Cargando…
Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies
Maxillary reconstruction is still an evolving art when compared to the reconstruction of the mandible. The defects of maxilla apart from affecting the functions of the speech, swallowing and mastication also cause cosmetic disfigurement. Rehabilitation of the form and function in patients with maxil...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129618 |
_version_ | 1782323307328045056 |
---|---|
author | Iyer, Subramania Thankappan, Krishnakumar |
author_facet | Iyer, Subramania Thankappan, Krishnakumar |
author_sort | Iyer, Subramania |
collection | PubMed |
description | Maxillary reconstruction is still an evolving art when compared to the reconstruction of the mandible. The defects of maxilla apart from affecting the functions of the speech, swallowing and mastication also cause cosmetic disfigurement. Rehabilitation of the form and function in patients with maxillary defects is either by using an obturator prosthesis or by a surgical reconstruction. Literature is abundant with a variety of reconstructive methods. The classification systems are also varied, with no universal acceptance of any one of them. The oncologic safety of these procedures is still debated, and conclusive evidence in this regard has not emerged yet. Management of the orbit is also not yet addressed properly. Tissue engineering, that has been hyped to be one of the possible solutions for this vexing reconstructive problem, has not come out with reliable and reproducible results so far. This review article discusses the rationale and oncological safety of the reconstructing the maxillary defects, critically analyzes the classification systems, offers the different reconstructive methods and touches upon the controversies in this subject. The management of the retained and exenterated orbit associated with maxillectomy is reviewed. The surgical morbidity, complications and the recent advances in this field are also looked into. An algorithm, based on our experience, is presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4075223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40752232014-07-01 Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies Iyer, Subramania Thankappan, Krishnakumar Indian J Plast Surg Prof. Mira Sen (Banerjee) C.M.E. Article Maxillary reconstruction is still an evolving art when compared to the reconstruction of the mandible. The defects of maxilla apart from affecting the functions of the speech, swallowing and mastication also cause cosmetic disfigurement. Rehabilitation of the form and function in patients with maxillary defects is either by using an obturator prosthesis or by a surgical reconstruction. Literature is abundant with a variety of reconstructive methods. The classification systems are also varied, with no universal acceptance of any one of them. The oncologic safety of these procedures is still debated, and conclusive evidence in this regard has not emerged yet. Management of the orbit is also not yet addressed properly. Tissue engineering, that has been hyped to be one of the possible solutions for this vexing reconstructive problem, has not come out with reliable and reproducible results so far. This review article discusses the rationale and oncological safety of the reconstructing the maxillary defects, critically analyzes the classification systems, offers the different reconstructive methods and touches upon the controversies in this subject. The management of the retained and exenterated orbit associated with maxillectomy is reviewed. The surgical morbidity, complications and the recent advances in this field are also looked into. An algorithm, based on our experience, is presented. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4075223/ /pubmed/24987199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129618 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Prof. Mira Sen (Banerjee) C.M.E. Article Iyer, Subramania Thankappan, Krishnakumar Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies |
title | Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies |
title_full | Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies |
title_fullStr | Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies |
title_full_unstemmed | Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies |
title_short | Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies |
title_sort | maxillary reconstruction: current concepts and controversies |
topic | Prof. Mira Sen (Banerjee) C.M.E. Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.129618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iyersubramania maxillaryreconstructioncurrentconceptsandcontroversies AT thankappankrishnakumar maxillaryreconstructioncurrentconceptsandcontroversies |