Cargando…

Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies

Maxillary reconstruction is still an evolving art when compared to the reconstruction of the mandible. The defects of maxilla apart from affecting the functions of the speech, swallowing and mastication also cause cosmetic disfigurement. Rehabilitation of the form and function in patients with maxil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iyer, Subramania, Thankappan, Krishnakumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987199
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129618
_version_ 1782323307328045056
author Iyer, Subramania
Thankappan, Krishnakumar
author_facet Iyer, Subramania
Thankappan, Krishnakumar
author_sort Iyer, Subramania
collection PubMed
description Maxillary reconstruction is still an evolving art when compared to the reconstruction of the mandible. The defects of maxilla apart from affecting the functions of the speech, swallowing and mastication also cause cosmetic disfigurement. Rehabilitation of the form and function in patients with maxillary defects is either by using an obturator prosthesis or by a surgical reconstruction. Literature is abundant with a variety of reconstructive methods. The classification systems are also varied, with no universal acceptance of any one of them. The oncologic safety of these procedures is still debated, and conclusive evidence in this regard has not emerged yet. Management of the orbit is also not yet addressed properly. Tissue engineering, that has been hyped to be one of the possible solutions for this vexing reconstructive problem, has not come out with reliable and reproducible results so far. This review article discusses the rationale and oncological safety of the reconstructing the maxillary defects, critically analyzes the classification systems, offers the different reconstructive methods and touches upon the controversies in this subject. The management of the retained and exenterated orbit associated with maxillectomy is reviewed. The surgical morbidity, complications and the recent advances in this field are also looked into. An algorithm, based on our experience, is presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4075223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40752232014-07-01 Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies Iyer, Subramania Thankappan, Krishnakumar Indian J Plast Surg Prof. Mira Sen (Banerjee) C.M.E. Article Maxillary reconstruction is still an evolving art when compared to the reconstruction of the mandible. The defects of maxilla apart from affecting the functions of the speech, swallowing and mastication also cause cosmetic disfigurement. Rehabilitation of the form and function in patients with maxillary defects is either by using an obturator prosthesis or by a surgical reconstruction. Literature is abundant with a variety of reconstructive methods. The classification systems are also varied, with no universal acceptance of any one of them. The oncologic safety of these procedures is still debated, and conclusive evidence in this regard has not emerged yet. Management of the orbit is also not yet addressed properly. Tissue engineering, that has been hyped to be one of the possible solutions for this vexing reconstructive problem, has not come out with reliable and reproducible results so far. This review article discusses the rationale and oncological safety of the reconstructing the maxillary defects, critically analyzes the classification systems, offers the different reconstructive methods and touches upon the controversies in this subject. The management of the retained and exenterated orbit associated with maxillectomy is reviewed. The surgical morbidity, complications and the recent advances in this field are also looked into. An algorithm, based on our experience, is presented. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4075223/ /pubmed/24987199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129618 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Prof. Mira Sen (Banerjee) C.M.E. Article
Iyer, Subramania
Thankappan, Krishnakumar
Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies
title Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies
title_full Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies
title_fullStr Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies
title_full_unstemmed Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies
title_short Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies
title_sort maxillary reconstruction: current concepts and controversies
topic Prof. Mira Sen (Banerjee) C.M.E. Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987199
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129618
work_keys_str_mv AT iyersubramania maxillaryreconstructioncurrentconceptsandcontroversies
AT thankappankrishnakumar maxillaryreconstructioncurrentconceptsandcontroversies