perreault, Marc M, Williamson, David R, Mehta, Sangeeta, Cook, Deborah J, Lapinsky, Stephanie C, Burry, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24661688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13789
_version_ 1782323294952751104
author Luk, Elena
Sneyers, Barbara
Rose, Louise
Perreault, Marc M
Williamson, David R
Mehta, Sangeeta
Cook, Deborah J
Lapinsky, Stephanie C
Burry, Lisa
author_facet Luk, Elena
Sneyers, Barbara
Rose, Louise
Perreault, Marc M
Williamson, David R
Mehta, Sangeeta
Cook, Deborah J
Lapinsky, Stephanie C
Burry, Lisa
author_sort Luk, Elena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Physical restraint (PR) use in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been associated with higher rates of self-extubation and prolonged ICU length of stay. Our objectives were to describe patterns and predictors of PR use. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study of analgosedation, antipsychotic, neuromuscular blocker, and PR practices in 51 Canadian ICUs. Data were collected prospectively for all mechanically ventilated adults admitted during a two-week period. We tested for patient, treatment, and hospital characteristics that were associated with PR use and number of days of use, using logistic and Poisson regression respectively. RESULTS: PR was used on 374 out of 711 (53%) patients, for a mean number of 4.1 (standard deviation (SD) 4.0) days. Treatment characteristics associated with PR were higher daily benzodiazepine dose (odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.11), higher daily opioid dose (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06), antipsychotic drugs (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.74 to 5.48), agitation (Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) >4) (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.50 to 9.29), and sedation administration method (continuous and bolus versus bolus only) (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.74 to 5.48). Hospital characteristics associated with PR indicated patients were less likely to be restrained in ICUs from university-affiliated hospitals (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.61). Mainly treatment characteristics were associated with more days of PR, including: higher daily benzodiazepine dose (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.13), daily sedation interruption (IRR 3.44, 95% CI 1.48 to 8.10), antipsychotic drugs (IRR 15.67, 95% CI 6.62 to 37.12), SAS <3 (IRR 2.62, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.35), and any adverse event including accidental device removal (IRR 8.27, 95% CI 2.07 to 33.08). Patient characteristics (age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, admission category, prior substance abuse, prior psychotropic medication, pre-existing psychiatric condition or dementia) were not associated with PR use or number of days used. CONCLUSIONS: PR was used in half of the patients in these 51 ICUs. Treatment characteristics predominantly predicted PR use, as opposed to patient or hospital/ICU characteristics. Use of sedative, analgesic, and antipsychotic drugs, agitation, heavy sedation, and occurrence of an adverse event predicted PR use or number of days used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4075126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40751262014-07-01 Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units Luk, Elena Sneyers, Barbara Rose, Louise Perreault, Marc M Williamson, David R Mehta, Sangeeta Cook, Deborah J Lapinsky, Stephanie C Burry, Lisa Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Physical restraint (PR) use in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been associated with higher rates of self-extubation and prolonged ICU length of stay. Our objectives were to describe patterns and predictors of PR use. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study of analgosedation, antipsychotic, neuromuscular blocker, and PR practices in 51 Canadian ICUs. Data were collected prospectively for all mechanically ventilated adults admitted during a two-week period. We tested for patient, treatment, and hospital characteristics that were associated with PR use and number of days of use, using logistic and Poisson regression respectively. RESULTS: PR was used on 374 out of 711 (53%) patients, for a mean number of 4.1 (standard deviation (SD) 4.0) days. Treatment characteristics associated with PR were higher daily benzodiazepine dose (odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.11), higher daily opioid dose (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06), antipsychotic drugs (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.74 to 5.48), agitation (Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) >4) (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.50 to 9.29), and sedation administration method (continuous and bolus versus bolus only) (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.74 to 5.48). Hospital characteristics associated with PR indicated patients were less likely to be restrained in ICUs from university-affiliated hospitals (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.61). Mainly treatment characteristics were associated with more days of PR, including: higher daily benzodiazepine dose (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.13), daily sedation interruption (IRR 3.44, 95% CI 1.48 to 8.10), antipsychotic drugs (IRR 15.67, 95% CI 6.62 to 37.12), SAS <3 (IRR 2.62, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.35), and any adverse event including accidental device removal (IRR 8.27, 95% CI 2.07 to 33.08). Patient characteristics (age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, admission category, prior substance abuse, prior psychotropic medication, pre-existing psychiatric condition or dementia) were not associated with PR use or number of days used. CONCLUSIONS: PR was used in half of the patients in these 51 ICUs. Treatment characteristics predominantly predicted PR use, as opposed to patient or hospital/ICU characteristics. Use of sedative, analgesic, and antipsychotic drugs, agitation, heavy sedation, and occurrence of an adverse event predicted PR use or number of days used. BioMed Central 2014 2014-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4075126/ /pubmed/24661688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13789 Text en Copyright © 2014 Luk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Luk, Elena
Sneyers, Barbara
Rose, Louise
Perreault, Marc M
Williamson, David R
Mehta, Sangeeta
Cook, Deborah J
Lapinsky, Stephanie C
Burry, Lisa
Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units
title Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units
title_full Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units
title_fullStr Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units
title_short Predictors of physical restraint use in Canadian intensive care units
title_sort predictors of physical restraint use in canadian intensive care units
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24661688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13789
work_keys_str_mv AT lukelena predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT sneyersbarbara predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT roselouise predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT perreaultmarcm predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT williamsondavidr predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT mehtasangeeta predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT cookdeborahj predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT lapinskystephaniec predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits
AT burrylisa predictorsofphysicalrestraintuseincanadianintensivecareunits